• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网上的元准确性:潜在维度、影响因素和偏差的初步测试

Meta-Accuracy on the Internet: Initial Tests of Underlying Dimensions, Contributing Factors, and Biases.

作者信息

Tsankova Elena, Tair Ergyul

机构信息

Personality Psychology and Methodology of Psychological Measurement, Department of Psychology, Institute for Population and Human Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 2;13:837931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837931. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837931
PMID:35310286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8926076/
Abstract

Meta-accuracy (correspondence between how we think others perceive us and how they really perceive us) of first impressions on the Internet has the potential to shape subsequent interactions. Aiming to enhance understanding of the underlying perceptual dimensions, the contribution of social competence, and the existence of positive/negative bias in first impressions' meta-accuracy online, we conducted a study in a simulated asynchronous social-media-type setting. Target participants uploaded a selfie, wrote a short description of themselves, provided estimates of how warm and competent they believed others would find them based on their selfies and texts (metaperception), and completed two social competence questionnaires (general and Internet-specific). Perceiver participants assessed the warmth and competence of the selfies and texts as well (others' perception). Meta-accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between metaperception and others' perception. Through correlational analyses, we confirmed that meta-accuracy of first impressions on the Internet aligned with the universal dimensions of social cognition (warmth and competence), found sporadic evidence for the positive association between meta-accuracy and social competence, and showed that meta-accuracy for specific Internet expressive means varied with varying proficiency in these means. Through -tests, we demonstrated positive meta-accuracy bias for selfies along the warmth dimension and negative bias for text along the competence dimension. Overall, our results suggest the primacy of warmth and uniqueness of the male targets-female perceivers combination for meta-accuracy on the Internet. Our findings expand knowledge about first impressions' meta-accuracy on the Internet.

摘要

网络上第一印象的元准确性(即我们认为他人如何看待我们与他人实际如何看待我们之间的对应关系)有可能塑造后续的互动。为了增强对潜在感知维度、社交能力的贡献以及网络上第一印象元准确性中积极/消极偏差的存在的理解,我们在一个模拟的异步社交媒体类型环境中进行了一项研究。目标参与者上传一张自拍照,写一段关于自己的简短描述,根据他们的自拍照和文字提供他们认为他人会觉得他们有多热情和有能力的估计(元感知),并完成两份社交能力问卷(一般问卷和特定于网络的问卷)。感知者参与者也评估了自拍照和文字的热情和能力(他人的感知)。元准确性被测量为元感知与他人感知之间的绝对差异。通过相关分析,我们证实了网络上第一印象的元准确性与社会认知的普遍维度(热情和能力)一致,发现了元准确性与社交能力之间正相关的零星证据,并表明特定网络表达手段的元准确性随着在这些手段上的熟练程度不同而变化。通过t检验,我们证明了自拍照在热情维度上存在正元准确性偏差,而文字在能力维度上存在负偏差。总体而言,我们的结果表明在网络元准确性方面,热情的首要性以及男性目标 - 女性感知者组合的独特性。我们的发现扩展了关于网络上第一印象元准确性的知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9b/8926076/3040bac4737b/fpsyg-13-837931-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9b/8926076/3040bac4737b/fpsyg-13-837931-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b9b/8926076/3040bac4737b/fpsyg-13-837931-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-Accuracy on the Internet: Initial Tests of Underlying Dimensions, Contributing Factors, and Biases.互联网上的元准确性:潜在维度、影响因素和偏差的初步测试
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 2;13:837931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837931. eCollection 2022.
2
Metaperception in cyberspace.网络空间中的元感知。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2001 Feb;4(1):123-9. doi: 10.1089/10949310151088497.
3
Of Nice and Mean: The Personal Relevance of Others' Competence Drives Perceptions of Warmth.论友善与刻薄:他人能力的个人相关性会影响我们对其温暖程度的感知。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Nov;45(11):1549-1562. doi: 10.1177/0146167219835213. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
"Zooming" in on positive and accurate metaperceptions in first impressions: Examining the links with social anxiety and liking in online video interactions.在第一印象中准确感知积极和准确的印象:在线视频互动中考察与社交焦虑和喜欢的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;125(4):852-873. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000457. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Who influences meta-accuracy? It takes two to know the impressions we make.谁影响元准确性?要了解我们留下的印象,需要两个人。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul;121(1):201-214. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000376. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Downplaying Positive Impressions: Compensation Between Warmth and Competence in Impression Management.淡化积极印象:印象管理中热情与能力之间的补偿
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan;49(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.001.
7
The Selfie Paradox: Nobody Seems to Like Them Yet Everyone Has Reasons to Take Them. An Exploration of Psychological Functions of Selfies in Self-Presentation.自拍悖论:似乎没人喜欢自拍,但每个人都有自拍的理由。对自拍在自我展示中的心理功能的探索。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 17;8:7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00007. eCollection 2017.
8
Primacy of warmth versus competence: a motivated bias?温暖优先于能力:一种有动机的偏见?
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;152(4):417-35. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.623735.
9
Social perceptions of warmth and competence influence behavioral intentions and neural processing.社会对温暖和能力的感知会影响行为意图和神经处理。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Apr;20(2):265-275. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00767-3.
10
Warmth Trumps Competence in Evaluations of Both Ingroup and Outgroup.在对内群体和外群体的评价中,温暖胜过能力。
Int J Sci Commer Humanit. 2013 Sep;1(6):99-105.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-Accuracy of Very First Impressions: A Mini Review.第一印象的元准确性:一篇小型综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:736534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736534. eCollection 2021.
2
Who influences meta-accuracy? It takes two to know the impressions we make.谁影响元准确性?要了解我们留下的印象,需要两个人。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul;121(1):201-214. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000376. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Is Impression Management Through Status Updates Successful? Meta-Accuracy and Judgment Accuracy of Big Five Personality Traits Based on Status Updates From Social Network Sites in China.
通过状态更新进行的印象管理是否成功?基于中国社交网站状态更新的大五人格特质的元准确性和判断准确性。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 24;10:1192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01192. eCollection 2019.
4
Eagerness and Optimistically Biased Metaperception: The More Eager to Learn Others' Evaluations, the Higher the Estimation of Others' Evaluations.急切与乐观偏差的元认知:越急于了解他人的评价,对他人评价的估计就越高。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 15;9:715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00715. eCollection 2018.
5
Brief Report: Adults with Autism are Less Accurate at Predicting How Their Personality Traits are Evaluated by Unfamiliar Observers.简要报告:自闭症成年人在预测不熟悉的观察者如何评价他们的个性特征方面准确性较低。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Jun;48(6):2243-2248. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3487-z.
6
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
7
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
8
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence.社会认知的普遍维度:热情与能力。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
9
First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.第一印象:在对一张脸暴露100毫秒后做出决定。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):592-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x.
10
Very first impressions.第一印象。
Emotion. 2006 May;6(2):269-78. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269.