Chen Shi, van der Meij Leander, van Zyl Llewellyn E, Demerouti Evangelia
Human Performance Management Group, Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University (VTC), Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 7;13:795686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795686. eCollection 2022.
Finding meaning in our lives is a central tenet to the human experience and a core contributor to mental health. Individuals tend to actively seek the sources of meaning in their lives or consciously enact efforts to create or "craft" meaning in different life domains. These overall "Life Crafting" behaviors refer to the conscious efforts individuals exert to create meaning in their lives through (a) cognitively (re-)framing how they view life, (b) seeking social support systems to manage life challenges, and (c) actively seeking challenges to facilitate personal growth. Specifically, these behaviors are actioned to better align life goals, personal needs, values, and capabilities. However, no psychological assessment instrument currently exists to measure overall life crafting. As such, the purpose of this paper was twofold: to conceptualize life crafting and to develop, validate and evaluate a robust measure of overall life crafting. A mixed-method, multi-study research design was employed. , nine participants were interviewed to determine the methods or techniques used to craft meaningful life experiences. These methods/techniques were used as indicators to create an initial item pool which was then reviewed by a panel of experts to ensure face validity. , in Study 1, the factorial structure of the instrument was explored by gathering data from a convenience sample ( = 331), with the results showing support for a three-factor structure of life crafting, consisting of (a) cognitive crafting, (b) seeking social support, and (c) seeking challenges. , in Study 2 ( = 362), the aim was to confirm the factorial structure of the Life Crafting scale and to determine its level of internal consistency, partial measurement invariance across genders, and criterion validity [meaning in life (β = 0.91), mental health (β = 0.91), work engagement (β = 0.54), and job burnout (β = -0.42)]. The results supported a second-order factorial model of Life Crafting, which comprised of three first-order factors (cognitive crafting, seeking social support, and seeking challenges). Therefore, the Life Crafting Scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument to measure- and track the effectiveness of life crafting interventions.
在我们的生活中寻找意义是人类体验的核心原则,也是心理健康的核心要素。个体倾向于积极探寻生活中意义的来源,或有意识地努力在不同生活领域创造或“精心打造”意义。这些总体的“生活塑造”行为指的是个体通过以下方式有意识地努力在生活中创造意义:(a) 从认知上(重新)构建他们对生活的看法;(b) 寻求社会支持系统来应对生活挑战;(c) 积极寻求挑战以促进个人成长。具体而言,这些行为旨在使生活目标、个人需求、价值观和能力更好地契合。然而,目前尚无心理评估工具来衡量总体生活塑造。因此,本文的目的有两个:对生活塑造进行概念化,并开发、验证和评估一种强大的总体生活塑造测量方法。采用了混合方法、多研究的研究设计。首先,采访了九名参与者,以确定用于精心打造有意义生活经历的方法或技巧。这些方法/技巧被用作指标来创建初始项目池,然后由专家小组进行审查以确保表面效度。其次,在研究1中,通过从便利样本(n = 331)收集数据来探索该工具的因子结构,结果表明支持生活塑造的三因素结构,包括:(a) 认知塑造;(b) 寻求社会支持;(c) 寻求挑战。再次,在研究2(n = 362)中,目的是确认生活塑造量表的因子结构,并确定其内部一致性水平、不同性别间的部分测量不变性以及效标效度[生活意义(β = 0.91)、心理健康(β = 0.91)、工作投入(β = 0.54)和职业倦怠(β = -0.42)]。结果支持了生活塑造的二阶因子模型,该模型由三个一阶因子(认知塑造、寻求社会支持和寻求挑战)组成。因此,生活塑造量表可作为一种有效且可靠的工具,用于测量和跟踪生活塑造干预措施的效果。