Suppr超能文献

在非母语语音对比的产出与感知中语音线索使用的个体差异。

Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.

作者信息

Schertz Jessamyn, Cho Taehong, Lotto Andrew, Warner Natasha

机构信息

Centre for French and Linguistics, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, HW413, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.

Hanyang Phonetics and Psycholinguistics Lab, #104, College of Humanities, Hanyang University, Seoul (133-791), Korea.

出版信息

J Phon. 2015 Sep 1;52:183-204. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003.

Abstract

The current work examines native Korean speakers' perception and production of stop contrasts in their native language (L1, Korean) and second language (L2, English), focusing on three acoustic dimensions that are all used, albeit to different extents, in both languages: voice onset time (VOT), f0 at vowel onset, and closure duration. Participants used all three cues to distinguish the L1 Korean three-way stop distinction in both production and perception. Speakers' productions of the L2 English contrasts were reliably distinguished using both VOT and f0 (even though f0 is only a very weak cue to the English contrast), and, to a lesser extent, closure duration. In contrast to the relative homogeneity of the L2 productions, group patterns on a forced-choice perception task were less clear-cut, due to considerable individual differences in perceptual categorization strategies, with listeners using either primarily VOT duration, primarily f0, or both dimensions equally to distinguish the L2 English contrast. Differences in perception, which were stable across experimental sessions, were not predicted by individual variation in production patterns. This work suggests that reliance on multiple cues in representation of a phonetic contrast can form the basis for distinct individual cue-weighting strategies in phonetic categorization.

摘要

当前的研究考察了以韩语为母语者在其母语(第一语言,韩语)和第二语言(第二语言,英语)中对塞音对比的感知和产出,重点关注在这两种语言中都被使用(尽管程度不同)的三个声学维度:嗓音起始时间(VOT)、元音起始时的基频(f0)和闭塞时长。参与者在产出和感知中都使用这三个线索来区分第一语言韩语中的三元塞音区别。使用VOT和f0(尽管f0对英语对比来说只是一个非常微弱的线索),以及在较小程度上使用闭塞时长,能够可靠地区分第二语言英语对比的发音。与第二语言发音的相对同质性形成对比的是,在强制选择感知任务中的群体模式不太明确,这是由于感知分类策略存在相当大的个体差异,听众要么主要使用VOT时长,要么主要使用f0,要么同等程度地使用这两个维度来区分第二语言英语对比。在不同实验环节中稳定存在的感知差异,并不能由发音模式的个体差异预测。这项研究表明,在语音对比表征中依赖多个线索可以为语音分类中不同的个体线索加权策略奠定基础。

相似文献

2
Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jan;78(1):355-67. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0987-1.
4
Brainstem and early cortical auditory activities associated with language differences in acoustic cue weighting for voicing perception.
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Sep 14;735:135154. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135154. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Individual Differences in Categorical Judgment of L2 Stops: A Link to Proficiency and Acoustic Cue-Weighting.
Lang Speech. 2023 Jun;66(2):354-380. doi: 10.1177/00238309221108647. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Phonetic Encoding of Coda Voicing Contrast under Different Focus Conditions in L1 vs. L2 English.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 13;7:624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00624. eCollection 2016.
9
Individual differences in processing non-speech acoustic signals influence cue weighting strategies for L2 speech contrasts.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Aug;51(4):903-916. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09869-5. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Speech Perception is Speech Learning.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2025 Aug;34(4):218-224. doi: 10.1177/09637214251318726. Epub 2025 Apr 6.
3
Voice register in Mon: experiments in production and perception.
Phonetica. 2025 May 28;82(3):181-233. doi: 10.1515/phon-2024-0047. Print 2025 Jun 26.
4
Relating production and perception in two Raglai dialects at different stages of registrogenesis.
Phonetica. 2025 Jan 20;82(1):87-110. doi: 10.1515/phon-2024-0032. Print 2025 Feb 25.
5
Mapping the spectrotemporal regions influencing perception of French stop consonants in noise.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 8;14(1):27183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77634-w.
6
Extensive residence in a second language environment modifies perceptual strategies for suprasegmental categorization.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Dec;49(12):1943-1955. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001246.
8
Transfer of statistical learning from passive speech perception to speech production.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1193-1205. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02399-8. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
9
Individual variability in subcortical neural encoding shapes phonetic cue weighting.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 20;13(1):9991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37212-y.
10
Statistical learning across passive listening adjusts perceptual weights of speech input dimensions.
Cognition. 2023 Sep;238:105473. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105473. Epub 2023 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jan;78(1):355-67. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0987-1.
4
Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):EL19-25. doi: 10.1121/1.4807431.
5
Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: the case of Japanese stop lengths.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Dec;132(6):3950-64. doi: 10.1121/1.4765076.
6
Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL95-101. doi: 10.1121/1.4736711.
8
Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):456-65. doi: 10.1121/1.3445785.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验