Nishimwe Kizito, Bowers Erin L, de Dieu Ayabagabo Jean, Habimana Richard, Mutiga Samuel, Maier Dirk E
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
School of Agriculture and Food Science, University of Rwanda, PO Box 4285, Kigali, Rwanda.
Mycotoxin Res. 2022 May;38(2):107-115. doi: 10.1007/s12550-022-00454-2. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
Milk is susceptible to aflatoxin M1 (AFM) contamination when dairy cattle consume feed contaminated with aflatoxins and is considered as a public health concern. This pilot study assessed the prevalence and amount of total aflatoxin contamination in commercially available dairy feed and the corresponding AFM contamination in raw milk from samples collected at farms using local, commercially available dairy feed across Rwanda's five provinces. The inclusion criteria to select dairy farm participants were (1) to have at least two cows and (2) use of commercially prepared dairy feeds. Importantly, the majority of cattle rearing households in Rwanda rely principally on grazing or other freely available feedstock, rather than on commercially prepared feeds. In total, 170 raw milk samples were collected during one sampling period from dairy farms using commercially prepared dairy feeds. In addition, 154 dairy feed samples were collected simultaneously with the milk samples. These farms were previously targeted in a larger study measuring aflatoxin contamination of Rwandan feeds and feed ingredients. The mean AFM concentration in these samples was 0.89 ± 1.64 µg/l (median: 0.33 µg/l) with a maximum of 14.5 µg/l. Maize bran was the principal dairy feed ingredient used by farmers in the sampling, representing more than 65% of the total feed samples collected, with mean aflatoxin concentration of 90.5 µg/kg (median 32.3 µg/kg). The authors note that this preliminary sampling is not generalizable across Rwandan milk production and consumption; the limited pilot study presented here was not designed with the robustness necessary for broad-scale generalization. Thus, the data presented should not be broadly applied outside of the context of the study.
当奶牛食用受黄曲霉毒素污染的饲料时,牛奶易受黄曲霉毒素M1(AFM)污染,这被视为一个公共卫生问题。这项初步研究评估了卢旺达五个省份使用当地市售奶牛饲料的农场采集的市售奶牛饲料中总黄曲霉毒素污染的流行情况和含量,以及原料奶中相应的AFM污染情况。选择奶牛场参与者的纳入标准为:(1)至少有两头奶牛;(2)使用市售奶牛饲料。重要的是,卢旺达的大多数养牛户主要依靠放牧或其他免费可得的饲料原料,而非市售饲料。在一个采样期内,共从使用市售奶牛饲料的奶牛场采集了170份原料奶样本。此外,与牛奶样本同时采集了154份奶牛饲料样本。这些农场此前是一项规模更大的研究的对象,该研究测量了卢旺达饲料和饲料原料的黄曲霉毒素污染情况。这些样本中的AFM平均浓度为0.89±1.64微克/升(中位数:0.33微克/升),最高为14.5微克/升。玉米麸是采样中农民使用的主要奶牛饲料成分,占所采集饲料样本总数的65%以上,黄曲霉毒素平均浓度为90.5微克/千克(中位数32.3微克/千克)。作者指出,这项初步采样不能推广到卢旺达的牛奶生产和消费情况;这里呈现的有限的初步研究并非为广泛推广所需的稳健性而设计。因此,所呈现的数据不应在研究背景之外广泛应用。