Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02214-z.
Pancreatic portal hypertension (PPH) is a type of extrahepatic portal hypertension. We compared the clinical efficacy of different treatment methods for PPH caused by splenic vein stenosis in chronic pancreatitis.
This article retrospectively analyzed the PPH cases that were caused by splenic vein stenosis after chronic pancreatitis. Patients were divided into three groups according to the different treatments: splenic vein stent implantation (stent group), splenectomy, and only medications (conservative group). The treatment effects from each group were compared.
A total of 33 patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study (9, 12, and 12 patients in each group respectively). All the procedures were successful in the stent and splenectomy groups. During the follow-up, no patient had gastrointestinal bleeding recurrence in the stent and splenectomy groups. However, in the conservative group, the incidence of portal hypertensive gastropathy and upper gastrointestinal bleeding were 50% and 25%. In the stent group, all the varicose veins at the base of the stomach had shrunk by varying degrees, and the red color signs regressed. The stent patency rate was 100%. No major complication occurred. The average platelet count at 1, 3, 6-months postoperatively were all significantly higher than the preoperative value (P < 0.05). The average postoperative hospital stay duration was significantly shorter than that of the splenectomy group (3.1 ± 1.4 days vs. 16.1 ± 8.1 days; P < 0.05). In the splenectomy group, postoperative fever occurred in 4 patients. Postoperative infection occurred in 2 patients (one with abdominal cavity infection and the other with incision infection). Delayed abdominal bleeding occurred in one patient. Portal vein thrombosis occurred in 2 patients during follow up.
Percutaneous splenic vein stent implantation for PPH treatment reduces the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with minimal invasive. It has a high safety and reliable efficacy and is worthy of further clinical promotion.
胰性门静脉高压症(PPH)是一种肝外门静脉高压症。我们比较了不同方法治疗慢性胰腺炎所致脾静脉狭窄引起的 PPH 的临床疗效。
本研究回顾性分析了由慢性胰腺炎引起的脾静脉狭窄所致 PPH 病例。根据不同治疗方法将患者分为三组:脾静脉支架植入(支架组)、脾切除术和仅药物治疗(保守组)。比较各组的治疗效果。
本研究共回顾性分析了 33 例患者(支架组、脾切除术组和保守组各 9、12 和 12 例)。支架组和脾切除术组的所有手术均成功完成。在随访期间,支架组和脾切除术组均未发生胃底静脉曲张再出血。然而,在保守组,门静脉高压性胃病和上消化道出血的发生率分别为 50%和 25%。支架组所有胃底静脉曲张均有不同程度缩小,红色征消退。支架通畅率为 100%。无重大并发症发生。术后 1、3、6 个月的平均血小板计数均明显高于术前(P < 0.05)。术后平均住院时间明显短于脾切除术组(3.1 ± 1.4 天比 16.1 ± 8.1 天;P < 0.05)。脾切除术组术后发热 4 例,术后感染 2 例(腹腔感染 1 例,切口感染 1 例),迟发性腹腔出血 1 例,门静脉血栓形成 2 例。
经皮脾静脉支架植入术治疗 PPH 创伤小,可降低胃肠道出血风险。具有较高的安全性和可靠的疗效,值得进一步临床推广。