• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国安帕瓦地区 2016 年疫情后寨卡病毒血清流行率。

Seroprevalence of Zika Virus in Amphawa District, Thailand, after the 2016 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Tropical Pediatrics, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.

出版信息

Viruses. 2022 Feb 25;14(3):476. doi: 10.3390/v14030476.

DOI:10.3390/v14030476
PMID:35336883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8953292/
Abstract

In 2016, Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was declared a public health emergency of international concern because of the neurological consequences in babies born to infected people. Because of the mild and nonspecific symptoms, serological tests are essential in epidemiological studies. However, cross-reactive antibodies between other Flaviviridae members may complicate the interpretation of results of these tests. This study investigated the seroprevalence of ZIKV infection in Samut Songkhram in central Thailand which was affected by the Zika outbreak of 2016. Three hundred and fifty volunteers aged 5-50 years in Amphawa District, Samut Songkhram, were enrolled between April 2017 and April 2018. ZIKV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) immunoglobulin G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to screen serum samples collected on the first day of enrollment and after 6 and 12 months. The seroprevalence and seroconversion of ZIKV were assessed. Cases of ZIKV seroconversion were verified as evidence of ZIKV infection by NS1 blockade-of-binding ELISA and plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50). ZIKV seroprevalence in Amphawa was 15.1-17.8% with no significant change over the year. The total seroconversion rate throughout the year was 7/100 person-years. The ratio of asymptomatic to symptomatic infections was 4.5:1. The cases in our study confirmed the occurrence of occult ZIKV infections in the community. These undetected infections might promote the spread of ZIKV in vulnerable groups of the community.

摘要

2016 年,寨卡病毒(ZIKV)感染因其对感染人群所生婴儿的神经后果而被宣布为国际关注的公共卫生紧急事件。由于症状轻微且无特异性,血清学检测在流行病学研究中至关重要。然而,其他黄病毒科成员之间的交叉反应性抗体可能会使这些检测结果的解释复杂化。本研究调查了 2016 年寨卡疫情中受影响的泰国中部北榄府沙没颂堪的寨卡病毒感染血清流行率。2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 4 月,在沙没颂堪府安帕哇区招募了 350 名年龄在 5-50 岁的志愿者。使用寨卡病毒非结构蛋白 1(NS1)免疫球蛋白 G 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)筛选首次入组当天和 6 个月和 12 个月收集的血清样本。评估寨卡病毒的血清流行率和血清转化率。寨卡病毒血清学转换病例通过 NS1 结合阻断 ELISA 和蚀斑减少中和试验(PRNT50)确认为寨卡病毒感染的证据。安帕哇的寨卡病毒血清流行率为 15.1-17.8%,全年无显著变化。全年总血清转化率为 7/100 人年。无症状感染与症状感染的比例为 4.5:1。本研究中的病例证实了社区中隐匿性寨卡病毒感染的发生。这些未被发现的感染可能会促进寨卡病毒在社区弱势群体中的传播。

相似文献

1
Seroprevalence of Zika Virus in Amphawa District, Thailand, after the 2016 Pandemic.泰国安帕瓦地区 2016 年疫情后寨卡病毒血清流行率。
Viruses. 2022 Feb 25;14(3):476. doi: 10.3390/v14030476.
2
Prevalence of Zika virus neutralizing antibodies in healthy adults in Vietnam during and after the Zika virus epidemic season: a longitudinal population-based survey.寨卡病毒流行期间和流行季节过后越南健康成年人中寨卡病毒中和抗体的流行情况:一项基于人群的纵向调查。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 May 11;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05042-2.
3
Survey on neutralizing antibodies against Zika virus eighteen months post-outbreak in two southern Thailand communities.泰国南部两个社区暴发寨卡病毒 18 个月后对中和抗体的调查。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05654-8.
4
Seroprevalence of Flavivirus Neutralizing Antibodies in Thailand by High-Throughput Neutralization Assay: Endemic Circulation of Zika Virus before 2012.泰国高通量中和测定法检测黄病毒中和抗体的血清流行率:2012 年之前寨卡病毒的地方性流行
mSphere. 2021 Aug 25;6(4):e0033921. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00339-21. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
5
Incorporation of IgG Depletion in a Neutralization Assay Facilitates Differential Diagnosis of Zika and Dengue in Secondary Flavivirus Infection Cases.在中和测定法中加入 IgG 耗竭可促进在二次黄病毒感染病例中寨卡病毒和登革热的鉴别诊断。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00234-18. Print 2018 Jun.
6
Zika Virus Antibody Titers Three Years after Confirmed Infection.寨卡病毒抗体滴度在确诊感染三年后。
Viruses. 2021 Jul 12;13(7):1345. doi: 10.3390/v13071345.
7
Comprehensive Evaluation of Differential Serodiagnosis between Zika and Dengue Viral Infections. Zika 和登革热病毒感染的血清学诊断差异的综合评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Feb 27;57(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01506-18. Print 2019 Mar.
8
Combination of Nonstructural Protein 1-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays Can Detect and Distinguish Various Dengue Virus and Zika Virus Infections.基于非结构蛋白 1 的酶联免疫吸附测定的联合应用可检测和区分不同的登革热病毒和 Zika 病毒感染。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01464-18. Print 2019 Feb.
9
Incidence of Zika Virus Infection from a Dengue Epidemiological Study of Children in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand.泰国叻丕府儿童登革热流行病学研究中寨卡病毒感染的发生率。
Viruses. 2021 Sep 10;13(9):1802. doi: 10.3390/v13091802.
10
Engineered NS1 for Sensitive, Specific Zika Virus Diagnosis from Patient Serology.工程化 NS1 用于从患者血清学中进行敏感、特异的寨卡病毒诊断。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 May;27(5):1427-1437. doi: 10.3201/eid2705.190121.

引用本文的文献

1
Interepidemic xenosurveillance of Japanese encephalitis virus and Zika virus in mosquitoes from Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand.泰国乌汶叻差他尼府蚊虫中日本脑炎病毒和寨卡病毒的流行间期异种监测。
Vet World. 2024 Jul;17(7):1555-1561. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1555-1561. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
2
Emerging and re-emerging zoonotic viral diseases in Southeast Asia: One Health challenge.东南亚新出现和再现的人畜共患病毒性疾病:One Health 挑战。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 13;11:1141483. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1141483. eCollection 2023.
3
Arbovirus Seroprevalence Study in Bangphae District, Ratchaburi Province, Thailand: Comparison between ELISA and a Multiplex Rapid Diagnostic Test (Chembio DPP ZCD IgG).

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of Zika Virus Infection from a Dengue Epidemiological Study of Children in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand.泰国叻丕府儿童登革热流行病学研究中寨卡病毒感染的发生率。
Viruses. 2021 Sep 10;13(9):1802. doi: 10.3390/v13091802.
2
Seroprevalence of Zika virus in pregnant women from central Thailand.泰国中部孕妇中寨卡病毒的血清流行率。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0257205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257205. eCollection 2021.
3
Survey on neutralizing antibodies against Zika virus eighteen months post-outbreak in two southern Thailand communities.
泰国叻丕府邦帕艾区虫媒病毒血清流行率研究:酶联免疫吸附测定法与多重快速诊断检测(Chembio DPP ZCD IgG)的比较
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 15;7(11):378. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7110378.
4
Combining Immunoassays to Identify Zika Virus Infection in Dengue-Endemic Areas.在登革热流行地区联合免疫测定法以识别寨卡病毒感染
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 21;7(10):254. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7100254.
泰国南部两个社区暴发寨卡病毒 18 个月后对中和抗体的调查。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05654-8.
4
Zika Virus Disease Comparing Children and Adults in a Dengue-Endemic Setting. Zika 病毒病:在登革热流行地区比较儿童和成人。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Nov 9;104(2):557-563. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0795.
5
Zika seroprevalence declines and neutralizing antibodies wane in adults following outbreaks in French Polynesia and Fiji.法属波利尼西亚和斐济暴发寨卡疫情后,成年人的寨卡血清流行率下降,中和抗体衰减。
Elife. 2020 Jan 28;9:e48460. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48460.
6
Zika Virus Infection - After the Pandemic.寨卡病毒感染——大流行之后
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1444-1457. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1808246.
7
Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Diversity of Zika Virus from Field-Caught Mosquitoes in Various Regions of Thailand.泰国不同地区野外捕获蚊子中寨卡病毒的分子流行病学与遗传多样性
Pathogens. 2019 Mar 6;8(1):30. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8010030.
8
Long-term circulation of Zika virus in Thailand: an observational study.泰国寨卡病毒的长期循环:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;19(4):439-446. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30718-7. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Analysis of Zika virus neutralizing antibodies in normal healthy Thais.分析正常健康泰国人体内的寨卡病毒中和抗体。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 21;8(1):17193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35643-6.
10
Combination of Nonstructural Protein 1-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays Can Detect and Distinguish Various Dengue Virus and Zika Virus Infections.基于非结构蛋白 1 的酶联免疫吸附测定的联合应用可检测和区分不同的登革热病毒和 Zika 病毒感染。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01464-18. Print 2019 Feb.