Suppr超能文献

EndoSeal MTA、iRoot SP和AH Plus对浮游细菌的抗菌活性评估。

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria.

作者信息

Mak Siew Thong, Leong Xin Fang, Tew In Meei, Kumolosasi Endang, Wong Lishen

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia.

Department of Craniofacial Diagnostics and Biosciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;15(6):2012. doi: 10.3390/ma15062012.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealers, AH Plus, iRoot SP, and EndoSeal MTA, against four planktonic bacteria species. The antibacterial activity of the three endodontic sealers was assessed using a modified direct contact test. Bacteria suspension of , , and were left in contact with the sealers that were pre-set or set for 1, 3, 7, and l4 days for an hour. Freshly mixed AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA were highly effective against all four tested bacteria as no surviving bacteria were recovered after treatment. Meanwhile, freshly mixed iRoot SP was not able to kill all bacteria, regardless of the species, demonstrating a weak antibacterial effect. After 24 h, AH Plus lost its antibacterial activity. EndoSeal MTA showed a strong and extended bactericidal effect against and for 3 days and for 7 days. In conclusion, fresh AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA exhibited a potent effect against all four bacteria species. EndoSeal MTA remained effective after setting when tested against , and . Among all tested sealers, iRoot SP demonstrates the weakest antibacterial activity.

摘要

本研究旨在调查三种根管封闭剂AH Plus、iRoot SP和EndoSeal MTA对四种浮游细菌的抗菌活性。采用改良的直接接触试验评估这三种根管封闭剂的抗菌活性。将金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌的细菌悬液与预先设定或设定1、3、7和14天的封闭剂接触1小时。新鲜混合的AH Plus和EndoSeal MTA对所有四种受试细菌都非常有效,因为处理后未检测到存活细菌。同时,无论细菌种类如何,新鲜混合的iRoot SP都不能杀死所有细菌,显示出较弱的抗菌效果。24小时后,AH Plus失去了抗菌活性。EndoSeal MTA对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌显示出强烈且持久的杀菌作用,持续3天,对粪肠球菌持续7天。总之,新鲜的AH Plus和EndoSeal MTA对所有四种细菌都有强效作用。EndoSeal MTA在凝固后对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和粪肠球菌进行测试时仍然有效。在所有测试的封闭剂中,iRoot SP的抗菌活性最弱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4372/8950277/c1c7358ea163/materials-15-02012-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers against Planktonic Bacteria and Bacteria in Biofilms.
J Endod. 2018 Jan;44(1):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
5
Antibacterial Activity of MTA Fillapex and AH 26 Root Canal Sealers at Different Time Intervals.
Iran Endod J. 2016 Summer;11(3):192-7. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 May 1.
6
The in vitro antimicrobial activities of four endodontic sealers.
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 18;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0817-2.
7
Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against .
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jun 1;9(6):e743-e748. doi: 10.4317/jced.53753. eCollection 2017 Jun.
10
Physicochemical Properties of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers.
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2017;2017:2582849. doi: 10.1155/2017/2582849. Epub 2017 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of ultrasonic-assisted iRoot SP single-cone technique on root canal filling efficacy: an in vitro study.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4375-4386. doi: 10.62347/WAIK7340. eCollection 2025.
2
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Endoseal MTA and AH Plus Sealers on and Mature Biofilms.
Front Dent. 2025 May 19;22:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i19.18760. eCollection 2025.
6
The effect of AH26, Endoseal and ZOE sealers on Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis.
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Oct 23;19:Doc50. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000505. eCollection 2024.
7
Evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic properties of TotalFill and NeoSEALER flo bioceramic sealers.
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 May;27(5):491-497. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_103_24. Epub 2024 May 10.
8
Sol-Gel Technologies to Obtain Advanced Bioceramics for Dental Therapeutics.
Molecules. 2023 Oct 7;28(19):6967. doi: 10.3390/molecules28196967.

本文引用的文献

1
Bactericidal Effect of a Novel Alkaline EDTA Root Canal Cleaning Solution.
Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul;15(3):546-550. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723067. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of silver nanoparticles against .
Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Jul 23;7(1):105-109. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1796674.
3
Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Streptococcus mutans Strains Isolated from Endodontic Infections.
J Endod. 2020 Dec;46(12):1876-1883. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Apical root canal cleaning after preparation with endodontic instruments: a randomized trial analysis.
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jun 24;45(3):e38. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e38. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Comprehensive review of current endodontic sealers.
Dent Mater J. 2020 Sep 29;39(5):703-720. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-288. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
8
[Antibacterial effectiveness of calcium silicate-based root canal sealer against biofilms in infected dentinal tubules ].
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 9;54(10):656-661. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2019.10.002.
9
The in vitro antimicrobial activities of four endodontic sealers.
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 18;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0817-2.
10
Bioactive tri/dicalcium silicate cements for treatment of pulpal and periapical tissues.
Acta Biomater. 2019 Sep 15;96:35-54. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.050. Epub 2019 May 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验