• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会认知的普遍维度:热情与能力。

Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence.

作者信息

Fiske Susan T, Cuddy Amy J C, Glick Peter

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Green Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
PMID:17188552
Abstract

Like all perception, social perception reflects evolutionary pressures. In encounters with conspecifics, social animals must determine, immediately, whether the "other" is friend or foe (i.e. intends good or ill) and, then, whether the "other" has the ability to enact those intentions. New data confirm these two universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Promoting survival, these dimensions provide fundamental social structural answers about competition and status. People perceived as warm and competent elicit uniformly positive emotions and behavior, whereas those perceived as lacking warmth and competence elicit uniform negativity. People classified as high on one dimension and low on the other elicit predictable, ambivalent affective and behavioral reactions. These universal dimensions explain both interpersonal and intergroup social cognition.

摘要

与所有感知一样,社会感知反映了进化压力。在与同类相遇时,群居动物必须立即判断“对方”是朋友还是敌人(即意图是善还是恶),然后判断“对方”是否有能力实施这些意图。新数据证实了社会认知的这两个普遍维度:热情和能力。这些维度促进了生存,提供了关于竞争和地位的基本社会结构答案。被视为热情且有能力的人会引发一致的积极情绪和行为,而那些被认为缺乏热情和能力的人则会引发一致的消极情绪。在一个维度上得分高而在另一个维度上得分低的人会引发可预测的矛盾情感和行为反应。这些普遍维度解释了人际和群体间的社会认知。

相似文献

1
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence.社会认知的普遍维度:热情与能力。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
2
A question of compensation: the social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception.补偿问题:社会认知基本维度的社会生活
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;96(4):828-42. doi: 10.1037/a0013320.
3
Influence of warmth and competence on the promotion of safe in-group selection: Stereotype content model and social categorization of faces.温暖与能力对促进安全的内群体选择的影响:刻板印象内容模型与面孔的社会分类
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(8):1464-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1084339. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
4
Primacy of warmth versus competence: a motivated bias?温暖优先于能力:一种有动机的偏见?
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;152(4):417-35. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.623735.
5
Affective judgement about information relating to competence and warmth: an embodied perspective.关于能力和热情相关信息的情感判断:一种具身认知视角。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(2):265-80. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12033. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.偏差地图:群体间情感与刻板印象产生的行为
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):631-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631.
7
Stereotyping based on voice in the presence of individuating information: vocal femininity affects perceived competence but not warmth.在存在个性化信息的情况下基于声音的刻板印象:声音的女性特质会影响感知到的能力,但不会影响温暖感。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Feb;35(2):198-211. doi: 10.1177/0146167208326477.
8
Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.社会判断的基本维度:理解能力判断与热情判断之间的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):899-913. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899.
9
Social stereotyping of left-handers in Serbia.塞尔维亚人对左撇子的社会刻板印象。
Laterality. 2013;18(6):719-29. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2012.755993. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
10
The development of stereotype content: The use of warmth and competence in assessing social groups.刻板印象内容的发展:在评估社会群体时对热情和能力的运用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning.社会不平等会扰乱基于奖励的学习。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Aug 16;3(1):125. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00300-y.
2
Neural systems for processing social relationship information along two principal dimensions.用于沿着两个主要维度处理社会关系信息的神经系统。
Commun Biol. 2025 Aug 6;8(1):1120. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08504-y.
3
Perceptions of Organizational Affect and Holistic Mental Health in United States Army Soldiers During and After Deployment.美国陆军士兵在部署期间及之后对组织情感和整体心理健康的认知
Stress Health. 2025 Aug;41(4):e70097. doi: 10.1002/smi.70097.
4
An extended Chinese social evaluative word list.一份扩展的中文社会评价词表。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 25;57(9):236. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02760-w.
5
The honesty behind tears: Situational, individual, and cultural influences on the perception of emotional tears as sincere.眼泪背后的诚实:情境、个体及文化因素对真诚情感泪水认知的影响
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0324954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324954. eCollection 2025.
6
Lay beliefs about AI assessment of interpersonal skills in personnel selection.关于人工智能在人员选拔中评估人际交往能力的大众观念。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 13;15(1):25317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10358-7.
7
Network models reveal high-dimensional social inferences in naturalistic settings beyond latent construct models.网络模型揭示了超越潜在结构模型的自然环境中的高维社会推理。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;3(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00275-w.
8
Who values competent minds and who likes warm hearts? The role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in shaping voter preferences for political candidates.谁看重有能力的头脑,谁喜欢温暖的心?右翼威权主义和社会支配取向在塑造选民对政治候选人的偏好中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e70004. doi: 10.1111/bjso.70004.
9
Lay representations of social class: A mixed methods approach to wealth-based group perceptions and stereotypes.社会阶层的大众认知:一种基于财富的群体认知与刻板印象的混合研究方法。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e70003. doi: 10.1111/bjso.70003.
10
Artificial intelligence chatbots as a source of virtual social support: Implications for loneliness and anxiety management.作为虚拟社会支持来源的人工智能聊天机器人:对孤独和焦虑管理的启示。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Jul;1549(1):148-159. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15400. Epub 2025 Jun 26.