Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 19;22(6):2381. doi: 10.3390/s22062381.
This paper seeks to evaluate and calibrate data collected by low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors in different environments and using different aggregated temporal units (i.e., 5-s, 1-min, 10-min, 30 min intervals). We first collected PM concentrations (i.e., PM, PM, and PM) data in five different environments (i.e., indoor and outdoor of an office building, a train platform and lobby of a subway station, and a seaside location) in Hong Kong, using five AirBeam2 sensors as the low-cost sensors and a TSI DustTrak DRX Aerosol Monitor 8533 as the reference sensor. By comparing the collected PM concentrations, we found high linearity and correlation between the data reported by the AirBeam2 sensors in different environments. Furthermore, the results suggest that the accuracy and bias of the PM data reported by the AirBeam2 sensors are affected by rainy weather and environments with high humidity and a high level of hygroscopic salts (i.e., a seaside location). In addition, increasing the aggregation level of the temporal units (i.e., from 5-s to 30 min intervals) increases the correlation between the PM concentrations obtained by the AirBeam2 sensors, while it does not significantly improve the accuracy and bias of the data. Lastly, our results indicate that using a machine learning model (i.e., random forest) for the calibration of PM concentrations collected on sunny days generates better results than those obtained with multiple linear models. These findings have important implications for researchers when designing environmental exposure studies based on low-cost PM sensors.
本论文旨在评估和校准在不同环境中使用不同时间聚合单元(即 5 秒、1 分钟、10 分钟和 30 分钟间隔)收集的低成本颗粒物(PM)传感器数据。我们首先在香港的五个不同环境(即办公楼的室内和室外、地铁站的站台和大厅以及海滨位置)使用五个 AirBeam2 传感器作为低成本传感器和 TSI DustTrak DRX Aerosol Monitor 8533 作为参考传感器收集 PM 浓度(即 PM、PM 和 PM)数据。通过比较收集到的 PM 浓度,我们发现 AirBeam2 传感器在不同环境下报告的数据具有高度的线性和相关性。此外,结果表明,AirBeam2 传感器报告的 PM 数据的准确性和偏差受天气状况以及高湿度和高吸湿盐水平(即海滨位置)的环境影响。此外,增加时间聚合单元的聚合水平(即从 5 秒到 30 分钟间隔)会增加 AirBeam2 传感器获得的 PM 浓度之间的相关性,而不会显著提高数据的准确性和偏差。最后,我们的结果表明,在晴天使用机器学习模型(即随机森林)对 PM 浓度进行校准比使用多元线性模型获得的结果更好。这些发现对于研究人员在基于低成本 PM 传感器设计环境暴露研究时具有重要意义。