Lee Ying-Han, Ouyang Chen-Sen, Chiu Yi-Hung, Chiang Ching-Tai, Wu Rong-Ching, Yang Rei-Cheng, Lin Lung-Chang
Department of Post Baccalaureate Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.
Department of Information Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 840, Taiwan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063163.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 5−7% of school-age children. ADHD is usually marked by an ongoing pattern of inattention or hyperactivity−impulsivity, leading to functioning or developmental problems. A common ADHD assessment tool is the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham (SNAP) questionnaire. However, such scales provide only a subjective perspective, and most of them are used to evaluate therapeutic effects at least 3−12 months after medication initiation. Therefore, we employed an objective assessment method to provide more accurate evaluations of therapeutic effects in 25 children with ADHD (23 boys and 2 girls). To evaluate the participants’ improvement and treatment’s effectiveness, the pixel subtraction technique was used in video analysis. We compared the efficacy of 1-month Ritalin or Concerta treatment by evaluating the movement in each video within 3 h of medication administration. The movement value was defined as the result of a calculation when using the pixel subtraction technique. Based on behavior observation and SNAP scores, both parent- and teacher-reported scores decreased after 1 month of medication (reduction rates: 19.61% and 16.38%, respectively). Specifically, the parent-reported hyperactivity subscale and teacher-reported oppositional subscale decreased more significantly. By contrast, the reduction rate was 39.27%, as evaluated using the average movement value (AMV). Considering symptomatic improvement as a >25% reduction in scores, the result revealed that the AMV decreased in 18 patients (72%) compared with only 44% and 56% of patients based on parent- and teacher-reported hyperactivity subscale scores. In conclusion, the pixel subtraction method can serve as an objective and reliable evaluation of the therapeutic effects of ADHD medication in the early stage.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)影响着约5%-7%的学龄儿童。ADHD通常表现为持续的注意力不集中或多动-冲动行为模式,导致功能或发育问题。一种常见的ADHD评估工具是斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆(SNAP)问卷。然而,此类量表仅提供主观视角,且大多数用于评估药物治疗开始后至少3-12个月的治疗效果。因此,我们采用一种客观评估方法,对25名ADHD儿童(23名男孩和2名女孩)的治疗效果进行更准确评估。为评估参与者的改善情况和治疗效果,在视频分析中使用了像素减法技术。我们通过评估给药后3小时内每个视频中的运动情况,比较了1个月利他林或康纳达治疗的疗效。运动值定义为使用像素减法技术进行计算的结果。基于行为观察和SNAP评分,服药1个月后家长和教师报告的评分均下降(下降率分别为19.61%和16.38%)。具体而言,家长报告的多动子量表和教师报告的对立子量表下降更为显著。相比之下,使用平均运动值(AMV)评估的下降率为39.27%。将症状改善定义为评分降低>25%,结果显示,与基于家长和教师报告的多动子量表评分的患者分别为44%和56%相比,18名患者(72%)的AMV下降。总之,像素减法方法可作为ADHD药物治疗早期疗效的客观可靠评估方法。