Suppr超能文献

根管治疗后使用AH plus、Endoseal MTA和冷陶瓷封闭剂时粪肠球菌在牙本质小管内存活情况的体外比较

In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.

作者信息

Mokhtari Fatemeh, Modaresi Jalil, Salmasi Ali Hasanzade, Khamisi Nima, Zandi Hengameh, Lesani Katayoun

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Blvd., Imam Reza Sq, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1488. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most common microorganism responsible for post-endodontic infections, which can penetrate deep into dentinal tubules. This study aimed to compare the survival of E. faecalis in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH Plus (AHP), Endoseal MTA (ESM), and cold ceramic (CC) sealers.

METHODS

In this in vitro experimental study, 80 single-canal human teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction. The root canals were cleaned and shaped, and auto-clave sterilized after smear layer removal. The roots were then inoculated with E. faecalis, and incubated for 3 weeks. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 20) for root canal obturation with AHP, ESM, and CC sealers and 2% gutta-percha with the cold lateral compaction technique. The fourth group served as the control group. After 30 days, dentin chips were collected from the canals, and cultured on blood agar. The colony count was reported and analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean colony count was 23.73 ± 13.84 in the AHP, 34.78 ± 18.75 in the ESM, and 28.47 ± 13.73 in the CC group after 30 days. The difference in this regard was not significant among the three experimental groups (P = 0.102).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results indicated comparable antibacterial activity of AHP, ESM, and CC sealers against E. faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after 30 days.

摘要

背景

粪肠球菌是根管治疗后感染最常见的病原体,它可深入牙本质小管。本研究旨在比较粪肠球菌在使用AH Plus(AHP)、Endoseal MTA(ESM)和冷陶瓷(CC)封闭剂进行根管治疗后的牙本质小管中的存活率。

方法

在这项体外实验研究中,80颗单根管人牙在牙骨质牙釉质界处截冠。根管进行清理、预备,去除玷污层后高压灭菌。然后将牙根接种粪肠球菌,孵育3周。将牙齿随机分为四组(n = 20),分别用AHP、ESM和CC封闭剂以及2%牙胶尖采用冷侧方加压技术进行根管充填。第四组作为对照组。30天后,从根管中收集牙本质碎屑,接种于血琼脂培养基上培养。报告菌落计数,并采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

30天后,AHP组平均菌落计数为23.73±13.84,ESM组为34.78±18.75,CC组为28.47±13.73。三个实验组在这方面的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.102)。

结论

在本体外研究的局限性内,结果表明30天后AHP、ESM和CC封闭剂对感染牙本质小管中的粪肠球菌具有相当的抗菌活性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b48e/11658299/a7a612dcb61e/12903_2024_5192_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验