Neurolysis for analgesia following pectus repair in a national cohort.

INTRODUCTION

Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum are the most common chest wall deformities of childhood. Surgical repair can be complicated by post-operative analgesic challenges. Thoracic epidural analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia, and multimodal pain control are among the most common strategies. We sought to define the current utilization of intraoperative thoracic neurolysis, hypothesizing that this would minimize length of stay (LOS) and post-operative narcotic use with relatively higher proportion of non-narcotic post-operative analgesia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database between 2017 and 2020. We first identified patients who underwent a pectus repair via ICD-10-PCS codes. We used ICD-10-PCS codes 01580ZZ and 01584ZZ to identify those patients who underwent concomitant thoracic neurolysis. Statistical analyses were performed using R; p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

We identified 2979 patients who underwent a pectus repair. 184 underwent a concomitant thoracic nerve destruction procedure (6.7%); 13 were performed in 2017 (2.01%), 76 in 2018 (10.7%), and 84 in 2019 (9.6%). LOS was shorter in those patients who underwent neurolysis (mean=2.55 vs 3.73 days, SD=1.33 vs 1.78 days, p<0.001). There were fewer post-operative ICU admissions in neurolysis patients (3/184 vs. 193/2795, p = 0.003). The cost of procedures that included a neurolysis were higher, though not significantly so (mean=$24,885.64 vs $22,200.59).

CONCLUSION

Thoracic neurolysis may be a useful analgesic strategy, expediating post-operative discharge and potentially obviating the need for intensive care. Further larger-scale prospective trials should be considered to further elucidate the role of this analgesia method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.