• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service.临床服务中专后护理学生学术研究的障碍和促进因素。
Curationis. 2023 Jun 22;46(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385.
2
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
3
Faculty Support for a Culture of Scholarship of Discovery: A Literature Review.支持发现学术文化的教师:文献综述。
J Prof Nurs. 2019 Nov-Dec;35(6):480-490. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 24.
4
Scholarship and mentoring: an essential partnership?奖学金与指导:一种重要的伙伴关系?
Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):573-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2010.01883.x.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Mentoring students in doctoral nursing programs: A scoping review.博士护理项目学生指导:范围综述。
J Prof Nurs. 2023 Mar-Apr;45:71-88. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Scholarly Requirements and Support for Nursing Faculty Development and Career Advancement: A Nationwide Delphi Study.学术要求与支持对护理教师发展和职业晋升的影响:一项全国范围的德尔菲研究。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021;42(2):69-73. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000784.
8
Exploring mentorship practices in clinical education in nursing homes: A qualitative mixed-methods study.探索养老院临床教育中的指导实践:一项定性混合方法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Apr;31(7-8):895-908. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15943. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
9
Clinical mentors' experiences of their intercultural communication competence in mentoring culturally and linguistically diverse nursing students: A qualitative study.临床导师在指导文化和语言多样化护理学生方面的跨文化交际能力的体验:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104348. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104348. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Exploring alternative forms of scholarship for nurse educators' success.探索有助于护士教育工作者取得成功的其他学术形式。
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Nov-Dec;43:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming the experience in nursing and midwifery research - Quarantine Research Time Program (QRTP).变革护理与助产研究体验——隔离研究时间计划(QRTP)。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 28;24(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03584-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits and barriers in a clinical research competency development scheme for low- and middle-income countries.发展中国家临床研究能力培养计划的益处和障碍。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2035504. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2035504.
2
Programmatic details and outcomes of an Academic-Practice Research Fellowship for clinical nurses.临床护士学术实践研究奖学金的方案细节和成果。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151296. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151296. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
The growth of nursing research within a large healthcare system.大型医疗保健系统中护理研究的发展。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151291. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151291. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
The value of "why": Advancing clinical nurse led research.“为何”的价值:推进临床护士主导的研究
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151289. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151289. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
Embracing Implementation Science: A Paradigm Shift for Nursing Research.拥抱实施科学:护理研究的范式转变。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 Jan;52(1):3-5. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12507. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.内容分析实践指南。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
7
National Study of Nursing Research Characteristics at Magnet®-Designated Hospitals.针对获得磁体认证医院的护理研究特征的全国性研究。
J Nurs Adm. 2018 May;48(5):247-258. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000609.
8
Clarifying the Conundrum: Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, or Research?: The Clinical Scholarship Continuum.澄清难题:循证实践、质量改进还是研究?:临床学术连续体
J Nurs Adm. 2017 May;47(5):266-270. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000477.
9
Research-active clinical nurses: against all odds.积极从事研究的临床护士:克服重重困难。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Mar;26(5-6):766-773. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13523. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
10
Cultivating Medical Education Research Mentorship as a Pathway Towards High Quality Medical Education Research.培养医学教育研究指导,作为通往高质量医学教育研究的途径。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Sep;30(9):1359-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3295-5.

临床服务中专后护理学生学术研究的障碍和促进因素。

Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.

出版信息

Curationis. 2023 Jun 22;46(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385.

DOI:10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385
PMID:37403666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical scholarship is defined as an approach that enables evidence-based nursing and the development of best practices to meet the needs of clients efficiently and effectively. However, there are many barriers that impede its progress.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service areas.

METHOD

This multimethods study used a structured questionnaire followed by semi-structured individual interviews of post basic nursing students and their lecturers (nurse educators).

RESULTS

The 81 students who completed the questionnaire indicated a lack of support or funding assistance and mentoring, as well as no mechanisms to reward or recognise scholarship as top barriers to clinical scholarship. Top enablers were noticed as reward mechanisms in place, more protected time and availability of role models and mentoring. Twelve respondents engaged in the qualitative phase and three categories emerged from the data, namely (1) resource dependent, (2) 'what's the use of research', (3) making a change.

CONCLUSION

It has been shown that there is a need to adopt and promote a culture of clinical scholarship to ensure that the best available evidence is being utilised by nurses to effectively manage their patients; however, to support clinical scholarship, resources are needed.Contribution: This study highlighted the lack of funding and resources as being a major barrier to scholarship, together with an institutional culture that did not promote clinical scholarship. Providing protected time, mentoring and criteria for promotion and reward based on scholarship is viewed as enabling.

摘要

背景

临床学术被定义为一种方法,使循证护理和最佳实践的发展能够有效地满足客户的需求。然而,有许多障碍阻碍了它的发展。

目的

本研究旨在确定在临床服务领域的基础后护理学生的学术障碍和促进因素。

方法

本多方法研究使用了结构问卷调查,随后对基础后护理学生及其讲师(护理教育者)进行了半结构化的个人访谈。

结果

完成问卷的 81 名学生表示缺乏支持或资金援助和指导,以及没有奖励或认可奖学金的机制,这是临床学术的最大障碍。最大的促进因素是已经存在的奖励机制,更多的受保护时间,以及榜样和指导的可用性。12 名受访者参与了定性阶段,数据中出现了三个类别,分别是(1)资源依赖,(2)“研究有什么用”,(3)做出改变。

结论

研究表明,需要采取和推广临床学术文化,以确保护士利用最佳现有证据有效地管理他们的患者;然而,要支持临床学术,需要资源。

贡献

本研究强调了缺乏资金和资源是奖学金的主要障碍,以及一种不促进临床学术的机构文化。提供受保护的时间、指导以及基于奖学金的晋升和奖励标准被认为是具有促进作用的。