Liu Yawen, Cui Qi, Liu Yu, Zhang Jinzhu, Zhou Meifang, Ali Tariq, Yang Lingyu, Feng Kuishuang, Hubacek Klaus, Li Xinbei
Institute of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 2021 Dec;59:482-495. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
The effectiveness of different countermeasures to economic crisis from the public health emergency is still inadequately understood. We establish an illustrative scenario, specifying the shocks of COVID-19 pandemic and countermeasures applying a general equilibrium model to analyze the effectiveness of countermeasures with a particular focus on trade-offs in the impacts of monetary and fiscal policies. We find that both monetary and fiscal countermeasures could effectively mitigate the economic damages to GDP and employment. However, they would also produce adverse side-effects such as an increase in consumer price by 1.05% and 0.57%, respectively, and a decline in exports by 2.61% and 1.05%, respectively. Monetary policies would exacerbate the damages to external demand by supply-side shocks of the pandemic, but they are more suitable for mitigating demand-side shocks. While fiscal policies would benefit nearly all producing sectors, monetary policies would mainly affect export-oriented manufacturing sectors negatively.
对于公共卫生突发事件中不同应对经济危机措施的有效性,我们仍了解不足。我们构建了一个说明性情景,明确了新冠疫情的冲击以及应对措施,运用一般均衡模型来分析应对措施的有效性,特别关注货币和财政政策影响中的权衡取舍。我们发现,货币和财政应对措施都能有效减轻对国内生产总值(GDP)和就业的经济损害。然而,它们也会产生不利的副作用,比如消费者价格分别上涨1.05%和0.57%,出口分别下降2.61%和1.05%。货币政策会因疫情的供给侧冲击而加剧对外部需求的损害,但它们更适合缓解需求侧冲击。虽然财政政策会使几乎所有生产部门受益,但货币政策主要会对出口导向型制造业部门产生负面影响。