Law School, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Hobart, TAS, 7005, Australia.
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Mar;19(1):11-14. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10181-z. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
The Australian Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety acknowledged understaffing and substandard care in residential aged care and home care services, and recommendations were made that that the Australian Government should promote assistive technology within aged care. Robotic care assistants can provide care and companionship for the elderly-both in their own homes and within health and aged care institutions. Although more research is required into their use, studies indicate benefits, including enabling the elderly to live independently at home, assistance with medication and monitoring of safety. Nevertheless, there are inherent ethical challenges in the use of robots as carers, including loss of privacy, unwarranted restrictions on autonomy, lack of dignity, deception, and the exacerbation of loneliness. Ethics by design can counter these issues in development of robotics and clinical ethics committees have been put forward as a way of dealing with the ethical use of robotic care in healthcare institutions. In this paper I outline the ethical challenges of robotic care assistants and how these may be mediated in their design and use.
澳大利亚老年护理质量和安全皇家委员会承认,养老院和家庭护理服务存在人员配备不足和护理标准不达标问题,并建议澳大利亚政府在老年护理中推广辅助技术。机器人护理助理可以为老年人提供护理和陪伴,无论是在他们自己的家中还是在卫生和老年护理机构中。尽管需要对其使用进行更多的研究,但研究表明存在益处,包括使老年人能够在家中独立生活、帮助服药和监测安全。然而,在将机器人用作护理人员方面存在固有的伦理挑战,包括隐私丧失、对自主性的不当限制、缺乏尊严、欺骗以及孤独感加剧。通过设计进行伦理考量可以在机器人技术的发展中解决这些问题,临床伦理委员会已经被提出作为在医疗机构中使用机器人护理的一种处理方式。在本文中,我概述了机器人护理助理的伦理挑战,以及如何在其设计和使用中对这些挑战进行调解。