• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)支架置入或血管成形术治疗颅内颈动脉狭窄:病例系列和新的应用。

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) stenting or angioplasty for intracranial carotid artery stenosis: Case series and novel application.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Aug;29(4):351-357. doi: 10.1177/15910199221090724. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1177/15910199221090724
PMID:35331034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10399509/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher rate of stroke compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This is likely due to procedural emboli resulting from plaque disruption. The transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) method aims to reduce the stroke rate by flow-reversal. TCAR, which has yet to be utilized for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), may be particularly valuable given the lack of surgical treatment options for intracranial arterial stenosis.

OBJECTIVE

Presented here are five cases of angioplasty or stenting that demonstrate the feasibility of TCAR for intracranial Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) stenosis treatment.

METHODS

Five cases were reviewed retrospectively and summarized using PROCESS and CARE guidelines.

RESULTS

All patients who underwent intervention between the petrous and ophthalmic segment of the ICA had no new neurologic deficit nor detected embolic stroke. One patient experienced an asymptomatic 5 mm hemorrhage on postoperative routine Computed Tomography (CT) head imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

This highlights a new method for treating intracranial ICA stenosis with a potentially reduced stroke risk. Given the historically higher stroke rates for cervical ICA stenting compared to carotid artery endarterectomy, this method may improve the previously higher stroke rates in endovascular carotid artery treatment, compared to CEA. Although this series is small, it illustrates a novel use for a rising technique that should be further evaluated in a larger study to validate its efficacy as a new treatment modality for surgically inaccessible intracranial disease.

摘要

背景

与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)相比,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后发生中风的风险更高。这可能是由于斑块破裂导致的操作过程中产生的栓子。经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)旨在通过血流反转来降低中风率。TCAR 尚未用于颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病(ICAD),但鉴于颅内动脉狭窄缺乏手术治疗选择,它可能特别有价值。

目的

本文介绍了 5 例血管成形术或支架置入术,证明了 TCAR 治疗颅内颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄的可行性。

方法

回顾性分析了 5 例患者,采用 PROCESS 和 CARE 指南进行总结。

结果

所有在 ICA 岩骨段和眼段之间进行介入治疗的患者均无新发神经功能缺损或检测到栓塞性中风。1 例患者在术后常规计算机断层扫描(CT)头部成像上发现无症状性 5mm 出血。

结论

这突出了一种治疗颅内 ICA 狭窄的新方法,可能降低中风风险。鉴于颈内动脉支架置入术的中风发生率 historically 高于 CEA,与 CEA 相比,这种方法可能会降低血管内颈动脉治疗的先前更高的中风率。尽管本系列病例数量较少,但它说明了一种新兴技术的新用途,应该在更大的研究中进一步评估,以验证其作为一种新的治疗方法治疗手术不可及的颅内疾病的有效性。

相似文献

1
Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) stenting or angioplasty for intracranial carotid artery stenosis: Case series and novel application.经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)支架置入或血管成形术治疗颅内颈动脉狭窄:病例系列和新的应用。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Aug;29(4):351-357. doi: 10.1177/15910199221090724. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Severity of stenosis in symptomatic patients undergoing carotid interventions might influence perioperative neurologic events.症状性颈动脉介入治疗患者的狭窄严重程度可能影响围手术期神经系统事件。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):741-749.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.044. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
4
Predicting Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Adverse Outcomes by Imaging Characteristics.通过影像学特征预测经颈动脉血运重建不良结局。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:388-401. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Outcomes of early transcarotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy after acute neurologic events.急性神经事件后早期经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):760-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
Association of carotid revascularization approach with perioperative outcomes based on symptom status and degree of stenosis among octogenarians.基于症状和狭窄程度,80 岁及以上人群颈动脉血运重建方法与围手术期结局的相关性。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):769-777.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.027. Epub 2022 May 25.
8
Physiologic risk factors increase risk of myocardial infarction with transcarotid artery revascularization in prospective trials.生理风险因素会增加经颈动脉血运重建术治疗的前瞻性试验中心肌梗死的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):1192-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Carotid endarterectomy and transcarotid artery revascularization can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.颈动脉内膜切除术和经颈动脉血管重建术可在慢性肾脏病患者中以可接受的发病率和死亡率进行。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
10
The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy.年龄对经颈动脉血管重建术、经股颈动脉血管支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术住院治疗结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):931-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The PROCESS 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasESeries in Surgery (PROCESS) Guidelines.《2020年手术病例系列报告共识优先报告指南(PROCESS)更新指南》
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
A multi-institutional analysis of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to carotid endarterectomy.多机构分析经颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.060. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
3
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal: Bypassing the Arch and Limiting Distal Emboli.血流逆转的经颈动脉血管重建术:绕过主动脉弓并限制远端栓子
Neurosurgery. 2017 Nov 1;81(5):N41-N42. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx456.
4
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal.血流逆转的经颈动脉血管重建术。
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1526602817693607. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
5
Severe symptomatic intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis treated with intracranial stenting: a single center study with 58 patients.颅内支架置入术治疗症状性重度颈内动脉颅内段狭窄:一项纳入58例患者的单中心研究
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):178-83. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.15191.
6
Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER经颈动脉支架置入术联合动态血流逆转多中心试验的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.460.
7
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial.支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状颈动脉狭窄的长期疗效:国际颈动脉支架置入术研究(ICSS)随机试验
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):529-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
The CARE (CAse REport) guidelines and the standardization of case reports.CARE(病例报告)指南与病例报告的标准化
J Med Case Rep. 2013 Nov 27;7:261. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-261.
9
Are distal protection devices 'protective' during carotid angioplasty and stenting?远端保护装置在颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术中是否具有保护作用?
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):1962-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607820. Epub 2011 May 12.
10
Stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 28;363(18):1766-7; author reply 1768. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1009626.