National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;19(4):439-446. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30718-7. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Little is known about the historical and current risk of Zika virus infection in southeast Asia, where the mosquito vector is widespread and other arboviruses circulate endemically. Centralised Zika virus surveillance began in Thailand in January, 2016. We assessed the long-term circulation of Zika virus in Thailand.
In this observational study, we analysed data from individuals with suspected Zika virus infection who presented at hospitals throughout the country and had biological samples (serum, plasma, or urine) tested for confirmation with PCR at the National Institute of Health laboratories in Bangkok. We analysed the spatial and age distribution of cases, and constructed time-resolved phylogenetic trees using genomes from Thailand and elsewhere to estimate when Zika virus was first introduced.
Of the 3089 samples from 1717 symptomatic individuals tested between January, 2016, and December, 2017, 368 were confirmed to have Zika virus infection. Cases of Zika virus infection were reported throughout the year, and from 29 of the 76 Thai provinces. Individuals had 2·8 times (95% CI 2·3-3·6) the odds of testing positive for Zika virus infection if they came from the same district and were sick within the same year of a person with a confirmed infection relative to the odds of testing positive anywhere, consistent with focal transmission. The probability of cases being younger than 10 years was 0·99 times (0·72-1·30) the probability of being that age in the underlying population. This probability rose to 1·62 (1·33-1·92) among those aged 21-30 years and fell to 0·53 (0·40-0·66) for those older than 50 years. This age distribution is consistent with that observed in the Zika virus epidemic in Colombia. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest persistent circulation within Thailand since at least 2002.
Our evidence shows that Zika virus has circulated at a low but sustained level for at least 16 years, suggesting that Zika virus can adapt to persistent endemic transmission. Health systems need to adapt to cope with regular occurrences of the severe complications associated with infection.
European Research Council, National Science Foundation, and National Institutes of Health.
在东南亚,蚊子媒介广泛存在,其他虫媒病毒也呈地方性流行,关于寨卡病毒感染的历史和当前风险知之甚少。2016 年 1 月,泰国开始进行集中寨卡病毒监测。我们评估了泰国寨卡病毒的长期流行情况。
在这项观察性研究中,我们分析了来自全国各地医院就诊的疑似寨卡病毒感染患者的生物样本(血清、血浆或尿液),这些样本在曼谷的国家卫生研究院实验室使用 PCR 进行了确认检测。我们分析了病例的空间和年龄分布,并构建了时间分辨的系统发育树,使用来自泰国和其他地方的基因组来估计寨卡病毒何时首次传入。
在 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间,对 1717 名有症状个体的 3089 个样本进行了检测,其中 368 个样本被证实感染了寨卡病毒。寨卡病毒感染病例全年均有报告,涉及泰国 76 个府中的 29 个。如果患者来自同一地区,且与确诊感染患者同年患病,那么他们感染寨卡病毒的可能性是在任何地方检测呈阳性的 2.8 倍(95%CI 2.3-3.6),这表明存在局部传播。年龄小于 10 岁的病例发生概率是该年龄段人群基础发生率的 0.99 倍(0.72-1.30)。21-30 岁人群的发病概率升至 1.62 倍(1.33-1.92),50 岁以上人群的发病概率降至 0.53 倍(0.40-0.66)。这种年龄分布与哥伦比亚寨卡病毒流行期间的观察结果一致。系统发育重建表明,寨卡病毒自 2002 年以来一直在泰国境内持续低水平传播。
我们的证据表明,寨卡病毒至少已在 16 年内以低但持续的水平传播,表明寨卡病毒能够适应持续的地方性传播。卫生系统需要适应与感染相关的严重并发症的频繁发生。
欧洲研究理事会、美国国家科学基金会和美国国立卫生研究院。