Stanzione Arnaldo, Galatola Roberta, Cuocolo Renato, Romeo Valeria, Verde Francesco, Mainenti Pier Paolo, Brunetti Arturo, Maurea Simone
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;12(3):578. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030578.
In this study, we aimed to systematically review the current literature on radiomics applied to cross-sectional adrenal imaging and assess its methodological quality. Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify original research articles investigating radiomics applications on cross-sectional adrenal imaging (search end date February 2021). For qualitative synthesis, details regarding study design, aim, sample size and imaging modality were recorded as well as those regarding the radiomics pipeline (e.g., segmentation and feature extraction strategy). The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS). After duplicate removal and selection criteria application, 25 full-text articles were included and evaluated. All were retrospective studies, mostly based on CT images (17/25, 68%), with manual (19/25, 76%) and two-dimensional segmentation (13/25, 52%) being preferred. Machine learning was paired to radiomics in about half of the studies (12/25, 48%). The median total and percentage RQS scores were 2 (interquartile range, IQR = -5-8) and 6% (IQR = 0-22%), respectively. The highest and lowest scores registered were 12/36 (33%) and -5/36 (0%). The most critical issues were the absence of proper feature selection, the lack of appropriate model validation and poor data openness. The methodological quality of radiomics studies on adrenal cross-sectional imaging is heterogeneous and lower than desirable. Efforts toward building higher quality evidence are essential to facilitate the future translation into clinical practice.
在本研究中,我们旨在系统回顾目前关于应用于肾上腺横断面成像的放射组学的文献,并评估其方法学质量。检索了Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science,以识别研究放射组学在肾上腺横断面成像中应用的原始研究文章(检索截止日期为2021年2月)。对于定性综合分析,记录了有关研究设计、目的、样本量和成像方式的详细信息,以及有关放射组学流程(例如分割和特征提取策略)的详细信息。使用放射组学质量评分(RQS)评估每项研究的方法学质量。在去除重复项并应用选择标准后,纳入并评估了25篇全文文章。所有研究均为回顾性研究,大多基于CT图像(17/25,68%),首选手动分割(19/25,76%)和二维分割(13/25,52%)。约一半的研究(12/25,48%)将机器学习与放射组学相结合。RQS总分中位数和百分比中位数分别为2(四分位间距,IQR = -5 - 8)和6%(IQR = 0 - 22%)。记录的最高和最低分数分别为12/36(33%)和 -5/36(0%)。最关键的问题是缺乏适当的特征选择、缺乏适当的模型验证以及数据开放性差。关于肾上腺横断面成像的放射组学研究的方法学质量参差不齐,低于预期。努力构建更高质量的证据对于促进未来转化为临床实践至关重要。