• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管治疗后使用AH plus、Endoseal MTA和冷陶瓷封闭剂时粪肠球菌在牙本质小管内存活情况的体外比较

In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.

作者信息

Mokhtari Fatemeh, Modaresi Jalil, Salmasi Ali Hasanzade, Khamisi Nima, Zandi Hengameh, Lesani Katayoun

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Blvd., Imam Reza Sq, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1488. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8
PMID:39696293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11658299/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most common microorganism responsible for post-endodontic infections, which can penetrate deep into dentinal tubules. This study aimed to compare the survival of E. faecalis in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH Plus (AHP), Endoseal MTA (ESM), and cold ceramic (CC) sealers.

METHODS

In this in vitro experimental study, 80 single-canal human teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction. The root canals were cleaned and shaped, and auto-clave sterilized after smear layer removal. The roots were then inoculated with E. faecalis, and incubated for 3 weeks. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 20) for root canal obturation with AHP, ESM, and CC sealers and 2% gutta-percha with the cold lateral compaction technique. The fourth group served as the control group. After 30 days, dentin chips were collected from the canals, and cultured on blood agar. The colony count was reported and analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean colony count was 23.73 ± 13.84 in the AHP, 34.78 ± 18.75 in the ESM, and 28.47 ± 13.73 in the CC group after 30 days. The difference in this regard was not significant among the three experimental groups (P = 0.102).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results indicated comparable antibacterial activity of AHP, ESM, and CC sealers against E. faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after 30 days.

摘要

背景

粪肠球菌是根管治疗后感染最常见的病原体,它可深入牙本质小管。本研究旨在比较粪肠球菌在使用AH Plus(AHP)、Endoseal MTA(ESM)和冷陶瓷(CC)封闭剂进行根管治疗后的牙本质小管中的存活率。

方法

在这项体外实验研究中,80颗单根管人牙在牙骨质牙釉质界处截冠。根管进行清理、预备,去除玷污层后高压灭菌。然后将牙根接种粪肠球菌,孵育3周。将牙齿随机分为四组(n = 20),分别用AHP、ESM和CC封闭剂以及2%牙胶尖采用冷侧方加压技术进行根管充填。第四组作为对照组。30天后,从根管中收集牙本质碎屑,接种于血琼脂培养基上培养。报告菌落计数,并采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

30天后,AHP组平均菌落计数为23.73±13.84,ESM组为34.78±18.75,CC组为28.47±13.73。三个实验组在这方面的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.102)。

结论

在本体外研究的局限性内,结果表明30天后AHP、ESM和CC封闭剂对感染牙本质小管中的粪肠球菌具有相当的抗菌活性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b48e/11658299/a7a612dcb61e/12903_2024_5192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b48e/11658299/a7a612dcb61e/12903_2024_5192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b48e/11658299/a7a612dcb61e/12903_2024_5192_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.根管治疗后使用AH plus、Endoseal MTA和冷陶瓷封闭剂时粪肠球菌在牙本质小管内存活情况的体外比较
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1488. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8.
2
Antibacterial activity of various root canal sealers and root-end filling materials in dentin blocks infected ex vivo with Enterococcus faecalis.粪肠球菌体外感染牙本质块中各种根管封闭剂和根尖充填材料的抗菌活性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Nov;72(8):970-6. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.931462. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
3
Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.牙本质可增强根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
4
Bacterial killing by several root filling materials and methods in an ex vivo infected root canal model.几种根管填充材料和方法在离体感染根管模型中的杀菌效果。
Int Endod J. 2011 Dec;44(12):1102-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01928.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
5
Antimicrobial influence of different root canal filling techniques in experimentally infected human root canals.不同根管充填技术对实验性感染的人根管的抗菌影响。
Quintessence Int. 2017;48(4):273-280. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a37129.
6
Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in experimental primary and secondary endodontic infections.光动力疗法(PDT)对实验性原发性和继发性牙髓感染中粪肠球菌生物膜的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Nov 4;14:132. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-132.
7
Penetrability of AH plus and MTA fillapex after endodontic treatment and retreatment: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.AH plus和MTA fillapex在根管治疗和再治疗后的渗透性:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
Microsc Res Tech. 2014 Jun;77(6):467-71. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22371. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
8
Investigation of the effect of sealer use on the heat generated at the external root surface during root canal obturation using warm vertical compaction technique with System B heat source.使用System B热源的热垂直加压技术进行根管充填时,研究封闭剂的使用对牙根外表面产生热量的影响。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.026. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
9
Dissolution, dislocation and dimensional changes of endodontic sealers after a solubility challenge: a micro-CT approach.溶解度挑战后根管封闭剂的溶解、脱位及尺寸变化:微计算机断层扫描法
Int Endod J. 2017 Apr;50(4):407-414. doi: 10.1111/iej.12636. Epub 2016 Apr 17.
10
Evaluation of fracture resistance in simulated immature teeth using Resilon and Ribbond as root reinforcements--an in vitro study.使用Resilon和Ribbond作为牙根增强材料对模拟未成熟牙齿的抗折性评估——一项体外研究。
Dent Traumatol. 2009 Aug;25(4):433-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00804.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Membrane Vesicles of : In Vitro Composition Analysis and Macrophage Inflammatory Response Under Different pH Conditions.[具体来源]的膜泡:不同pH条件下的体外成分分析及巨噬细胞炎症反应
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 10;13(6):1344. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061344.

本文引用的文献

1
The presence of in saliva as a risk factor for endodontic infection.唾液中 存在作为牙髓感染的危险因素。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Apr 6;13:1061645. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1061645. eCollection 2023.
2
Wake Up! Resuscitation of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria: Mechanism and Potential Application.苏醒!可存活但不可培养细菌的复苏:机制与潜在应用
Foods. 2022 Dec 23;12(1):82. doi: 10.3390/foods12010082.
3
Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria.
EndoSeal MTA、iRoot SP和AH Plus对浮游细菌的抗菌活性评估。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;15(6):2012. doi: 10.3390/ma15062012.
4
The Short-Term Antibacterial Activity of Three Selected Endodontic Sealers against Bacterial Culture.三种选定的根管封闭剂对细菌培养物的短期抗菌活性
Life (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;12(2):158. doi: 10.3390/life12020158.
5
Minimal Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Endodontic Sealers in Warm Vertical Compaction by Direct Detection via SEM Analysis.通过扫描电子显微镜分析直接检测热垂直加压时根管封闭剂的最小牙本质小管渗透情况
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 27;10(19):4440. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194440.
6
Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation.Endoseal MTA封闭剂与Pro-Root MTA在牙根穿孔中细菌微渗漏的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Jun;22(2):96-101. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.86042.1164.
7
How to Evaluate Non-Growing Cells-Current Strategies for Determining Antimicrobial Resistance of VBNC Bacteria.如何评估非生长细胞——检测活的非可培养细菌抗菌耐药性的当前策略
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 26;10(2):115. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020115.
8
The Influence of Enterococcus faecalis as a Dental Root Canal Pathogen on Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review.粪肠球菌作为牙根管病原体对根管治疗的影响:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2020 Mar 13;12(3):e7257. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7257.
9
Crucial role for central carbon metabolism in the bacterial L-form switch and killing by β-lactam antibiotics.中央碳代谢在细菌 L 型转换和β-内酰胺类抗生素杀菌中的关键作用。
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Oct;4(10):1716-1726. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0497-3. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
10
The in vitro antimicrobial activities of four endodontic sealers.四种根管封闭剂的体外抗菌活性。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 18;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0817-2.