• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用哥伦比亚卫生系统的管理数据对查尔森合并症指数进行验证与调整:回顾性队列研究

Validation and adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index using administrative data from the Colombian health system: retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Oliveros Henry, Buitrago Giancarlo

机构信息

PhD Program in Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. (PhD cand.), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia

Facultad de medicina Departamento de Epidemiologia, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Colombia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e054058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054058.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054058
PMID:35321892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8943719/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) for the Colombian population using administrative databases from the health insurance system.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Database reports of events related to services that insurers provided (Health Promoter Enterprises, EPS in Spanish) in the Colombian health system, which covered 22.19 million residents in 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

The study cohort comprised 3 849 849 patients aged 18 years and up admitted to the Colombian hospitals between 1 January and 31 December 2016.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

The study aimed to gauge the CCI's predictive value for mortality by comparing the calibration and discrimination of three different versions of the index, with mortality information obtained from death certificates, including date of death and diagnoses associated with cause of death. Follow-up was conducted for at least 1 year.

RESULTS

Altogether, 46 429 patients died within 1 year (1.21%). Discriminatory power in predicting 1-year mortality was calculated for three versions of the ICC. In the original CCI model, the area under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.906 (95% CI (0.906 to 0.907), p<0.001). In the version for Colombia, it was 0.908 (95% CI (0.908 to 0.909), p<0.001) and for the new model it was 0.909 (95% CI (0.908 to 0.910), p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adapting the CCI based on the 14 predictive variables of the new model resulted in an adequate predictive value for 1-year mortality in patients who were hospitalised for all causes. These findings support the use of the modified CCI in the Colombian population.

摘要

目的

利用医疗保险系统的行政数据库验证哥伦比亚人群的查尔森合并症指数(CCI)。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

背景

哥伦比亚卫生系统中保险公司提供服务相关事件的数据库报告(西班牙语为健康促进企业,EPS),2016年覆盖2219万居民。

参与者

研究队列包括2016年1月1日至12月31日期间入住哥伦比亚医院的3849849名18岁及以上患者。

主要结局

该研究旨在通过比较该指数三个不同版本的校准和辨别力,利用从死亡证明获得的死亡信息(包括死亡日期和与死因相关的诊断)来评估CCI对死亡率的预测价值。随访至少1年。

结果

共有46429名患者在1年内死亡(1.21%)。计算了ICC三个版本预测1年死亡率的辨别力。在原始CCI模型中,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.906(95%CI(0.906至0.907),p<0.001)。在哥伦比亚版本中,为0.908(95%CI(0.908至0.909),p<0.001),新模型为0.909(95%CI(0.908至0.910),p<0.001)。

结论

基于新模型的14个预测变量调整CCI,对因各种原因住院的患者1年死亡率具有足够的预测价值。这些发现支持在哥伦比亚人群中使用改良的CCI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/b6aa5c5f1f91/bmjopen-2021-054058f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/1ba20690bf05/bmjopen-2021-054058f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/73e45c14bb55/bmjopen-2021-054058f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/08bce605367d/bmjopen-2021-054058f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/b6aa5c5f1f91/bmjopen-2021-054058f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/1ba20690bf05/bmjopen-2021-054058f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/73e45c14bb55/bmjopen-2021-054058f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/08bce605367d/bmjopen-2021-054058f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be05/8943719/b6aa5c5f1f91/bmjopen-2021-054058f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation and adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index using administrative data from the Colombian health system: retrospective cohort study.利用哥伦比亚卫生系统的管理数据对查尔森合并症指数进行验证与调整:回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e054058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054058.
2
The risk-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index as a new predictor of one-year mortality rate in elderly Chinese patients who underwent hip fracture surgery.风险调整后的 Charlson 合并症指数作为老年髋部骨折手术患者一年死亡率的新预测因子。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102860. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102860. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Predicting in-hospital mortality for dementia patients after hip fracture surgery - A comparison between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.预测髋部骨折手术后痴呆患者的院内死亡率 - Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)与 Elixhauser 合并症指数的比较。
J Orthop Sci. 2021 May;26(3):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Validation study of Charlson Comorbidity Index in predicting mortality in Chinese older adults.老年人群Charlson 共病指数预测死亡率的验证研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014 Apr;14(2):452-7. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12129. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
5
Predictive Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Hospital Mortality Decreases With Increasing Comorbidity Burden Among Patients Admitted for Suspected Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染入院患者的住院死亡率预测准确性随合并症负担的增加而降低。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1081-1088. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003815.
6
Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care.比较 Charlson 合并症指数与 SAPS 和 APACHE 评分对 ICU 后死亡率的预测
Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:203-11. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S20247. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
7
Comparison of the Charlson Comorbidity Index with the ASA score for predicting 12-month mortality in acute hip fracture.比较 Charlson 合并症指数与 ASA 评分对急性髋部骨折 12 个月死亡率的预测作用。
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):1004-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.074. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Development and validation of an ICD-10-based disability predictive index for patients admitted to hospitals with trauma.基于国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的创伤入院患者残疾预测指数的开发与验证
Injury. 2018 Mar;49(3):556-563. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
Charlson Comorbidity Index is Associated With Longer-Term Mortality and Re-Admissions Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.查尔森合并症指数与冠状动脉搭桥术后的长期死亡率和再入院率相关。
J Surg Res. 2022 Jul;275:300-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
10
[A 180-day mortality predictive score based on frailty syndrome in elderly patients with sepsis: a Logistic regression analysis model].基于脓毒症老年患者衰弱综合征的180天死亡率预测评分:Logistic回归分析模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):257-262. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201027-00688.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of healthcare fragmentation with three-year survival among kidney transplant recipients in Colombia.哥伦比亚肾移植受者医疗服务碎片化与三年生存率的关联
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0316418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316418. eCollection 2025.
2
Is a History of Malignant Melanoma Associated with Subsequent Vitiligo? Insights from a Population-Based Case-Control Study.恶性黑色素瘤病史与随后发生的白癜风有关吗?一项基于人群的病例对照研究的见解。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):5546. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155546.
3
Socioeconomic inequalities of 3-year survival in formal employees with colorectal cancer between 2012 and 2019 in Colombia.

本文引用的文献

1
Recalibration and validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in an Asian population: the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort study.在亚洲人群中重新校准和验证 Charlson 合并症指数:国家健康保险服务-国家样本队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70624-8.
2
Administrative data provide vital research evidence for maximizing health-system performance and outcomes.行政数据为最大化卫生系统绩效和成果提供了至关重要的研究证据。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;13(3):111-114. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12644. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available.
2012年至2019年哥伦比亚正式员工结直肠癌3年生存率的社会经济不平等情况。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0316061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316061. eCollection 2025.
4
Prevalence, comorbidities, and disease-related complications of rheumatoid arthritis in Colombia: a national cross-sectional study based on administrative claims data.哥伦比亚类风湿关节炎的患病率、合并症及疾病相关并发症:一项基于行政索赔数据的全国横断面研究
Adv Rheumatol. 2025 Jan 27;65(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42358-025-00437-8.
5
Comprehensive Gerontological Assessment: An Update on the Concept and Its Evaluation Tools in Latin America and the Caribbean-A Literature Review.综合老年医学评估:拉丁美洲和加勒比地区概念及其评估工具的最新情况——文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;21(12):1697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121697.
6
Variables Associated With In-Hospital Lethality in COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study From Colombia.与新冠病毒肺炎院内致死率相关的变量:来自哥伦比亚的一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2024 Sep 13;16(9):e69368. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69368. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
External Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index-based Model for Survival Prediction in Thai Patients Diagnosed with Dementia.基于 Charlson 共病指数的模型对泰国痴呆症患者生存预测的外部验证。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05238-0.
8
Loneliness as a predictor of mortality in cancer patients, a cohort study.孤独感预测癌症患者死亡率:一项队列研究。
Biomedica. 2024 May 31;44(Sp. 1):119-138. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.7150.
9
One-year survival of patients admitted for sepsis to intensive care units in Colombia.哥伦比亚重症监护病房收治脓毒症患者的一年生存率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09584-7.
10
General Hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit-Related Factors of COVID-19 Patients in Northeastern Colombia: Baseline Characteristics of a Cohort Study.哥伦比亚东北部新冠病毒肺炎患者的综合住院及重症监护病房相关因素:一项队列研究的基线特征
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43888. eCollection 2023 Aug.
在没有随机试验时使用大数据模拟目标试验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv254. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
4
The Best Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality.使用查尔森合并症指数结合电子医疗数据库预测死亡率的最佳方法。
Med Care. 2016 Feb;54(2):188-94. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000471.
5
Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data.基于行政数据的合并症指数的系统评价
Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1109-18. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825f64d0.
6
Development and validation of comorbidity index in South Korea.韩国共病指数的制定与验证。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):391-402. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs027. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
7
Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment.风险预测模型:二、外部验证、模型更新和影响评估。
Heart. 2012 May;98(9):691-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301247. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
8
Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices.用于管理数据的合并症评分得益于对本地编码和诊断实践的适应。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
9
Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care.比较 Charlson 合并症指数与 SAPS 和 APACHE 评分对 ICU 后死亡率的预测
Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:203-11. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S20247. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
10
The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients.基于人群的丹麦国家患者登记处使用 ICD-10 诊断编码评估 Charlson 合并症指数疾病的预测价值。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 28;11:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-83.