Suppr超能文献

设计思维在高等教育中的教与学:四所大学的经验。

Design thinking teaching and learning in higher education: Experiences across four universities.

机构信息

Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Center for Innovative Pharmacy Education and Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.

Department of Health Behavior, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265902. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

A growing body of literature highlights the increasing demand on college graduates to possess the problem finding, problem framing, and problem-solving skills necessary to address complex real-world challenges. Design thinking (DT) is an iterative, human-centered approach to problem solving that synthesizes what is desirable, equitable, technologically feasible, and sustainable. As universities expand efforts to train students with DT mindsets and skills, we must assess faculty and student DT practices and outcomes to better understand DT course experiences. Understanding how DT is taught and experienced within higher education can help schools promote student learning and align their training programs with professional, personal, and civic needs. In this study, surveys were completed by 19 faculty and 196 students from 23 courses at four universities. DT teaching and learning was characterized by three DT practices and five outcomes. Statistically significant differences were found by discipline of study and student type (i.e., graduate vs undergraduate), but not by gender or race/ethnicity. These results can be used to inform the development of classroom-based DT teaching and learning strategies across higher education institutions and disciplines.

摘要

越来越多的文献强调,大学毕业生需要具备发现问题、构建问题框架和解决问题的能力,以应对复杂的现实世界挑战。设计思维(DT)是一种迭代的、以人为中心的问题解决方法,它综合了理想、公平、技术可行性和可持续性。随着大学加大力度培养具有 DT 思维和技能的学生,我们必须评估教师和学生的 DT 实践和成果,以更好地了解 DT 课程体验。了解 DT 在高等教育中的教学和体验方式,可以帮助学校促进学生学习,并使他们的培训计划与专业、个人和公民需求保持一致。在这项研究中,来自四所大学的 23 门课程的 19 名教师和 196 名学生完成了调查。DT 的教学和学习特点是三种 DT 实践和五种成果。研究发现,学科和学生类型(即研究生与本科生)存在显著差异,但性别和种族/族裔不存在差异。这些结果可用于为跨高等教育机构和学科的课堂 DT 教学和学习策略的发展提供信息。

相似文献

1
Design thinking teaching and learning in higher education: Experiences across four universities.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265902. eCollection 2022.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
8
Application of the Flipped Classroom Mode under Few-Shot Learning in the Teaching of Health Physical Education in Colleges and Universities.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 11;2022:1465613. doi: 10.1155/2022/1465613. eCollection 2022.
9
Evidence-informed strategies for undergraduate nutrition education: a review.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Jul;40(7):652-61. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0368. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
10
Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing.
J STEM Educ Res. 2020;3(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
Enhancing Community-Based Participatory Research Through Human-Centered Design Strategies.
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):37-48. doi: 10.1177/1524839919850557. Epub 2019 May 25.
3
A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8.
4
Doctors as Makers.
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):40-44. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001312.
5
Design Thinking as a Tool for Interdisciplinary Education in Health Care.
Acad Med. 2016 Sep;91(9):1234-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001195.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验