Zaizen Yoshiaki, Kanahori Yuki, Ishijima Sousuke, Kitamura Yuka, Yoon Han-Seung, Ozasa Mutsumi, Mukae Hiroshi, Bychkov Andrey, Hoshino Tomoaki, Fukuoka Junya
Department of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.
Division of Respirology, Neurology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 14;12(3):709. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030709.
The histopathological diagnosis of mycobacterial infection may be improved by a comprehensive analysis using artificial intelligence. Two autopsy cases of pulmonary tuberculosis, and forty biopsy cases of undetected acid-fast bacilli (AFB) were used to train AI (convolutional neural network), and construct an AI to support AFB detection. Forty-two patients underwent bronchoscopy, and were evaluated using AI-supported pathology to detect AFB. The AI-supported pathology diagnosis was compared with bacteriology diagnosis from bronchial lavage fluid and the final definitive diagnosis of mycobacteriosis. Among the 16 patients with mycobacteriosis, bacteriology was positive in 9 patients (56%). Two patients (13%) were positive for AFB without AI assistance, whereas AI-supported pathology identified eleven positive patients (69%). When limited to tuberculosis, AI-supported pathology had significantly higher sensitivity compared with bacteriology (86% vs. 29%, = 0.046). Seven patients diagnosed with mycobacteriosis had no consolidation or cavitary shadows in computed tomography; the sensitivity of bacteriology and AI-supported pathology was 29% and 86%, respectively ( = 0.046). The specificity of AI-supported pathology was 100% in this study. AI-supported pathology may be more sensitive than bacteriological tests for detecting AFB in samples collected via bronchoscopy.
使用人工智能进行综合分析可能会改善分枝杆菌感染的组织病理学诊断。利用两例肺结核尸检病例和40例未检测到抗酸杆菌(AFB)的活检病例来训练人工智能(卷积神经网络),并构建一个支持AFB检测的人工智能。42例患者接受了支气管镜检查,并使用人工智能辅助病理学来检测AFB。将人工智能辅助病理学诊断与支气管灌洗液体的细菌学诊断以及分枝杆菌病的最终确诊诊断进行比较。在16例分枝杆菌病患者中,9例(56%)细菌学检查呈阳性。2例患者(13%)在没有人工智能辅助情况下AFB呈阳性,而人工智能辅助病理学识别出11例阳性患者(69%)。当仅限于肺结核时,人工智能辅助病理学的敏感性显著高于细菌学(86%对29%,P = 0.046)。7例被诊断为分枝杆菌病的患者在计算机断层扫描中没有实变或空洞阴影;细菌学和人工智能辅助病理学的敏感性分别为29%和86%(P = 0.046)。在本研究中,人工智能辅助病理学的特异性为100%。对于通过支气管镜收集的样本检测AFB,人工智能辅助病理学可能比细菌学检测更敏感。