Steinmair Dagmar, Zervos Katharina, Wong Guoruey, Löffler-Stastka Henriette
Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
Department of Internal Medicine I, KRH Klinikum Robert-Koch-Gehrden, Gehrden 30989, Germany.
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 19;12(2):323-337. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i2.323.
Healthcare professionals need to be prepared to promote healthy lifestyles and care for patients. By focusing on what students should be able to perform one day as clinicians, we can bridge the gap between mere theoretical knowledge and its practical application. Gender aspects in clinical medicine also have to be considered when speaking of personalized medicine and learning curricula.
To determine sets of intellectual, personal, social, and emotional abilities that comprise core qualifications in medicine for performing well in anamnesis-taking, in order to identify training needs.
An analysis of training clinicians' conceptions with respect to optimal medical history taking was performed. The chosen study design also aimed to assess gender effects. Structured interviews with supervising clinicians were carried out in a descriptive study at the Medical University of Vienna. Results were analyzed by conducting a qualitative computer-assisted content analysis of the interviews. Inductive category formation was applied. The main questions posed to the supervisors dealt with (1) Observed competencies of students in medical history taking; and (2) The supervisor's own conceptions of "ideal medical history taking".
A total of 33 training clinicians ( = 33), engaged in supervising medical students according to the MedUni Vienna's curriculum standards, agreed to be enrolled in the study and met inclusion criteria. The qualitative content analysis revealed the following themes relevant to taking an anamnesis: (1) Knowledge; (2) Soft skills (relationship-building abilities, trust, and attitude); (3) Methodical skills (structuring, precision, and completeness of information gathering); and (4) Environmental/contextual factors (language barrier, time pressure, interruptions). Overall, health care professionals consider empathy and attitude as critical features concerning the quality of medical history taking. When looking at physicians' theoretical conceptions, more general practitioners and psychiatrists mentioned attitude and empathy in the context of "ideal medical history taking", with a higher percentage of females. With respect to observations of students' history taking, a positive impact from attitude and empathy was mainly described by male health care professionals, whereas no predominance of specialty was found. Representatives of general medicine and internal medicine, when observing medical students, more often emphasized a negative impact on history taking when students lacked attitude or showed non-empathetic behavior; no gender-specific difference was detected for this finding.
The analysis reveals that for clinicians engaged in medical student education, only a combination of skills, including adequate knowledge and methodical implementations, is supposed to guarantee acceptable performance. This study's findings support the importance of concepts like relationship building, attitude, and empathy. However, there may be contextual factors in play as well, and transference of theoretical concepts into the clinical setting might prove challenging.
医疗保健专业人员需要做好准备,以促进健康的生活方式并照顾患者。通过关注学生未来作为临床医生应具备的能力,我们可以弥合单纯理论知识与其实际应用之间的差距。在谈及个性化医疗和学习课程时,还必须考虑临床医学中的性别因素。
确定构成医学核心资质的一系列智力、个人、社交和情感能力,以便在问诊过程中表现出色,从而确定培训需求。
对培训临床医生关于最佳病史采集的观念进行分析。所选用的研究设计还旨在评估性别影响。在维也纳医科大学的一项描述性研究中,对指导临床医生进行了结构化访谈。通过对访谈进行定性计算机辅助内容分析来分析结果。采用归纳类别形成法。向指导教师提出的主要问题涉及:(1)观察到的学生在病史采集中的能力;(2)指导教师自己对“理想病史采集”的观念。
共有33名培训临床医生(n = 33),根据维也纳医科大学的课程标准参与指导医学生,同意参与该研究并符合纳入标准。定性内容分析揭示了与问诊相关的以下主题:(1)知识;(2)软技能(建立关系的能力、信任和态度);(3)方法技能(信息收集的结构化、精确性和完整性);以及(4)环境/背景因素(语言障碍、时间压力、干扰)。总体而言,医疗保健专业人员认为同理心和态度是病史采集质量的关键特征。在审视医生的理论观念时,更多的全科医生和精神科医生在“理想病史采集”的背景下提到了态度和同理心,女性的比例更高。关于对学生病史采集的观察,男性医疗保健专业人员主要描述了态度和同理心产生的积极影响,而未发现专业上的优势。普通医学和内科的代表在观察医学生时,更常强调当学生缺乏态度或表现出缺乏同理心的行为时,对病史采集会产生负面影响;这一发现未检测到性别差异。
分析表明,对于从事医学生教育的临床医生而言,只有包括足够知识和方法实施在内的技能组合才能保证可接受的表现。本研究的结果支持了诸如建立关系、态度和同理心等概念的重要性。然而,可能也存在背景因素在起作用,将理论概念转化到临床环境中可能具有挑战性。