Suppr超能文献

临床服务中专后护理学生学术研究的障碍和促进因素。

Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.

出版信息

Curationis. 2023 Jun 22;46(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical scholarship is defined as an approach that enables evidence-based nursing and the development of best practices to meet the needs of clients efficiently and effectively. However, there are many barriers that impede its progress.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service areas.

METHOD

This multimethods study used a structured questionnaire followed by semi-structured individual interviews of post basic nursing students and their lecturers (nurse educators).

RESULTS

The 81 students who completed the questionnaire indicated a lack of support or funding assistance and mentoring, as well as no mechanisms to reward or recognise scholarship as top barriers to clinical scholarship. Top enablers were noticed as reward mechanisms in place, more protected time and availability of role models and mentoring. Twelve respondents engaged in the qualitative phase and three categories emerged from the data, namely (1) resource dependent, (2) 'what's the use of research', (3) making a change.

CONCLUSION

It has been shown that there is a need to adopt and promote a culture of clinical scholarship to ensure that the best available evidence is being utilised by nurses to effectively manage their patients; however, to support clinical scholarship, resources are needed.Contribution: This study highlighted the lack of funding and resources as being a major barrier to scholarship, together with an institutional culture that did not promote clinical scholarship. Providing protected time, mentoring and criteria for promotion and reward based on scholarship is viewed as enabling.

摘要

背景

临床学术被定义为一种方法,使循证护理和最佳实践的发展能够有效地满足客户的需求。然而,有许多障碍阻碍了它的发展。

目的

本研究旨在确定在临床服务领域的基础后护理学生的学术障碍和促进因素。

方法

本多方法研究使用了结构问卷调查,随后对基础后护理学生及其讲师(护理教育者)进行了半结构化的个人访谈。

结果

完成问卷的 81 名学生表示缺乏支持或资金援助和指导,以及没有奖励或认可奖学金的机制,这是临床学术的最大障碍。最大的促进因素是已经存在的奖励机制,更多的受保护时间,以及榜样和指导的可用性。12 名受访者参与了定性阶段,数据中出现了三个类别,分别是(1)资源依赖,(2)“研究有什么用”,(3)做出改变。

结论

研究表明,需要采取和推广临床学术文化,以确保护士利用最佳现有证据有效地管理他们的患者;然而,要支持临床学术,需要资源。

贡献

本研究强调了缺乏资金和资源是奖学金的主要障碍,以及一种不促进临床学术的机构文化。提供受保护的时间、指导以及基于奖学金的晋升和奖励标准被认为是具有促进作用的。

相似文献

2
3
Faculty Support for a Culture of Scholarship of Discovery: A Literature Review.支持发现学术文化的教师:文献综述。
J Prof Nurs. 2019 Nov-Dec;35(6):480-490. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 24.
4
Scholarship and mentoring: an essential partnership?奖学金与指导:一种重要的伙伴关系?
Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):573-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2010.01883.x.
6
Mentoring students in doctoral nursing programs: A scoping review.博士护理项目学生指导:范围综述。
J Prof Nurs. 2023 Mar-Apr;45:71-88. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

3
The growth of nursing research within a large healthcare system.大型医疗保健系统中护理研究的发展。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151291. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151291. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
The value of "why": Advancing clinical nurse led research.“为何”的价值:推进临床护士主导的研究
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151289. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151289. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.内容分析实践指南。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
9
Research-active clinical nurses: against all odds.积极从事研究的临床护士:克服重重困难。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Mar;26(5-6):766-773. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13523. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验