Suppr超能文献

神经电生理学是否是糖尿病周围神经病变治疗临床试验中一个可靠的主要终点指标?

Is Nerve Electrophysiology a Robust Primary Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Treatments for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy?

作者信息

Al-Bazz Dalal Y, Nelson Andrew J, Burgess Jamie, Petropoulos Ioannis N, Nizza Jael, Marshall Anne, Brown Emily, Cuthbertson Daniel J, Marshall Andrew G, Malik Rayaz A, Alam Uazman

机构信息

Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences and the Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool and Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK.

Research Division, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Qatar Foundation, Education City, Doha 24144, Qatar.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;12(3):731. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030731.

Abstract

There is currently no FDA-approved disease-modifying therapy for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) is an established primary endpoint of disease-modifying therapies in DPN and clinical trials have been powered with an assumed decline of 0.5 m/s/year. This paper sought to establish the time-dependent change in NCV associated with a placebo, compared to that observed in the active intervention group. A literature search identified twenty-one double-blind, randomised controlled trials in DPN of ≥1 year duration conducted between 1971 and 2021. We evaluated changes in neurophysiology, with a focus on peroneal motor and sural sensory NCV and amplitude in the placebo and treatment groups. There was significant variability in the change and direction of change (reduction/increase) in NCV in the placebo arm, as well as variability influenced by the anatomical site of neurophysiological measurement within a given clinical trial. A critical re-evaluation of efficacy trials should consider placebo-adjusted effects and present the placebo-subtracted change in NCV rather than assume a universal annual decline of 0.5 m/s/year. Importantly, endpoints such as corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) have demonstrated early nerve repair, whilst symptoms and NCV have not changed, and should thus be considered as a viable alternative.

摘要

目前尚无美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的用于治疗糖尿病性周围神经病变(DPN)的疾病改善疗法。神经传导速度(NCV)是DPN疾病改善疗法既定的主要终点,并且在临床试验中,假定其每年下降0.5米/秒来计算样本量。本文旨在确定与安慰剂相比,NCV随时间的变化情况,并与在积极干预组中观察到的情况进行比较。文献检索确定了1971年至2021年间进行的21项针对DPN的双盲、随机对照试验,试验持续时间≥1年。我们评估了神经生理学的变化,重点关注安慰剂组和治疗组中腓总神经运动和腓肠神经感觉的NCV及波幅。在安慰剂组中,NCV的变化及其变化方向(降低/增加)存在显著差异,并且在给定的临床试验中,这种差异还受到神经生理学测量解剖部位的影响。对疗效试验进行严格的重新评估时,应考虑安慰剂调整后的效应,并呈现减去安慰剂后的NCV变化,而不是假定其每年普遍下降0.5米/秒。重要的是,诸如角膜共聚焦显微镜检查(CCM)等终点已显示出早期神经修复,而症状和NCV并未改变,因此应将其视为一种可行的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fde2/8947384/45b12bc305b5/diagnostics-12-00731-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验