Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Euroimmun Reference Laboratory, Lübeck, Germany.
Front Immunol. 2022 Mar 3;13:837376. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.837376. eCollection 2022.
Neural autoantibody-associated dementia (NABD) is an increasing phenomenon in memory clinics with a high impact on later therapy. Biomarkers are lacking that differentiate this type of dementia from neurodegenerative dementia such as Alzheimer's dementia (AD). Our aim is to analyze neurodegeneration markers and their relationship to progressing cognitive dysfunction in NABD and AD to test for tools differentiating these two forms of dementia prior to neural autoantibody testing.
In our retrospective, observational study, we investigated 14 patients with dementia and serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neural autoantibodies as well as 14 patients with AD by relying on recent CSF and clinical criteria for AD. Patient files were checked for psychopathology, neuropsychological test performance, autoimmune indicators, CSF, and MRI results.
Our patient groups did not differ in their psychopathology, autoimmune indicators, or MRI profile. The progression of cognitive dysfunction [as measured by the difference in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores since disease onset, and the yearly progression rate (MMSE loss/per year)] did not vary significantly between groups. Total tau protein was significantly higher in AD patients than NABD patients revealing no signs of Alzheimer's disease pathology in their CSF (p < 0.05). Total tau protein levels in CSF correlated with cognitive decline since disease onset (r = 0.38, p < 0.05) and yearly progression rates (r = 0.56, p < 0.005) in all patients.
Our results suggest that the progression of cognitive dysfunction as defined by MMSE does not seem to be an appropriate biomarker for distinguishing NABD from AD. However, the total tau protein level in CSF might be a relevant molecular biomarker that can indicate disease pathology and/or progression in both known AD and NABD, which is often accompanied by axonal degeneration. Total tau protein may be an additional diagnostic tool with which to differentiate anti-neural-associated dementia from AD if further research confirms these proof-of-concept findings in larger patient cohorts.
神经自身抗体相关性痴呆(NABD)是记忆门诊中一种日益增多的现象,对后期治疗有很大影响。目前缺乏能够将这种类型的痴呆与阿尔茨海默病(AD)等神经退行性痴呆区分开来的生物标志物。我们的目的是分析神经退行性变标志物及其与 NABD 和 AD 认知功能进行性障碍的关系,以在进行神经自身抗体检测之前,寻找区分这两种痴呆的工具。
在我们的回顾性观察研究中,我们调查了 14 例痴呆患者,这些患者的血清和/或脑脊液(CSF)中存在神经自身抗体,以及 14 例符合 AD 最近 CSF 和临床标准的 AD 患者。检查患者的档案以了解其精神病理学、神经心理学测试表现、自身免疫指标、CSF 和 MRI 结果。
我们的患者组在精神病理学、自身免疫指标或 MRI 特征方面没有差异。认知功能障碍的进展[通过疾病发病以来的 Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)评分差异以及每年的进展率(MMSE 损失/年)来衡量]在两组之间没有显著差异。AD 患者的总 tau 蛋白明显高于 NABD 患者,其 CSF 中没有发现阿尔茨海默病病理的迹象(p < 0.05)。CSF 中的总 tau 蛋白水平与疾病发病以来的认知衰退(r = 0.38,p < 0.05)和所有患者的每年进展率(r = 0.56,p < 0.005)相关。
我们的结果表明,MMSE 定义的认知功能障碍进展似乎不是区分 NABD 和 AD 的合适生物标志物。然而,CSF 中的总 tau 蛋白水平可能是一种相关的分子生物标志物,可以指示已知 AD 和 NABD 中的疾病病理和/或进展,这通常伴随着轴突变性。如果进一步的研究在更大的患者队列中证实了这些概念验证结果,总 tau 蛋白可能是一种额外的诊断工具,可以将抗神经相关痴呆与 AD 区分开来。