ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2035504. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2035504.
The EDCTP-TDR Clinical Research and Development Fellowship (CRDF) scheme has offered one-year clinical research training placements for early- and mid-career researchers from LMIC since 1999.
Using the results of a 2018 external evaluation of the CRDF, the current article aims to identify the principal benefits for the main stakeholders of the CRDF scheme as well as the main barriers to accessing these benefits.
Data analysis was derived from an external evaluation of the CRDF scheme. Based on a logical framework approach, data for the external evaluation was collected through document review, interviews, focus groups, and questionnaires collected from the main stakeholder groups. The evaluation was structured along six main themes: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability, and equity.
The current paper focuses on the expected benefits, unexpected benefits, and barriers to enjoying benefits of the scheme for key stakeholders.
Expected benefits were aligned with the development of clinical research competencies, which is the objective of the scheme. Unexpected benefits centred on transferable professional skills in scientific leadership and knowledge translation. Barriers mainly were found around engagement with home institutions and the return and reintegration of fellows following the training period.
Recommendations include further engagement with and support for home institutions and developing a formal framework for the development of transferable professional competencies, including leadership and knowledge transfer competencies.
自 1999 年以来,EDCTP-TDR 临床研究与开发奖学金(CRDF)计划为来自 LMIC 的早期和中期职业研究人员提供为期一年的临床研究培训。
本文利用 2018 年对 CRDF 的外部评估结果,旨在确定 CRDF 计划主要利益相关者的主要利益,以及获得这些利益的主要障碍。
数据分析源自对 CRDF 计划的外部评估。基于逻辑框架方法,通过文件审查、访谈、焦点小组和主要利益相关者群体的问卷收集了外部评估的数据。评估按照六个主要主题进行组织:相关性、有效性、效率、影响、可持续性和公平性。
本文重点介绍了该计划主要利益相关者对预期收益、意外收益和享受收益的障碍的看法。
预期收益与临床研究能力的发展一致,这是该计划的目标。意外收益集中在科学领导力和知识转化方面的可转移专业技能上。障碍主要是在与本国机构的参与以及培训期结束后研究员的回归和再融入方面。
建议包括进一步与本国机构接触和支持,并制定一个正式框架,发展可转移的专业能力,包括领导力和知识转移能力。