Suppr超能文献

院前创伤分诊对筛选需要紧急和专科创伤护理的老年人的准确性。

Accuracy of Prehospital Trauma Triage to Select Older Adults Requiring Urgent and Specialized Trauma Care.

作者信息

Coulombe Pascale, Tardif Pier-Alexandre, Nadeau Alexandra, Beaumont-Boileau Roxane, Malo Christian, Emond Marcel, Blanchard Pierre-Gilles, Moore Lynne, Mercier Eric

机构信息

VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable de l'Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.

Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé, Unité de recherche en Traumatologie - Urgences - Soins Intensifs, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2022 Jul;275:281-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.037. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a 5-step prehospital trauma triage protocol to identify older adults who require urgent and specialized trauma care using different age cut-offs to define an older adult (≥55, ≥65, and ≥75 y old).

METHODS

Prehospital and in-hospital medical records were reviewed for injured patients transported by an ambulance to an emergency department (ED) between November 11, 2016 and March 3, 2017 in Quebec City, Canada. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated to assess the accuracy of our prehospital trauma triage protocol to identify patients who required at least one urgent in-hospital trauma intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 822 patients were included of which 62.9% were ≥55 y old and 56.3% were female. Fall (65.8%) was the main trauma mechanism. Seventy-six (9.2%) patients required urgent trauma care. This proportion was similar regardless of age (8.9%-9.5%). The proportion of patients who needed to be transported to the level-1 trauma center as per the triage protocol tended to decrease with increasing age (20.6% [whole cohort], 15.3% [≥55 y old], 11.4% [≥65 y old], and 9.0% [≥75 y old]). The sensitivity of the protocol for steps 1, 2, and 3 was 56.6% (whole cohort) and 30.0% for patients aged ≥75 y. The specificity ranged between 83.1% (whole cohort) and 93.1% (≥75 y old).

CONCLUSIONS

Our prehospital trauma triage protocol has insufficient sensitivity to identify patients with urgent trauma care needs, particularly in older adults.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估一种五步院前创伤分诊方案的敏感性和特异性,该方案使用不同的年龄界限(≥55岁、≥65岁和≥75岁)来界定老年人,以识别需要紧急和专科创伤护理的老年人。

方法

回顾了2016年11月11日至2017年3月3日期间在加拿大魁北克市由救护车转运至急诊科(ED)的受伤患者的院前和院内医疗记录。计算敏感性和特异性,以评估我们的院前创伤分诊方案识别至少需要一项紧急院内创伤干预患者的准确性。

结果

共纳入822例患者,其中62.9%年龄≥55岁,56.3%为女性。跌倒(65.8%)是主要的创伤机制。76例(9.2%)患者需要紧急创伤护理。无论年龄如何,这一比例相似(8.9%-9.5%)。根据分诊方案需要转运至一级创伤中心的患者比例随年龄增加而趋于下降(整个队列中为20.6%,≥55岁者为15.3%,≥65岁者为11.4%,≥75岁者为9.0%)。该方案第1、2和3步的敏感性在整个队列中为56.6%,≥75岁患者为30.0%。特异性在83.1%(整个队列)至93.1%(≥75岁)之间。

结论

我们的院前创伤分诊方案在识别有紧急创伤护理需求的患者方面敏感性不足,尤其是在老年人中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验