• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应由国家管控来预防电子赌博机造成的赌博危害。

Gambling harms caused by electronic gambling machines should be prevented with state control.

作者信息

Järvinen-Tassopoulos Johanna, Marionneau Virve, Nikkinen Janne

机构信息

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):631-639. doi: 10.1177/14550725211034030. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1177/14550725211034030
PMID:35309854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8900179/
Abstract

Unlike in other Nordic countries, most of the electronic gambling machines (EGMs) are placed outside the Casino Helsinki and the gambling arcades in Finland. The placement of EGMs in non-casino locations, such as supermarkets, kiosks, and petrol stations, is matter of serious concern. We argue that availability and accessibility of EGMs has led to normalisation and banalisation of gambling in Finland. Exposure to EGMs also put at risk vulnerable populations and problem gamblers, who already suffer from the negative consequences of gambling harms. Gambling companies' self-regulation initiatives and corporate social responsibility programmes are not enough to prevent and limit EGM related gambling harms. We suggest that Finland should follow Norway's example and limit the availability of EGMs and transfer them from non-casino locations to gambling arcades. Finnish EGM policy should be a question of public policy guided by public health concerns.

摘要

与其他北欧国家不同,芬兰的大多数电子赌博机(EGM)放置在赫尔辛基赌场和赌博街之外。在非赌场场所,如超市、报亭和加油站放置电子赌博机,是一个令人严重关切的问题。我们认为,电子赌博机的可得性和易接近性导致了芬兰赌博的常态化和平庸化。接触电子赌博机也使弱势群体和问题赌徒面临风险,他们已经受到赌博危害的负面影响。赌博公司的自我监管举措和企业社会责任计划不足以预防和限制与电子赌博机相关的赌博危害。我们建议芬兰应效仿挪威,限制电子赌博机的可得性,并将它们从非赌场场所转移到赌博街。芬兰的电子赌博机政策应该是以公共卫生问题为导向的公共政策问题。

相似文献

1
Gambling harms caused by electronic gambling machines should be prevented with state control.应由国家管控来预防电子赌博机造成的赌博危害。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):631-639. doi: 10.1177/14550725211034030. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
From Habit-Forming to Habit-Breaking Availability: Experiences on Electronic Gambling Machine Closures During COVID-19.从养成习惯到打破习惯的可得性:新冠疫情期间电子赌博机关闭的经历
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:788586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788586. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluating changes in electronic gambling machine policy on user losses in an Australian jurisdiction.评估澳大利亚司法管辖区中电子赌博机政策对用户损失的影响变化。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 6;19(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6814-1.
4
The density of electronic gambling machines and area-level socioeconomic status in Finland: a country with a legal monopoly on gambling and a decentralised system of EGMs.芬兰电子赌博机的密度与地区社会经济地位:一个对赌博实行合法垄断且拥有分散式电子赌博机系统的国家。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7535-1.
5
Addressing gambling harms by reducing the supply of electronic gambling machines: a comparative study of Italy and Finland.通过减少电子赌博机的供应来解决赌博危害:意大利和芬兰的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 20;22(1):1016. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13398-0.
6
Do EGMs have a Stronger Association with Problem Gambling than Racing and Casino Table Games? Evidence from a Decade of Australian Prevalence Studies.电子游戏赌博机是否比赛马和赌场桌面游戏与问题赌博的关联性更强?来自澳大利亚十年流行研究的证据。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Jun;36(2):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09950-5.
7
Accessibility, neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and expenditures on electronic gambling machines: a spatial analysis based on player account data.可及性、邻里社会经济劣势与电子赌博机支出:基于玩家账户数据的空间分析。
Int J Health Geogr. 2024 Aug 31;23(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12942-024-00379-2.
8
Electronic gaming machine accessibility and gambling problems: A natural policy experiment.电子游戏设备的可及性与赌博问题:一项自然政策实验。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Aug 18;12(3):721-732. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00044. Print 2023 Oct 5.
9
Children's attitudes towards Electronic Gambling Machines: an exploratory qualitative study of children who attend community clubs.儿童对电子赌博机的态度:对参加社区俱乐部儿童的探索性定性研究
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 8;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0148-z.
10
Attitudes towards community gambling venues and support for regulatory reform: an online panel study of residents in New South Wales, Australia.社区赌博场所态度与监管改革支持:澳大利亚新南威尔士州居民在线小组研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2018 Apr 2;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12954-018-0218-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Spanish gambling regulations on online gambling behavior and marketing strategies.西班牙赌博法规对在线赌博行为及营销策略的影响。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jun 13;22(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01219-7.
2
Risk and Protective Factors for Gambling Among Youth by origin: Findings from the three waves of cross-sectional Finnish School Health Promotion Study among 238,939 Students.青少年赌博的风险和保护因素:来自芬兰三波横断面学校健康促进研究在 238939 名学生中的发现。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Dec;40(4):1905-1919. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10321-7. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
Increased volatility in video poker results in more winning players but shorter winning streaks - Evidence from simulations.视频扑克中波动性的增加会导致更多玩家获胜,但连胜期更短——来自模拟的证据。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Sep 25;12(3):711-20. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00048.
4
Messages from research: Tobacco, drug use, gambling.研究信息:烟草、吸毒、赌博。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):537-539. doi: 10.1177/14550725211059054. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
From Habit-Forming to Habit-Breaking Availability: Experiences on Electronic Gambling Machine Closures During COVID-19.从养成习惯到打破习惯的可得性:新冠疫情期间电子赌博机关闭的经历
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:788586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788586. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing gambling harms by reducing the supply of electronic gambling machines: a comparative study of Italy and Finland.通过减少电子赌博机的供应来解决赌博危害:意大利和芬兰的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 20;22(1):1016. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13398-0.
2
On the efficiency of Nordic state-controlled gambling companies.论北欧国家控制的博彩公司的效率。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Jun;38(3):212-226. doi: 10.1177/1455072520968024. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
A public health approach to gambling regulation: countering powerful influences.公共卫生方法治理赌博:抵制强大影响。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Aug;6(8):e614-e619. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00098-0. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Young people's reflections on the factors contributing to the normalisation of gambling in Australia.年轻人对澳大利亚赌博正常化因素的反思。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Apr;45(2):165-170. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13063. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Transitioning Between Online Gambling Modalities and Decrease in Total Gambling Activity, but No Indication of Increase in Problematic Online Gambling Intensity During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Sweden: A Time Series Forecast Study.在瑞典 COVID-19 疫情爆发的第一阶段,从在线赌博模式转变与总赌博活动减少,但无迹象表明问题性在线赌博强度增加:一项时间序列预测研究。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 29;8:554542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.554542. eCollection 2020.
6
Impact of COVID-19 on Online Gambling - A General Population Survey During the Pandemic.新冠疫情对在线赌博的影响——疫情期间的一项普通人群调查
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:568543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568543. eCollection 2020.
7
Setting Limits: Gambling, Science and Public Policy-summary of results.设定界限:赌博、科学与公共政策——研究结果摘要
Addiction. 2021 Jan;116(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/add.15241. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Cultures and spaces of convenience gambling.便利赌博的场所与空间。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2019 Apr;36(2):125-139. doi: 10.1177/1455072518807792. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
9
Stakeholder interests in gambling revenue: an obstacle to public health interventions?利益相关者对博彩收入的关注:公共卫生干预的障碍?
Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm.赌博与公共健康:我们需要政策行动来预防危害。
BMJ. 2019 May 8;365:l1807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1807.