Chen Elizabeth, Leos Cristina, Kowitt Sarah D, Moracco Kathryn E
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):37-48. doi: 10.1177/1524839919850557. Epub 2019 May 25.
. The purpose of this review is to compare and contrast the values, purpose, processes, and outcomes of human-centered design (HCD) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to address public health issues and to provide recommendations for how HCD can be incorporated into CBPR partnerships and projects. By consulting published literature, source materials, and experts on both approaches, a team of researchers completed a three-phased process of synthesizing key similarities and differences between HCD and CBPR and generating recommendations for ways to integrate HCD strategies in CBPR projects. There are five HCD strategies that can be readily incorporated into CBPR projects to improve outcomes: (1) form transdisciplinary teams, (2) center empathy, (3) recruit and work with "extreme users," (4) rapidly prototype, and (5) create tangible products or services. Integrating HCD in CBPR projects may lead to solutions that potentially have greater reach, are more readily adopted, are more effective, and add innovation to public health services, products, and policies.
本综述的目的是比较和对比以人为主导的设计（HCD）和基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）方法在解决公共卫生问题方面的价值观、目的、过程和结果，并就如何将HCD纳入CBPR伙伴关系和项目提供建议。通过查阅关于这两种方法的已发表文献、原始资料和专家意见，一组研究人员完成了一个三阶段的过程，综合了HCD和CBPR之间的关键异同点，并就将HCD策略整合到CBPR项目中的方法提出建议。有五种HCD策略可以很容易地纳入CBPR项目以改善结果：（1）组建跨学科团队，（2）以同理心为核心，（3）招募并与“极端用户”合作，（4）快速制作原型，以及（5）创造切实可行的产品或服务。将HCD整合到CBPR项目中可能会带来一些解决方案，这些解决方案可能具有更大的覆盖面、更容易被采用、更有效，并为公共卫生服务、产品和政策增添创新性。
