Suppr超能文献

豚鼠耳后与肌肉注射地塞米松至内耳途径的比较

Comparison of the Pathway to the Inner Ear Between Postauricular and Intramuscular Injection of Dexamethasone in Guinea Pigs.

作者信息

Chen Aiping, Liu Wenwen, Xu Lei, Hou Zhiqiang, Fan Zhaomin, Wang Haibo, Wang Mingming

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Shandong Institute of Otolaryngology, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 4;13:811626. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.811626. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postauricular injection as a local therapy has been confirmed to be effective for inner ear diseases. However, the mechanism for the drugs entering the inner ears remains unknown. This study aims to compare the distribution of dexamethasone by intramuscular injection with that by postauricular injection, and explore the pathway of the drugs entering the inner ears.

METHODS

An optical imaging system was used to conduct a time course observation to compare the distribution of dexamethasone by intramuscular injection with that by postauricular injection in male guinea pigs. The drug availability in the tympanic mucosa, tympanum, endolymphatic sac, and cochlea was observed by a confocal laser scanning microscope.

RESULTS

The local fluorescent intensity by postauricular injection was significantly higher in the inner ears, and lower in partial peripheral organs, than that by the intramuscular injection. The drug metabolism by postauricular injection exhibited an obviously sustained release effect in the inner ears. Drugs by postauricular injection might enter the endolymphatic sac through the posterior auricular artery and occipital artery, as well as the connections of the mastoid emissary vein, sigmoid sinus and endolymphatic sac.

CONCLUSION

More drugs concentrated in the inner ear for longer therapeutic time and less systemic delivery implied more effective and less risk of side effects through postauricular injection than intramuscular injection safer for the treatment of inner ear diseases.

摘要

背景

耳后注射作为一种局部治疗方法已被证实对内耳疾病有效。然而,药物进入内耳的机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较地塞米松肌肉注射与耳后注射的分布情况,并探索药物进入内耳的途径。

方法

使用光学成像系统对雄性豚鼠进行时间进程观察,比较地塞米松肌肉注射与耳后注射的分布情况。通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察鼓膜黏膜、鼓膜、内淋巴囊和耳蜗中的药物摄取情况。

结果

耳后注射在内耳中的局部荧光强度明显高于肌肉注射,而在部分外周器官中的荧光强度则低于肌肉注射。耳后注射的药物代谢在内耳中表现出明显的缓释作用。耳后注射的药物可能通过耳后动脉和枕动脉以及乳突导静脉、乙状窦和内淋巴囊的连接进入内淋巴囊。

结论

与肌肉注射相比,耳后注射使更多药物集中在内耳,治疗时间更长,全身给药更少,这意味着耳后注射治疗内耳疾病更有效且副作用风险更低、更安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ae/8930822/11afb9f9d922/fneur-13-811626-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验