Suppr超能文献

评估股骨颈骨折后股骨头血供的意义:一种股骨颈骨折的新分类

The Significance of Evaluating the Femoral Head Blood Supply after Femoral Neck Fracture: A New Classification for Femoral Neck Fractures.

作者信息

Zhao Dewei, Wang Zihua, Cheng Liangliang, Tian Simiao, Liu Baoyi, Yang Lei, Ma Zhijie

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.

First Clinical Medical College, Jilin University, Jilin, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2022 Apr;14(4):742-749. doi: 10.1111/os.13241. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare a new classification with the Garden classification by exploring their relationships with vascular injury.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 73 patients with subcapital femoral neck fracture from July 2015 to November 2018, including 32 males and 41 females with an average age of 47.2 years. All patients were classified by the Garden classification using anteroposterior X-ray imaging and by a new classification system based on three-dimensional CT imaging. The blood supply of the affected femoral head in these patients was evaluated based on DSA images. Correlations between the two classifications and the degree of vascular injury were assessed.

RESULTS

The results of the DSA examination indicated that eight patients had no retinacular vessel injury, 20 patients had one retinacular vessel injury, 35 patients had two retinacular vessel injuries, and 10 patients had three retinacular vessel injuries. The degree of vascular injury was used to match the two fracture classifications. Forty-nine Garden classifications (Type I-IV: 8, 12, 23, 6, respectively, 67.12%) and 66 new classifications (Type I-IV: 8, 20, 32, 6, respectively, 90.41%) corresponded to the degree of vascular injury (p < 0.05). The Garden classification showed moderate reliability, and the new classification showed near perfect agreement (Interobserver agreement of k = 0.564 [0.01] in Garden classification vs. Garden classification k = 0.902 [0.01] for the five observers).

CONCLUSIONS

The new classification system can accurately describe the degree of fracture displacement and judge the extent of vascular injury.

摘要

目的

通过探索新分类法与Garden分类法和血管损伤之间的关系,对两者进行比较。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年7月至2018年11月间73例股骨颈头下型骨折患者,其中男性32例,女性41例,平均年龄47.2岁。所有患者均通过前后位X线成像采用Garden分类法,并通过基于三维CT成像的新分类系统进行分类。根据DSA图像评估这些患者患侧股骨头的血供情况。评估两种分类法与血管损伤程度之间的相关性。

结果

DSA检查结果显示,8例患者没有支持带动脉损伤,20例患者有1条支持带动脉损伤,35例患者有2条支持带动脉损伤,10例患者有3条支持带动脉损伤。用血管损伤程度来匹配两种骨折分类法。49个Garden分类(I-IV型分别为8例、12例、23例、6例,占67.12%)和66个新分类(I-IV型分别为8例、20例、32例、6例,占90.41%)与血管损伤程度相对应(p < 0.05)。Garden分类法显示出中等可靠性,新分类法显示出近乎完美的一致性(五位观察者之间,Garden分类法的观察者间一致性k = 0.564 [0.01],而新分类法的观察者间一致性k = 0.902 [0.01])。

结论

新分类系统能够准确描述骨折移位程度并判断血管损伤范围。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验