• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情第一波期间长期护理中的照护目标对话

Goals of Care Conversations in Long-Term Care during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Mallery Laurie, Shetty Nabha, Moorhouse Paige, Miller Ashley Paige, von Maltzahn Maia, Buckler Melissa, MacLeod Tanya, Stewart Samuel A, Krueger-Naug Anne Marie

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 19;11(6):1710. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061710.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11061710
PMID:35330035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8950529/
Abstract

Goals of care discussions typically focus on decision maker preference and underemphasize prognosis and outcomes related to frailty, resulting in poorly informed decisions. Our objective was to determine whether navigated care planning with nursing home residents or their decision makers changed care plans during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The MED-LTC virtual consultation service, led by internal medicine specialists, conducted care planning conversations that balanced information-giving/physician guidance with resident autonomy. Consultation included (1) the assessment of co-morbidities, frailty, health trajectory, and capacity; (2) in-depth discussion with decision makers about health status and expected outcomes; and (3) co-development of a care plan. Non-parametric tests and logistic regression determined the significance and factors associated with a change in care plan. Sixty-three residents received virtual consultations to review care goals. Consultation resulted in less aggressive care decisions for 52 residents (83%), while 10 (16%) remained the same. One resident escalated their care plan after a mistaken diagnosis of dementia was corrected. Pre-consultation, 50 residents would have accepted intubation compared to 9 post-consultation. The de-escalation of care plans was associated with dementia, COVID-19 positive status, and advanced frailty. We conclude that during the COVID-19 pandemic, a specialist-led consultation service for frail nursing home residents significantly influenced decisions towards less aggressive care.

摘要

照护目标讨论通常侧重于决策者的偏好,而对与衰弱相关的预后和结果重视不足,导致决策缺乏充分信息。我们的目标是确定在新冠疫情第一波期间,为养老院居民或其决策者提供的导航式照护规划是否会改变照护计划。由内科专家主导的MED-LTC虚拟咨询服务开展了照护规划对话,在提供信息/医生指导与居民自主性之间取得平衡。咨询内容包括:(1)评估合并症、衰弱、健康轨迹和能力;(2)与决策者深入讨论健康状况和预期结果;(3)共同制定照护计划。非参数检验和逻辑回归确定了与照护计划改变相关的显著性和因素。63名居民接受了虚拟咨询以审查照护目标。咨询后,52名居民(83%)的照护决策变得不那么激进,而10名居民(16%)的决策保持不变。一名居民在痴呆症误诊被纠正后提高了其照护计划。咨询前,50名居民会接受插管,咨询后这一数字为9名。照护计划的降级与痴呆症、新冠病毒检测呈阳性状态和严重衰弱有关。我们得出结论,在新冠疫情期间,为衰弱的养老院居民提供的由专家主导的咨询服务显著影响了决策,使其倾向于采取不那么激进的照护措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/fd98e6b3165c/jcm-11-01710-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/5087be37dbae/jcm-11-01710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/06aec3cf92f7/jcm-11-01710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/3f75e69e34fb/jcm-11-01710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/fd98e6b3165c/jcm-11-01710-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/5087be37dbae/jcm-11-01710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/06aec3cf92f7/jcm-11-01710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/3f75e69e34fb/jcm-11-01710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/8950529/fd98e6b3165c/jcm-11-01710-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Goals of Care Conversations in Long-Term Care during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情第一波期间长期护理中的照护目标对话
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 19;11(6):1710. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061710.
2
Fidelity to a behavioral intervention to improve goals of care decisions for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.对一项行为干预措施的依从性,该措施旨在改善晚期痴呆症养老院居民的护理决策目标。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):599-604. doi: 10.1177/1740774516650863. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
3
Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期痴呆症护理目标干预的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.
4
Training Residents in Virtual Advance Care Planning: A New Twist in Telehealth.对住院医师进行虚拟预立医疗计划培训:远程医疗的新变化
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Oct;62(4):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.019. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
Advance Care Planning in Dutch Nursing Homes During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.荷兰养老护理机构在 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间的预先护理计划。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.10.014. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
6
An observational case series of targeted virtual geriatric medicine and palliative care consults for hospitalized older adults with COVID-19.一项针对 COVID-19 住院老年患者的虚拟老年医学和姑息治疗目标性观察性病例系列研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;10(6):6297-6306. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-117. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
7
COVID-19's Influence on Information and Communication Technologies in Long-Term Care: Results From a Web-Based Survey With Long-Term Care Administrators.新冠疫情对长期护理中信息与通信技术的影响:一项针对长期护理管理人员的网络调查结果
JMIR Aging. 2022 Jan 12;5(1):e32442. doi: 10.2196/32442.
8
'We DECide optimized' - training nursing home staff in shared decision-making skills for advance care planning conversations in dementia care: protocol of a pretest-posttest cluster randomized trial.“我们决定优化”——培训养老院工作人员在痴呆症护理中进行预先护理计划谈话的共同决策技能:一项预试验后测试的群组随机试验方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1044-z.
9
A Novel Collaborative Care Program to Augment Nursing Home Care During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.一项新的协作式护理计划,以增强新冠疫情期间和之后的养老院护理。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):304-307.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
10
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Long-Term Care in Canada.**标题**:COVID-19 大流行对加拿大长期护理的影响。
Healthc Q. 2021 Oct;24(3):13-15. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2021.26625.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Goals of Care Consultation for Advanced Frailty: a Qualitative Implementation Study Providing Insights from the Pandemic.晚期衰弱的虚拟照护咨询目标:一项提供大流行见解的定性实施研究
Can Geriatr J. 2025 Mar 1;28(1):1-15. doi: 10.5770/cgj.28.759. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Eight Ways General Internists Can Practice High-Value, Low-Carbon Care: The Canadian Society of Internal Medicine's Climate Conscious Choosing Wisely Canada Recommendations.普通内科医生践行高价值、低碳医疗的八种方式:加拿大内科协会的“明智选择加拿大——气候意识倡议”建议
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1609-1616. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09441-6. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality after in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 住院心搏骤停患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jul;164:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.025. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
Does determining the degree of frailty help pandemic decision-making when resources are scarce?在资源稀缺时,确定衰弱程度是否有助于大流行决策?
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Mar;2(3):e119-e120. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00030-1. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause 30-Day Mortality in Nursing Home Residents With COVID-19.
Successful Care Conferences: Nursing Home Staff, Persons with Dementia, and Caregiver Perspectives.
成功的护理会议:养老院工作人员、痴呆症患者及护理人员的观点
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Apr;26(4):105504. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105504. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
与 COVID-19 养老院居民全因 30 天死亡率相关的风险因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):439-448. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7968.
4
Clinical frailty scale and mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.临床虚弱量表与 COVID-19 死亡率:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;93:104324. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104324. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
5
Timing of Intubation and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.2019年冠状病毒病患者的插管时机与院内死亡率
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Oct 21;2(10):e0254. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000254. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Mortality Rates in a Diverse Cohort of Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Novel Coronavirus in the Urban Midwest.美国中西部城市地区新型冠状病毒感染的机械通气患者不同队列中的死亡率
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Aug 20;2(8):e0187. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000187. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of 11 721 Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Hospitalized Across the United States.美国11721例2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者的特征及预后
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 18;72(10):e558-e565. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1268.
8
A Structured Tool for Communication and Care Planning in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行时代的沟通和护理计划结构化工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):943-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.062. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Nation-Wide Observational Study of Cardiac Arrests Occurring in Nursing Homes and Nursing Facilities in Singapore.新加坡养老院和护理设施中心心搏骤停的全国性观察研究。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020 May;49(5):285-293.
10
A Systematic Review of Frailty Trajectories: Their Shape and Influencing Factors.系统评价衰弱轨迹:其形状及其影响因素。
Gerontologist. 2021 Nov 15;61(8):e463-e475. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa061.