Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Centre for Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;20(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3.
There is a strong stigma attached to mental disorders preventing those affected from getting psychological help. The consequences of stigma are worse for racial and/or ethnic minorities compared to racial and/or ethnic majorities since the former often experience other social adversities such as poverty and discrimination within policies and institutions. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the evidence on the impact of differences in mental illness stigma between racial minorities and majorities.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included cross-sectional studies comparing mental illness stigma between racial minorities and majorities. Systematic searches were conducted in the bibliographic databases of PubMed, PsycINFO and EMBASE until 20th December 2018. Outcomes were extracted from published reports, and meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses were conducted in CMA software.
After screening 2787 abstracts, 29 studies with 193,418 participants (N = 35,836 in racial minorities) were eligible for analyses. Racial minorities showed more stigma than racial majorities (g = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12 ~ 0.27) for common mental disorders. Sensitivity analyses showed robustness of these results. Multivariate meta-regression analyses pointed to the possible moderating role of the number of studies with high risk of bias on the effect size. Racial minorities have more stigma for common mental disorders when compared with majorities. Limitations included moderate to high risk of bias, high heterogeneity, few studies in most comparisons, and the use of non-standardized outcome measures.
Mental illness stigma is higher among ethnic minorities than majorities. An important clinical implication of these findings would be to tailor anti-stigma strategies related with mental illnesses according to specific racial and/or ethnic backgrounds with the intention to improve mental health outreach.
精神障碍带来的污名化现象十分严重,使得患者无法获得心理帮助。与多数群体相比,少数族裔和/或少数民族受到污名化的影响更为严重,因为他们往往还面临着其他社会逆境,例如政策和制度内的贫困和歧视。这是第一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,旨在总结少数族裔和多数族裔之间精神疾病污名差异的证据。
本系统性综述和荟萃分析纳入了比较少数族裔和多数族裔之间精神疾病污名差异的横断面研究。在 2018 年 12 月 20 日之前,我们在 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 EMBASE 这三个文献数据库中进行了系统性检索。从已发表的报告、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析中提取了结果,并在 CMA 软件中进行了分析。
在筛选了 2787 篇摘要后,共有 29 项研究(共 193418 名参与者,其中 35836 名参与者来自少数族裔)符合分析标准。少数族裔的污名化程度高于多数族裔(常见精神障碍的 g 值为 0.20(95%CI:0.12 至 0.27))。敏感性分析显示,这些结果是稳健的。多变量荟萃回归分析表明,偏倚风险高的研究数量可能对效应大小具有调节作用。与多数族裔相比,少数族裔的常见精神障碍污名化程度更高。局限性包括偏倚风险较高、异质性较大、大多数比较中研究较少以及使用非标准化的结局测量。
少数民族的精神疾病污名化程度高于多数族裔。这些发现的一个重要临床意义是,根据特定的种族和/或族裔背景,针对与精神疾病相关的污名化策略进行定制,以改善精神健康服务的推广。