Suppr超能文献

共同决策、以患者为中心的沟通与患者满意度——一项横断面分析。

Shared decision making, patient-centered communication and patient satisfaction - A cross-sectional analysis.

作者信息

Siebinga Veerle Y, Driever Ellen M, Stiggelbout Anne M, Brand Paul L P

机构信息

Department of Innovation and Research, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Department of Innovation and Research, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2145-2150. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The integration of shared decision making (SDM) and patient-centered communication (PCC) is needed to actively involve patients in decision making. This study examined the relationship between shared decision making and patient-centered communication.

METHODS

In 82 videotaped hospital outpatient consultations by 41 medical specialists from 18 disciplines, we assessed the extent of shared decision making by the OPTION score and patient-centered communication by the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS), and analyzed the occurrence of a high versus low degree (above or below median) of SDM and/or PCC, and its relation to patient satisfaction scores.

RESULTS

In comparison to earlier studies, we observed comparable 4HCS scores and relatively low OPTION scores. The correlation between the two was weak (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). In 38% of consultations, we observed a combination of high SDM and low PCC scores or vice versa. The combination of a high SDM and high PCC, which was observed in 23% of consultations, was associated with significantly higher patient satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSION

Shared decision making and patient-centered communication are not synonymous and do not always co-exist.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The value of integrated training of shared decision making and patient-centered communication should be further explored.

摘要

目的

需要将共同决策(SDM)与以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)相结合,以使患者积极参与决策。本研究考察了共同决策与以患者为中心的沟通之间的关系。

方法

我们对来自18个学科的41名医学专家进行的82次医院门诊咨询录像进行了评估,通过OPTION评分评估共同决策的程度,通过四习惯编码方案(4HCS)评估以患者为中心的沟通情况,并分析了高程度与低程度(高于或低于中位数)的共同决策和/或以患者为中心的沟通的发生情况及其与患者满意度评分的关系。

结果

与早期研究相比,我们观察到4HCS评分相当,而OPTION评分相对较低。两者之间的相关性较弱(r = 0.29,p = 0.009)。在38%的咨询中,我们观察到高共同决策得分与低以患者为中心的沟通得分的组合,反之亦然。在23%的咨询中观察到的高共同决策与高以患者为中心的沟通的组合与显著更高的患者满意度评分相关。

结论

共同决策和以患者为中心的沟通不是同义词,也并非总是同时存在。

实践意义

应进一步探索共同决策和以患者为中心的沟通综合培训的价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验