• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沟通在医疗实践和医学教育中的重要性:强调同理心、态度及其可能产生的影响。

Importance of communication in medical practice and medical education: An emphasis on empathy and attitudes and their possible influences.

作者信息

Steinmair Dagmar, Zervos Katharina, Wong Guoruey, Löffler-Stastka Henriette

机构信息

Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.

Department of Internal Medicine I, KRH Klinikum Robert-Koch-Gehrden, Gehrden 30989, Germany.

出版信息

World J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 19;12(2):323-337. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i2.323.

DOI:10.5498/wjp.v12.i2.323
PMID:35317334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8900587/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare professionals need to be prepared to promote healthy lifestyles and care for patients. By focusing on what students should be able to perform one day as clinicians, we can bridge the gap between mere theoretical knowledge and its practical application. Gender aspects in clinical medicine also have to be considered when speaking of personalized medicine and learning curricula.

AIM

To determine sets of intellectual, personal, social, and emotional abilities that comprise core qualifications in medicine for performing well in anamnesis-taking, in order to identify training needs.

METHODS

An analysis of training clinicians' conceptions with respect to optimal medical history taking was performed. The chosen study design also aimed to assess gender effects. Structured interviews with supervising clinicians were carried out in a descriptive study at the Medical University of Vienna. Results were analyzed by conducting a qualitative computer-assisted content analysis of the interviews. Inductive category formation was applied. The main questions posed to the supervisors dealt with (1) Observed competencies of students in medical history taking; and (2) The supervisor's own conceptions of "ideal medical history taking".

RESULTS

A total of 33 training clinicians ( = 33), engaged in supervising medical students according to the MedUni Vienna's curriculum standards, agreed to be enrolled in the study and met inclusion criteria. The qualitative content analysis revealed the following themes relevant to taking an anamnesis: (1) Knowledge; (2) Soft skills (relationship-building abilities, trust, and attitude); (3) Methodical skills (structuring, precision, and completeness of information gathering); and (4) Environmental/contextual factors (language barrier, time pressure, interruptions). Overall, health care professionals consider empathy and attitude as critical features concerning the quality of medical history taking. When looking at physicians' theoretical conceptions, more general practitioners and psychiatrists mentioned attitude and empathy in the context of "ideal medical history taking", with a higher percentage of females. With respect to observations of students' history taking, a positive impact from attitude and empathy was mainly described by male health care professionals, whereas no predominance of specialty was found. Representatives of general medicine and internal medicine, when observing medical students, more often emphasized a negative impact on history taking when students lacked attitude or showed non-empathetic behavior; no gender-specific difference was detected for this finding.

CONCLUSION

The analysis reveals that for clinicians engaged in medical student education, only a combination of skills, including adequate knowledge and methodical implementations, is supposed to guarantee acceptable performance. This study's findings support the importance of concepts like relationship building, attitude, and empathy. However, there may be contextual factors in play as well, and transference of theoretical concepts into the clinical setting might prove challenging.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b4/8900587/9244271155b9/WJP-12-323-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b4/8900587/4bf334be9182/WJP-12-323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b4/8900587/a4dd1a204aa9/WJP-12-323-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b4/8900587/9244271155b9/WJP-12-323-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b4/8900587/4bf334be9182/WJP-12-323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b4/8900587/a4dd1a204aa9/WJP-12-323-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b4/8900587/9244271155b9/WJP-12-323-g003.jpg
摘要

背景

医疗保健专业人员需要做好准备,以促进健康的生活方式并照顾患者。通过关注学生未来作为临床医生应具备的能力,我们可以弥合单纯理论知识与其实际应用之间的差距。在谈及个性化医疗和学习课程时,还必须考虑临床医学中的性别因素。

目的

确定构成医学核心资质的一系列智力、个人、社交和情感能力,以便在问诊过程中表现出色,从而确定培训需求。

方法

对培训临床医生关于最佳病史采集的观念进行分析。所选用的研究设计还旨在评估性别影响。在维也纳医科大学的一项描述性研究中,对指导临床医生进行了结构化访谈。通过对访谈进行定性计算机辅助内容分析来分析结果。采用归纳类别形成法。向指导教师提出的主要问题涉及:(1)观察到的学生在病史采集中的能力;(2)指导教师自己对“理想病史采集”的观念。

结果

共有33名培训临床医生(n = 33),根据维也纳医科大学的课程标准参与指导医学生,同意参与该研究并符合纳入标准。定性内容分析揭示了与问诊相关的以下主题:(1)知识;(2)软技能(建立关系的能力、信任和态度);(3)方法技能(信息收集的结构化、精确性和完整性);以及(4)环境/背景因素(语言障碍、时间压力、干扰)。总体而言,医疗保健专业人员认为同理心和态度是病史采集质量的关键特征。在审视医生的理论观念时,更多的全科医生和精神科医生在“理想病史采集”的背景下提到了态度和同理心,女性的比例更高。关于对学生病史采集的观察,男性医疗保健专业人员主要描述了态度和同理心产生的积极影响,而未发现专业上的优势。普通医学和内科的代表在观察医学生时,更常强调当学生缺乏态度或表现出缺乏同理心的行为时,对病史采集会产生负面影响;这一发现未检测到性别差异。

结论

分析表明,对于从事医学生教育的临床医生而言,只有包括足够知识和方法实施在内的技能组合才能保证可接受的表现。本研究的结果支持了诸如建立关系、态度和同理心等概念的重要性。然而,可能也存在背景因素在起作用,将理论概念转化到临床环境中可能具有挑战性。

相似文献

1
Importance of communication in medical practice and medical education: An emphasis on empathy and attitudes and their possible influences.沟通在医疗实践和医学教育中的重要性:强调同理心、态度及其可能产生的影响。
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 19;12(2):323-337. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i2.323.
2
Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations.改善医学生医患沟通技能的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 8;2(2):CD012418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012418.pub2.
3
Competency in medical history taking-the training physicians' view.病史采集能力——实习医生的观点。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019 Jan;131(1-2):17-22. doi: 10.1007/s00508-018-1431-z. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
5
Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?医学生对虚拟病人会做出共情反应吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.021.
6
Influences on students' empathy in medical education: an exploratory interview study with medical students in their third and last year.医学教育中学生同理心的影响:对三年级和最后一年医学生的探索性访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Oct 5;18(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1335-7.
7
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
8
What Do Medical Students Do and Want When Caring for "Difficult Patients"?医学生在照顾“难缠患者”时做什么和想要什么?
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Jun-Jul;31(3):238-249. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1534693. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Instrumental strategy: A stage in students' consultation skills training? Observations and reflections on students' communication in general practice consultations.工具性策略:学生咨询技能培训的一个阶段?对学生在全科医疗咨询中的沟通情况的观察与思考
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005 Sep;23(3):164-70. doi: 10.1080/02813430510018646.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent profile analysis of empathy for pain and its associations with coping styles among nurses in China.中国护士疼痛共情的潜在剖面分析及其与应对方式的关联
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 2;15(9):e101039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101039.
2
ChatGPT as a Virtual Patient: Written Empathic Expressions During Medical History Taking.ChatGPT作为虚拟患者:病史采集过程中的书面共情表达。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Feb 27;35(3):1513-1522. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02342-7. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Multiple Mini Interviews vs Traditional Interviews: Investigating Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Interview Processes.

本文引用的文献

1
Mind reading improvements in mentalization-based therapy training.基于心理化的治疗训练中读心能力的改善。
Bull Menninger Clin. 2021 Winter;85(1):59-82. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2021.85.1.59.
2
Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations.改善医学生医患沟通技能的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 8;2(2):CD012418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012418.pub2.
3
Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Compassion Satisfaction as Risk/Protective Factors from Burnout and Compassion Fatigue in Healthcare and Education Professionals.
多次小型面试与传统面试:探究面试过程中的种族和社会经济差异
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Feb 4;16:157-163. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S480717. eCollection 2025.
4
Clinical, scientific and stakeholders' caring about identity perturbations.临床、科研人员以及利益相关者对身份认同紊乱的关注。
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 19;14(10):1422-1428. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i10.1422.
5
Cognitive dissonance and mindset perturbations during crisis: "eco-socio-psycho-somatic" perspectives.危机期间的认知失调与思维模式扰动:“生态 - 社会 - 心理 - 躯体”视角
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):215-224. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i2.215.
6
Dialectical materialism and teaching by words and deeds applied to the education of clinical medical students.辩证唯物主义及言传身教应用于临床医学专业学生的教育中。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 24;10:1037101. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1037101. eCollection 2023.
7
Role of narrative medicine-based education in cultivating empathy in residents.叙事医学教育在培养住院医师同理心中的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04096-5.
感觉处理敏感性和同情心满足作为医疗保健和教育专业人员从倦怠和同情心疲劳中的风险/保护因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020611.
4
The Effectiveness of Patient-Centred Medical Home-Based Models of Care versus Standard Primary Care in Chronic Disease Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials.以患者为中心的医疗之家模式与标准初级保健在慢性病管理中的效果比较:随机和非随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21;17(18):6886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186886.
5
A price tag on clinical empathy? Factors influencing its cost-effectiveness.临床同理心有价格标签吗?影响其成本效益的因素。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Oct;113(10):389-393. doi: 10.1177/0141076820945272. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review.急诊医学医生的职业倦怠:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21462. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021462.
7
Episodic mindreading: Mentalizing guided by scene construction of imagined and remembered events.情景式心理解读:基于想象和记忆事件构建场景的心理推测。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104325. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104325. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Core competencies for health headquarters: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.卫生总部的核心能力:系统评价和元综合。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08884-2.
9
The impact of peer attachment on prosocial behavior, emotional difficulties and conduct problems in adolescence: The mediating role of empathy.同伴依恋对青少年亲社会行为、情绪困难和行为问题的影响:共情的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 10;15(1):e0227627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227627. eCollection 2020.
10
Intersections and Divergences Between Empathizing and Mentalizing: Development, Recent Advancements by Neuroimaging and the Future of Animal Modeling.共情与心理化之间的交叉与分歧:发展、神经影像学的最新进展及动物模型的未来
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Sep 13;13:212. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00212. eCollection 2019.