Suppr超能文献

全身电刺激诱导的强直后增强和激活后增强对最大等长肌力的影响。

Effects of post-tetanic potentiation induced by whole-body electrostimulation and post-activation potentiation on maximum isometric strength.

作者信息

Dote-Montero Manuel, Pelayo-Tejo Ignacio, Molina-Garcia Pablo, Carle-Calo Abraham, García-Ramos Amador, Chirosa-Ríos Luis J, Chirosa-Ríos Ignacio J, Amaro-Gahete Francisco J

机构信息

PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity Research Group (PROFITH), Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Granada, Camino de Alfacar s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Granada, Camino de Alfacar s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Biol Sport. 2022 Mar;39(2):451-461. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.106153. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Abstract

It is currently unknown the most effective potentiation protocol to increase maximum strength. Hence, we investigated the separated and combined effects of post-tetanic potentiation (PTP) induced by whole-body electrostimulation (WB-EMS) and post-activation potentiation (PAP) induced by voluntary maximum isometric contractions on maximum isometric strength. Ten trained males were randomly evaluated on four occasions. In session A, maximum isometric strength (split squat) was measured in minutes 1, 4, and 8. In session B, the measurements were taken in minutes 2, 6, and 10. In session C, a WB-EMS protocol was applied to elicit PTP and the measurements were performed in minutes 1, 4, and 8. In session D, the same WB-EMS protocol was applied and the measurements were taken in minutes 2, 6, and 10. No significant differences in maximum isometric strength were observed between: (i) the control and WB-EMS in minutes 1 vs. 1 and 2 vs. 2; (ii) the control and PAP in minutes 1 vs. 4, 1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 6, and 2 vs. 10; and (iii) the PAP and WB-EMS plus PAP in minutes 4 vs. 4, 8 vs. 8, 6 vs. 6, and 10 vs. 10. In contrast, the WB-EMS plus PAP revealed a significant increase of 54% (~450 N) compared to the WB-EMS in minutes 4 and 8 compared to the minute 1 (p < 0.001), but not between minutes 2 vs. 6 and 2 vs. 10. The present results showed that PTP induced by WB-EMS in isolation or combined with PAP induced by voluntary maximum isometric contractions did not produce a significant increase in maximum isometric strength compared to the control and PAP alone, respectively.

摘要

目前尚不清楚增加最大力量的最有效增强方案是什么。因此,我们研究了全身电刺激(WB-EMS)诱导的强直后增强(PTP)和自愿最大等长收缩诱导的激活后增强(PAP)对最大等长力量的单独和联合作用。10名受过训练的男性在四个不同场合接受了随机评估。在A组中,在第1、4和8分钟测量最大等长力量(分腿蹲)。在B组中,在第2、6和10分钟进行测量。在C组中,应用WB-EMS方案引发PTP,并在第1、4和8分钟进行测量。在D组中,应用相同的WB-EMS方案,并在第2、6和10分钟进行测量。在以下情况之间未观察到最大等长力量的显著差异:(i)第1分钟时对照组与WB-EMS组(1对1)以及第2分钟时对照组与WB-EMS组(2对2);(ii)第1分钟时对照组与PAP组(1对4、1对8)、第2分钟时对照组与PAP组(2对6、2对10);以及(iii)第4分钟时PAP组与WB-EMS加PAP组(4对4)、第8分钟时PAP组与WB-EMS加PAP组(8对8)、第6分钟时PAP组与WB-EMS加PAP组(6对6)以及第10分钟时PAP组与WB-EMS加PAP组(10对10)。相比之下,与第1分钟相比,在第4分钟和第8分钟时,WB-EMS加PAP组相较于WB-EMS组最大等长力量显著增加了54%(约450 N)(p < 0.001),但在第2分钟与第6分钟以及第2分钟与第10分钟之间没有这种情况。目前的结果表明,单独由WB-EMS诱导的PTP或与自愿最大等长收缩诱导的PAP联合使用,与单独的对照组和PAP相比,最大等长力量均未产生显著增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验