Schertz Jessamyn, Cho Taehong, Lotto Andrew, Warner Natasha
Centre for French and Linguistics, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, HW413, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.
Hanyang Phonetics and Psycholinguistics Lab, #104, College of Humanities, Hanyang University, Seoul (133-791), Korea.
J Phon. 2015 Sep 1;52:183-204. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003.
The current work examines native Korean speakers' perception and production of stop contrasts in their native language (L1, Korean) and second language (L2, English), focusing on three acoustic dimensions that are all used, albeit to different extents, in both languages: voice onset time (VOT), f0 at vowel onset, and closure duration. Participants used all three cues to distinguish the L1 Korean three-way stop distinction in both production and perception. Speakers' productions of the L2 English contrasts were reliably distinguished using both VOT and f0 (even though f0 is only a very weak cue to the English contrast), and, to a lesser extent, closure duration. In contrast to the relative homogeneity of the L2 productions, group patterns on a forced-choice perception task were less clear-cut, due to considerable individual differences in perceptual categorization strategies, with listeners using either primarily VOT duration, primarily f0, or both dimensions equally to distinguish the L2 English contrast. Differences in perception, which were stable across experimental sessions, were not predicted by individual variation in production patterns. This work suggests that reliance on multiple cues in representation of a phonetic contrast can form the basis for distinct individual cue-weighting strategies in phonetic categorization.
当前的研究考察了以韩语为母语者在其母语(第一语言,韩语)和第二语言(第二语言,英语)中对塞音对比的感知和产出,重点关注在这两种语言中都被使用(尽管程度不同)的三个声学维度:嗓音起始时间(VOT)、元音起始时的基频(f0)和闭塞时长。参与者在产出和感知中都使用这三个线索来区分第一语言韩语中的三元塞音区别。使用VOT和f0(尽管f0对英语对比来说只是一个非常微弱的线索),以及在较小程度上使用闭塞时长,能够可靠地区分第二语言英语对比的发音。与第二语言发音的相对同质性形成对比的是,在强制选择感知任务中的群体模式不太明确,这是由于感知分类策略存在相当大的个体差异,听众要么主要使用VOT时长,要么主要使用f0,要么同等程度地使用这两个维度来区分第二语言英语对比。在不同实验环节中稳定存在的感知差异,并不能由发音模式的个体差异预测。这项研究表明,在语音对比表征中依赖多个线索可以为语音分类中不同的个体线索加权策略奠定基础。