Suppr超能文献

电子烟与尼古丁戒除:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

E-cigarettes and nicotine abstinence: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Institute of Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Kiel, Germany

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Dept of Psychology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Mar 23;31(163). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0215-2021. Print 2022 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as a therapeutic intervention compared to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) on nicotine abstinence.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched the PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles published up to and including 10 July 2021. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which nicotine e-cigarettes were compared to NRT among current cigarette users. The primary outcome was abstaining from all nicotine-delivery devices. Secondary outcomes were 1) allocated product use (e-cigarettes or NRT) among successful cigarette quitters and 2) quitting cigarettes at the end of the trial using fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel models.

RESULTS

We included four RCTs representing 1598 adult participants (51.0% females). The mean age of participants in these studies ranged from 41 to 54 years, while average baseline smoking ranged from 14 to 21 cigarettes per day. Compared to NRT, e-cigarette use was associated with lower nicotine abstinence rates at the longest follow-up (risk ratio 0.50 (95% CI 0.32-0.77)). Among successful cigarette quitters, the risk of allocated product use by the end of the observational time was higher for e-cigarette users compared to NRT (risk ratio 8.94 (95% CI 3.98-20.07)). E-cigarette users had higher cigarette smoking cessation rates compared to NRT users (risk ratio 1.58 (95% CI 1.20-2.08)).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of e-cigarettes as a therapeutic intervention for smoking cessation may lead to permanent nicotine dependence.

摘要

目的

评估电子烟(e-cigarettes)作为一种治疗干预手段与尼古丁替代疗法(nicotine replacement therapy,NRT)相比,在帮助戒烟方面的效果。

方法

两位作者独立检索了PubMed、Embase、PsycInfo 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库中截至 2021 年 7 月 10 日发表的文章。我们纳入了比较当前吸烟者使用尼古丁电子烟与 NRT 的随机对照试验(randomised controlled trials,RCTs)。主要结局是完全戒除所有含尼古丁的装置。次要结局是 1)成功戒烟者分配使用的产品(电子烟或 NRT),2)使用固定效应 Mantel-Haenszel 模型在试验结束时戒烟。

结果

我们纳入了四项 RCT,代表了 1598 名成年参与者(51.0%为女性)。这些研究中参与者的平均年龄在 41 至 54 岁之间,而平均基线吸烟量在每天 14 至 21 支之间。与 NRT 相比,电子烟使用在最长随访时间与尼古丁戒断率较低相关(风险比 0.50(95%CI 0.32-0.77))。在成功戒烟者中,与 NRT 相比,电子烟使用者在观察时间结束时使用分配产品的风险更高(风险比 8.94(95%CI 3.98-20.07))。与 NRT 使用者相比,电子烟使用者的戒烟率更高(风险比 1.58(95%CI 1.20-2.08))。

结论

将电子烟作为一种治疗干预手段用于戒烟可能会导致永久性尼古丁依赖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37da/9488503/f6cf21f3ac12/ERR-0215-2021.01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验