El-Tamalawy Mona M, Soliman Moetaza M, Omara Amany F, Rashad Amal, Ibrahim Osama M, El-Shishtawy Mamdouh M
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 7;13:855764. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.855764. eCollection 2022.
Neostigmine has been found to improve survival in animal models of sepsis. However, its feasibility, efficacy, and safety in patients with sepsis or septic shock have not been investigated. This parallel randomized controlled double-blinded design aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of neostigmine as an adjunctive therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock. A total of 167 adult patients with sepsis or septic shock were assessed for eligibility; 50 patients were randomized to receive a continuous infusion of neostigmine (0.2 mg/h for 120 h; neostigmine arm) or 0.9% saline (control arm) in addition to standard therapy. The primary outcome was the change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores 120 h after therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes included mortality rates and changes in procalcitonin level. The median (interquartile range) change in SOFA scores improved significantly in the neostigmine arm [-2 (-5, 1)] as compared with the control arm [1.5 (0, 2.8); = 0.007]. Progression from sepsis to septic shock was more frequent in the control arm ( = 0.01). The incidence of shock reversal in patients with septic shock was significantly lower in the control arm than in the neostigmine arm ( = 0.04). Differences in 28-days mortality rates did not reach statistical significance between the control and neostigmine arms ( = 0.36). Percentage change in procalcitonin levels was similar in both arms ( = 0.74). Neostigmine adjunctive therapy may be safe and effective when administered in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04130230.
已发现新斯的明可提高脓毒症动物模型的存活率。然而,其在脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者中的可行性、疗效和安全性尚未得到研究。本平行随机对照双盲设计旨在研究新斯的明作为脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。共评估了167例成年脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的 eligibility;50例患者被随机分配接受新斯的明持续输注(0.2mg/h,共120小时;新斯的明组)或0.9%生理盐水(对照组),同时接受标准治疗。主要结局是治疗开始后120小时序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的变化。次要结局包括死亡率和降钙素原水平的变化。与对照组[1.5(0,2.8);P = 0.007]相比,新斯的明组SOFA评分的中位数(四分位间距)变化显著改善[-2(-5,1)]。对照组中从脓毒症进展为脓毒性休克的情况更常见(P = 0.01)。脓毒性休克患者中休克逆转的发生率在对照组显著低于新斯的明组(P = 0.04)。对照组和新斯的明组之间28天死亡率的差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.36)。两组降钙素原水平的百分比变化相似(P = 0.74)。新斯的明辅助治疗在脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者中使用时可能是安全有效的。临床试验注册:NCT04130230。