• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究父母教养方式对社交技能的影响:情感的中介作用。

Exploring the Effect of Parental Styles on Social Skills: The Mediating Role of Affects.

作者信息

Salavera Carlos, Usán Pablo, Quilez-Robres Alberto

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of Education, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3295. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063295.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19063295
PMID:35328983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8953939/
Abstract

Parental educational styles have a significant effect in personal development. These styles (authoritative, democratic, permissive and neglectful) can be related to affects and social skills at the individual level. The study presented here, which comprised 456 participants (151 men; 33.11%), with an average age of 22.01 years ( = 2.80), aimed to analyse the relationship between parental styles, affects and social skills, as well as the role played by affects in the relationship between parental style and social skills. The results suggest that the constructs under study are closely related. The most common parental style is democratic. By gender, permissive styles were more often applied to women and authoritative styles to men. No significant gender differences were found in the application of democratic and neglectful parental styles. In terms of emotional support, women were found to have higher negative affect scores and men higher emotional support scores. People with parents that use democratic and permissive styles scored higher in all variables related to affects and social skills, which challenges the notion that democratic styles are the best parental styles in terms of socialisation of children. The results of the affect and social skills scales were analysed in relation to parenting styles, indicating that children educated under a democratic parental regime tend to yield higher scores in terms of social skills than children educated under any other form of parental regime and medium scores in terms of affects. Finally, it was found that parenting styles have a direct influence on social skills, which tend to improve when affects play a mediating role between these two constructs. These results suggest that parenting styles are closely related to affects and social skills. In addition, they also suggest that affects play a mediating role in the relationship between parenting styles and social skills. Finally, owing to the impact that parenting styles have on affects and social skills, more research is needed to address this issue.

摘要

父母的教育方式对个人发展有着重大影响。这些方式(权威型、民主型、放任型和忽视型)在个体层面上可能与情感及社交技能相关。此处呈现的这项研究包含456名参与者(151名男性,占33.11%),平均年龄为22.01岁(标准差 = 2.80),旨在分析父母教育方式、情感与社交技能之间的关系,以及情感在父母教育方式与社交技能关系中所起的作用。结果表明,所研究的这些构念紧密相关。最常见的父母教育方式是民主型。按性别来看,放任型方式更多地应用于女性,权威型方式更多地应用于男性。在民主型和忽视型父母教育方式的应用上未发现显著的性别差异。在情感支持方面,发现女性的消极情感得分更高,而男性的情感支持得分更高。父母采用民主型和放任型教育方式的人在所有与情感和社交技能相关的变量上得分更高,这对民主型教育方式是儿童社会化方面最佳的父母教育方式这一观念提出了挑战。对情感和社交技能量表的结果与养育方式进行了分析,表明在民主型父母教育模式下接受教育的孩子在社交技能方面往往比在任何其他形式的父母教育模式下接受教育的孩子得分更高,在情感方面得分中等。最后,发现养育方式对社交技能有直接影响,当情感在这两个构念之间起中介作用时,社交技能往往会得到改善。这些结果表明,养育方式与情感和社交技能密切相关。此外,它们还表明情感在养育方式与社交技能的关系中起中介作用。最后,由于养育方式对情感和社交技能有影响,需要更多研究来解决这个问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc1f/8953939/e62831ede690/ijerph-19-03295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc1f/8953939/e62831ede690/ijerph-19-03295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc1f/8953939/e62831ede690/ijerph-19-03295-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Effect of Parental Styles on Social Skills: The Mediating Role of Affects.探究父母教养方式对社交技能的影响:情感的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3295. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063295.
2
Parental feeding practices predict authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles.父母的喂养方式预示着权威型、专制型和放任型的育儿方式。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jul;108(7):1154-61; discussion 1161-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.008.
3
A Third Emerging Stage for the Current Digital Society? Optimal Parenting Styles in Spain, the United States, Germany, and Brazil.当前数字社会的第三个新兴阶段?西班牙、美国、德国和巴西的最佳育儿方式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 2;16(13):2333. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132333.
4
Sensory sensitivity and its relationship with adult attachment and parenting styles.感觉敏感性及其与成人依恋和育儿风格的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0209555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209555. eCollection 2019.
5
Relationships between Parental Socialization Styles, Empathy and Connectedness with Nature: Their Implications in Environmentalism.亲子社会化风格、同理心与与自然的连接之间的关系:其对环境主义的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 11;16(14):2461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142461.
6
Cross-sectional associations between maternal parenting styles, physical activity and screen sedentary time in children.母亲育儿方式、儿童身体活动与屏幕久坐时间之间的横断面关联。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4784-8.
7
Are parental autism spectrum disorder and/or attention-deficit/Hyperactivity disorder symptoms related to parenting styles in families with ASD (+ADHD) affected children?自闭症谱系障碍和/或注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患儿的父母的相关症状是否与其家庭的教养方式有关?
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;22(11):671-81. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0408-8. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
8
Effects of different parenting styles on the physical health of Chinese university students.不同教养方式对中国大学生身体健康的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;12:1433538. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1433538. eCollection 2024.
9
The integrative role of parenting styles and parental involvement in young children's science problem-solving skills.教养方式和父母参与对幼儿科学问题解决能力的综合作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 12;14:1096846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096846. eCollection 2023.
10
Perceived parenting styles and primary attachment styles of single and children living with both parents.单身父母和与双亲同住的儿童感知的养育方式和主要依恋方式。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jun;71(6):1540-1544. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.626.

引用本文的文献

1
[Impact of gender violence on girls and adolescents].[性别暴力对女童和青少年的影响]
Aten Primaria. 2024 Nov;56(11):102972. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102972. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
The impact of parenting styles on undergraduate students' emotion regulation: The mediating role of academic-social student-faculty interaction.教养方式对本科生情绪调节的影响:学术性社会师生互动的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 7;13:972006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972006. eCollection 2022.
3
Relationship between family-related factors and functional constipation among Chinese preschoolers: a case-control study.

本文引用的文献

1
We Know Even More Things: A Decade Review of Parenting Research.我们知道的更多了:育儿研究十年回顾。
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Dec;31(4):870-888. doi: 10.1111/jora.12641.
2
Reciprocal Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Interpersonal Personality in Chinese Adolescents.中国青少年养育方式与人际人格的相互关系
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 7;12:740026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740026. eCollection 2021.
3
Relationship between Social Skills and Happiness: Differences by Gender.社会技能与幸福感的关系:性别差异。
中国学龄前儿童功能性便秘与家庭相关因素的关系:病例对照研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03521-w.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 27;18(15):7929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157929.
4
A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity.一种现代网络方法重新探讨正性负性情感量表(PANAS)的建构效度。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Oct;77(10):2370-2404. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23191. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Social Skills and Peer Harassment. A Study with High School Students.情绪智力、社交技能与同伴欺凌的关系。一项针对高中生的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124208.
6
Personal Risk and Protective Factors Involved in Aggressive Behavior.攻击性行为中涉及的个人风险和保护因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):NP1489-NP1515. doi: 10.1177/0886260520926322. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
Parents or Peers? Predictors of Prosocial Behavior and Aggression: A Longitudinal Study.父母还是同龄人?亲社会行为和攻击行为的预测因素:一项纵向研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 22;10:2379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02379. eCollection 2019.
8
Investigating the interplay between parenting dimensions and styles, and the association with adolescent outcomes.探讨父母教养维度和风格之间的相互作用,以及它们与青少年结果的关系。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;29(3):327-342. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01349-x. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
A Social Gradient in the Effects of the Skills for Life Program on Self-Efficacy and Mental Wellbeing of Adolescent Students.生活技能方案对青少年学生自我效能感和心理健康影响的社会梯度。
J Sch Health. 2019 Jul;89(7):587-595. doi: 10.1111/josh.12779. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
Parental Psychological Control and Emotional and Behavioral Disorders among Spanish Adolescents.父母心理控制与西班牙青少年的情绪和行为障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 12;16(3):507. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030507.