Chen Aiping, Liu Wenwen, Xu Lei, Hou Zhiqiang, Fan Zhaomin, Wang Haibo, Wang Mingming
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong Institute of Otolaryngology, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 4;13:811626. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.811626. eCollection 2022.
Postauricular injection as a local therapy has been confirmed to be effective for inner ear diseases. However, the mechanism for the drugs entering the inner ears remains unknown. This study aims to compare the distribution of dexamethasone by intramuscular injection with that by postauricular injection, and explore the pathway of the drugs entering the inner ears.
An optical imaging system was used to conduct a time course observation to compare the distribution of dexamethasone by intramuscular injection with that by postauricular injection in male guinea pigs. The drug availability in the tympanic mucosa, tympanum, endolymphatic sac, and cochlea was observed by a confocal laser scanning microscope.
The local fluorescent intensity by postauricular injection was significantly higher in the inner ears, and lower in partial peripheral organs, than that by the intramuscular injection. The drug metabolism by postauricular injection exhibited an obviously sustained release effect in the inner ears. Drugs by postauricular injection might enter the endolymphatic sac through the posterior auricular artery and occipital artery, as well as the connections of the mastoid emissary vein, sigmoid sinus and endolymphatic sac.
More drugs concentrated in the inner ear for longer therapeutic time and less systemic delivery implied more effective and less risk of side effects through postauricular injection than intramuscular injection safer for the treatment of inner ear diseases.
耳后注射作为一种局部治疗方法已被证实对内耳疾病有效。然而,药物进入内耳的机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较地塞米松肌肉注射与耳后注射的分布情况,并探索药物进入内耳的途径。
使用光学成像系统对雄性豚鼠进行时间进程观察,比较地塞米松肌肉注射与耳后注射的分布情况。通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察鼓膜黏膜、鼓膜、内淋巴囊和耳蜗中的药物摄取情况。
耳后注射在内耳中的局部荧光强度明显高于肌肉注射,而在部分外周器官中的荧光强度则低于肌肉注射。耳后注射的药物代谢在内耳中表现出明显的缓释作用。耳后注射的药物可能通过耳后动脉和枕动脉以及乳突导静脉、乙状窦和内淋巴囊的连接进入内淋巴囊。
与肌肉注射相比,耳后注射使更多药物集中在内耳,治疗时间更长,全身给药更少,这意味着耳后注射治疗内耳疾病更有效且副作用风险更低、更安全。