• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视频扑克中波动性的增加会导致更多玩家获胜,但连胜期更短——来自模拟的证据。

Increased volatility in video poker results in more winning players but shorter winning streaks - Evidence from simulations.

作者信息

Palomäki Jussi, Turner Nigel, Macey Joseph, Castrén Sari

机构信息

1Health and Well-Being Promotion Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.

2Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Behav Addict. 2023 Sep 25;12(3):711-20. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00048.

DOI:10.1556/2006.2023.00048
PMID:37747835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10562822/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHOD

Electronic gambling machines are a prominent cause of significant gambling harms globally. We use simulations of a simplified video poker game to show how changes in game volatility, defined primarily by the size of the main prize, affect patterns of wins and losses as well as winning streaks.

RESULTS

We found that in low- and medium volatility games the proportion of winning players quickly drops to zero after about 30 h of play, while in the high volatility game 5% of players are still winning after playing for 100 h. However, the proportion of winning streaks was significantly higher in the low- and medium volatility games compared with high volatility: the simulated players were on a winning streak about 26.3, 25.6 and 18% of the time in the low-, medium- and high volatility games, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast-paced video poker with varying volatility levels but identical return-to-player rates and win frequencies can yield highly different result patterns across individuals. These patterns may be counter-intuitive for players and difficult to realize without simulations and visualizations. We argue that the findings have relevance for responsible gambling communication and for building a better understanding of how cognitive biases influence gambling behaviour.

摘要

目的与方法

电子赌博机是全球重大赌博危害的一个突出原因。我们通过对一个简化视频扑克游戏的模拟,来展示主要由头奖大小定义的游戏波动性变化如何影响输赢模式以及连胜情况。

结果

我们发现,在低波动性和中等波动性游戏中,大约30小时游戏后,获胜玩家的比例迅速降至零,而在高波动性游戏中,100小时游戏后仍有5%的玩家在赢。然而,低波动性和中等波动性游戏中的连胜比例显著高于高波动性游戏:在低、中、高波动性游戏中,模拟玩家处于连胜状态的时间分别约为26.3%、25.6%和18%。

结论

具有不同波动性水平但玩家回报率和赢牌频率相同的快节奏视频扑克,在不同个体间可能产生截然不同的结果模式。这些模式对玩家来说可能违反直觉,且若无模拟和可视化则难以理解。我们认为这些发现与负责任的赌博宣传相关,也有助于更好地理解认知偏差如何影响赌博行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/a67ebc9ee826/jba-12-711-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/58861b645261/jba-12-711-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/0d5067c1c373/jba-12-711-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/e2f88b66ae9a/jba-12-711-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/71a6c33a2b93/jba-12-711-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/a67ebc9ee826/jba-12-711-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/58861b645261/jba-12-711-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/0d5067c1c373/jba-12-711-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/e2f88b66ae9a/jba-12-711-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/71a6c33a2b93/jba-12-711-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b2/10562822/a67ebc9ee826/jba-12-711-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Increased volatility in video poker results in more winning players but shorter winning streaks - Evidence from simulations.视频扑克中波动性的增加会导致更多玩家获胜,但连胜期更短——来自模拟的证据。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Sep 25;12(3):711-20. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00048.
2
Irrational thinking among slot machine players.老虎机玩家的非理性思维。
J Gambl Stud. 1992 Sep;8(3):245-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01014652.
3
Volatility, house edge and prize structure of gambling games.赌博游戏的波动性、庄家优势和奖池结构。
J Gambl Stud. 2011 Dec;27(4):607-23. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9238-0.
4
Between-session chasing of losses and wins in an online eCasino.在线电子赌场中赢/输之间的局间追逐。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Apr 23;13(2):665-675. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00022. Print 2024 Jun 26.
5
Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players.病理性赌博扑克玩家的概率估计和决策能力受损。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Mar;28(1):113-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9244-2.
6
The allure of multi-line games in modern slot machines.现代老虎机中多线游戏的魅力。
Addiction. 2014 Nov;109(11):1920-8. doi: 10.1111/add.12675. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
7
Do losses disguised as wins create a "sweet spot" for win overestimates in multiline slots play?作为输家的伪装赢家是否为多线插槽游戏中的赢高估创造了“甜蜜点”?
Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106598. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106598. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
8
Neural correlates of the impact of prior outcomes on subsequent monetary decision-making in frequent poker players.频繁玩扑克牌者先前结果对后续金钱决策影响的神经关联
Biol Psychol. 2017 Mar;124:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
9
An analysis of switching and non-switching slot machine player behaviour.切换和非切换老虎机玩家行为分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2013 Dec;29(4):631-45. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9329-6.
10
Social and psychological challenges of poker.扑克的社会和心理挑战。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Sep;26(3):401-20. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9168-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Illusions of control: A quasi-experiment comparing skill-based and traditional slot machines.控制错觉:一项比较基于技能的老虎机和传统老虎机的准实验。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Oct 15;13(4):962-973. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00057. Print 2024 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Unambiguous evidence that over half of gambling problems in Australia are caused by electronic gambling machines: Results from a large-scale composite population study.明确证据表明,澳大利亚超过一半的赌博问题是由电子赌博机造成的:一项大规模综合人群研究的结果。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Feb 1;12(1):182-193. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00083. Print 2023 Mar 30.
2
The complex nature of human operant gambling behaviour involving slot games: Structural characteristics, verbal rules and motivation.人类操作性赌博行为(涉及老虎机游戏)的复杂性:结构特征、口头规则和动机。
Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107540. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107540. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
3
Winning and losing in online gambling: Effects on within-session chasing.
网络赌博中的赢与输:对单次赌博中追号行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0273359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273359. eCollection 2022.
4
House-edge information and a volatility warning lead to reduced gambling expenditure: Potential improvements to return-to-player percentages.赌场优势信息和波动性预警导致赌博支出减少:提高返奖率的潜在改进。
Addict Behav. 2022 Jul;130:107308. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107308. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
5
Gambling harms caused by electronic gambling machines should be prevented with state control.应由国家管控来预防电子赌博机造成的赌博危害。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):631-639. doi: 10.1177/14550725211034030. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Structural characteristics of fixed-odds sports betting products.固定赔率体育博彩产品的结构特征。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Apr 8;10(3):371-80. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00008.
7
Risk communication improvements for gambling: House-edge information and volatility statements.改善赌博风险沟通:庄家优势信息和波动性声明。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Jun;36(4):358-363. doi: 10.1037/adb0000695. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Recollected usage of legal youth gambling products: Comparisons between adult gamblers and non-gamblers in the UK and Australia.合法青少年赌博产品的回忆性使用情况:英国和澳大利亚成年赌徒与非赌徒的比较。
Addict Behav. 2021 Mar;114:106685. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106685. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
9
Gambling-Related Cognitive Distortions in Residential Treatment for Gambling Disorder.赌博障碍住院治疗中的与赌博相关的认知扭曲。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Jun;36(2):669-683. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09895-4.
10
The joint role of impulsivity and distorted cognitions in recreational and problem gambling: A cluster analytic approach.冲动性和认知扭曲在娱乐性和问题赌博中的共同作用:一种聚类分析方法。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:473-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.096. Epub 2019 Sep 2.