Department of Chemical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Nanomedicine. 2022 Mar 12;17:1035-1068. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S353062. eCollection 2022.
One of the most arduous challenges in tissue engineering is neovascularization, without which there is a lack of nutrients delivered to a target tissue. Angiogenesis should be completed at an optimal density and within an appropriate period of time to prevent cell necrosis. Failure to meet this challenge brings about poor functionality for the tissue in comparison with the native tissue, extensively reducing cell viability. Prior studies devoted to angiogenesis have provided researchers with some biomaterial scaffolds and cell choices for angiogenesis. For example, while most current angiogenesis approaches require a variety of stimulatory factors ranging from biomechanical to biomolecular to cellular, some other promising stimulatory factors have been underdeveloped (such as electrical, topographical, and magnetic). When it comes to choosing biomaterial scaffolds in tissue engineering for angiogenesis, key traits rush to mind including biocompatibility, appropriate physical and mechanical properties (adhesion strength, shear stress, and malleability), as well as identifying the appropriate biomaterial in terms of stability and degradation profile, all of which may leave essential trace materials behind adversely influencing angiogenesis. Nevertheless, the selection of the best biomaterial and cells still remains an area of hot dispute as such previous studies have not sufficiently classified, integrated, or compared approaches. To address the aforementioned need, this review article summarizes a variety of natural and synthetic scaffolds including hydrogels that support angiogenesis. Furthermore, we review a variety of cell sources utilized for cell seeding and influential factors used for angiogenesis with a concentrated focus on biomechanical factors, with unique stimulatory factors. Lastly, we provide a bottom-to-up overview of angiogenic biomaterials and cell selection, highlighting parameters that need to be addressed in future studies.
在组织工程中,最艰巨的挑战之一是血管新生,没有它,目标组织就会缺乏营养物质输送。新生血管应该以最佳密度和在适当的时间内完成,以防止细胞坏死。如果不能满足这一挑战,与天然组织相比,组织的功能就会很差,大大降低细胞的存活率。先前的血管新生研究为研究人员提供了一些用于血管新生的生物材料支架和细胞选择。例如,虽然目前大多数血管新生方法需要从生物力学到生物分子到细胞的各种刺激因子,但一些其他有前途的刺激因子尚未得到充分开发(如电、地形和磁)。在组织工程中选择用于血管新生的生物材料支架时,人们首先会想到生物相容性、适当的物理和机械性能(附着力、剪切力和延展性),以及根据稳定性和降解曲线来确定合适的生物材料,所有这些都可能留下对血管新生产生不利影响的痕量物质。然而,选择最佳的生物材料和细胞仍然是一个热点争议领域,因为之前的研究没有充分分类、整合或比较方法。为了解决上述需求,本文综述了各种支持血管新生的天然和合成支架,包括水凝胶。此外,我们还综述了用于细胞接种的各种细胞来源和用于血管新生的影响因素,重点关注生物力学因素和独特的刺激因素。最后,我们从底层到顶层概述了血管生成生物材料和细胞选择,强调了未来研究中需要解决的参数。