• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者选择中的信息回避:回避倾向和动机是否随年龄而异?

Information Avoidance in Consumer Choice: Do Avoidance Tendencies and Motives Vary by Age?

机构信息

Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

出版信息

Exp Aging Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):112-129. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2051967. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1080/0361073X.2022.2051967
PMID:35311482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9485290/
Abstract

Prior research suggests that older adults seek less information in consumer choices than younger adults do. However, it remains unclear if intentional information avoidance plays a role in such effects. To test this possibility, we examined age differences in deliberate information avoidance in consumer decisions and explored a range of potential motives. Adult lifespan samples completed two pre-registered online studies, which assessed information avoidance using a slider scale (Study 1, =195) and a forced-choice task (Study 2, = 500). In Study 1, age differences in information avoidance were not significant, but methodological limitations could have obscured age effects. In Study 2, age was associated with higher information avoidance. Avoidance was higher among participants who reported that the information would not impact decision preferences, would elicit more negative affect, and would be useless. Although age was associated with lower perceived impact on decision preferences and lower concerns about affective responses, age differences in information avoidance remained significant when these variables were statistically controlled. In conclusion, in the context of consumer choices, deliberate information avoidance is higher among older consumers. Thus, interventions to promote the acquisition of relevant information would benefit from being tailored to the target age group.

摘要

先前的研究表明,老年人在消费者选择中比年轻人寻求的信息更少。然而,目前尚不清楚是否有意避免信息会对这些影响产生作用。为了检验这种可能性,我们研究了在消费者决策中有意避免信息的年龄差异,并探讨了一系列潜在的动机。成年人生命周期样本完成了两项预先注册的在线研究,这些研究使用滑动条(研究 1,N=195)和强制选择任务(研究 2,N=500)来评估信息回避。在研究 1 中,信息回避的年龄差异不显著,但方法学上的限制可能掩盖了年龄效应。在研究 2 中,年龄与更高的信息回避有关。那些报告信息不会影响决策偏好、会引起更多负面情绪且无用的参与者,回避信息的意愿更高。尽管年龄与对决策偏好的感知影响降低和对情感反应的担忧减少有关,但在对这些变量进行统计控制时,信息回避的年龄差异仍然显著。总之,在消费者选择的背景下,老年消费者更倾向于故意回避信息。因此,为促进相关信息的获取而采取的干预措施,应当根据目标年龄群体进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/9485290/d6b669c35be7/nihms-1789229-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/9485290/d6b669c35be7/nihms-1789229-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/9485290/d6b669c35be7/nihms-1789229-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Information Avoidance in Consumer Choice: Do Avoidance Tendencies and Motives Vary by Age?消费者选择中的信息回避:回避倾向和动机是否随年龄而异?
Exp Aging Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):112-129. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2051967. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
2
Age Differences in Media Consumption and Avoidance With Respect to COVID-19.年龄差异与新冠疫情期间的媒体接触和回避
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):e76-e82. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab123.
3
Factors affecting food choices of older adults from high and low socioeconomic groups: a discrete choice experiment.社会经济地位高低不同的老年人群体食物选择的影响因素:一项离散选择实验
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Apr;101(4):768-74. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.096776. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
Consumer Acceptance of Population-Level Intervention Strategies for Healthy Food Choices: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Perceived Fairness.消费者对健康食品选择的群体层面干预策略的接受度:感知有效性和感知公平性的作用。
Nutrients. 2015 Sep 15;7(9):7842-62. doi: 10.3390/nu7095370.
5
Preferences for choice across adulthood: age trajectories and potential mechanisms.成年后的选择偏好:年龄轨迹和潜在机制。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Sep;28(3):625-632. doi: 10.1037/a0031399. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
The influence of verbatim versus gist formatting on younger and older adults' information acquisition and decision-making.逐字记录与要点概括格式对年轻人和老年人信息获取及决策的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2022 Mar;37(2):197-209. doi: 10.1037/pag0000676. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
7
Aging and altruism in intertemporal choice.时间跨度选择中的老龄化与利他主义。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Mar;33(2):315-324. doi: 10.1037/pag0000223. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
Dread sensitivity in decisions about real and imagined electrical shocks does not vary by age.在关于真实和想象中的电击的决策中,恐惧敏感性不会因年龄而有所不同。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Dec;31(8):890-901. doi: 10.1037/pag0000136.
9
Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance.刺激冲突引发行为回避。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Dec;15(4):822-36. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0355-6.
10
Motives for consumer choice of traditional food and European food in mainland China.中国大陆消费者选择传统食品和欧洲食品的动机。
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.211. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in the Temporal Extension of Self-Continuity Over the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间自我连续性时间延伸的差异。
Self Identity. 2024;23(5-6):505-520. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2024.2400732. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
The effect of fear and situational motivation on online information avoidance: The case of COVID-19.恐惧和情境动机对在线信息回避的影响:以新冠疫情为例。
Int J Inf Manage. 2023 Apr;69:102596. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102596. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
3
Susceptibility to default effects does not differ by age.

本文引用的文献

1
Susceptibility to default effects does not differ by age.默认效应易感性不因年龄而异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1175-1187. doi: 10.1037/xge0001317. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
2
Is Reliance on the Affect Heuristic Associated With Age?对情感启发式的依赖与年龄有关吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Mar 3;77(3):482-492. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab126.
3
Age Differences in Media Consumption and Avoidance With Respect to COVID-19.年龄差异与新冠疫情期间的媒体接触和回避
默认效应易感性不因年龄而异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1175-1187. doi: 10.1037/xge0001317. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):e76-e82. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab123.
4
Age differences in deliberate ignorance.故意忽视的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):407-414. doi: 10.1037/pag0000603. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
How people decide what they want to know.人们如何决定他们想知道什么。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):14-19. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0793-1. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Age Differences in Intertemporal Choice: The Role of Task Type, Outcome Characteristics, and Covariates.年龄对时间偏好的影响:任务类型、结果特征和协变量的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz097.
7
Comparison of Three Measures of Shared Decision Making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE Scales.三种共享决策测量方法的比较:SDM 过程量表_4、CollaboRATE 和 SURE 量表。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):673-680. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19855951. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Closing your eyes to follow your heart: Avoiding information to protect a strong intuitive preference.闭目随心:避免信息干扰以保护强烈的直觉偏好。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):230-245. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000100. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
9
Aging and Decision-Making: A Conceptual Framework for Future Research - A Mini-Review.衰老与决策:未来研究的概念框架——综述
Gerontology. 2018;64(2):140-148. doi: 10.1159/000485247. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
Age-differences in cognitive flexibility when overcoming a preexisting bias through feedback.通过反馈克服既有偏差时认知灵活性的年龄差异。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Aug;40(6):586-594. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1398311. Epub 2017 Nov 21.