Department of Industrial Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063230.
With social networking enabling the expressions of billions of people to be posted online, sentiment analysis and massive computational power enables systematic mining of information about populations including their affective states with respect to epidemiological concerns during a pandemic. Gleaning rationale for behavioral choices, such as vaccine hesitancy, from public commentary expressed through social media channels may provide quantifiable and articulated sources of feedback that are useful for rapidly modifying or refining pandemic spread predictions, health protocols, vaccination offerings, and policy approaches. Additional potential gains of sentiment analysis may include lessening of vaccine hesitancy, reduction in civil disobedience, and most importantly, better healthcare outcomes for individuals and their communities. In this article, we highlight the evolution of select epidemiological models; conduct a critical review of models in terms of the level and depth of modeling of social media, social network factors, and sentiment analysis; and finally, partially illustrate sentiment analysis using COVID-19 Twitter data.
随着社交网络使得数十亿人的表达能够被发布到网上,情感分析和大规模计算能力使得能够系统地挖掘有关人群的信息,包括在大流行期间他们对流行病学问题的情感状态。从社交媒体渠道表达的公众意见中获取疫苗犹豫等行为选择的基本原理,可能提供可量化和明确的反馈来源,这对于快速修改或完善大流行传播预测、卫生协议、疫苗接种提供和政策方法非常有用。情感分析的其他潜在收益可能包括减少疫苗犹豫、减少公民抗命,最重要的是,为个人及其社区提供更好的医疗保健结果。在本文中,我们强调了一些选择的流行病学模型的演变;根据社交媒体、社交网络因素和情感分析的建模水平和深度,对模型进行了批判性评价;最后,使用 COVID-19 Twitter 数据部分说明了情感分析。