• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于公园的干预措施对青少年健康相关结果的影响:系统评价。

The Effects of Park-Based Interventions on Health-Related Outcomes Among Youth: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior, 41474UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

166700RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jul;36(6):1029-1044. doi: 10.1177/08901171221077812. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1177/08901171221077812
PMID:35343240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9197949/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to present a comprehensive systematic review of the effects of park-based interventions on health outcomes among youth, defined as children and adolescents.

DATA SOURCE

Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases searched through November 2020.

STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Interventions conducted in publicly accessible parks that evaluated health outcomes (i.e., physical, mental, and emotional); focused on children and adolescents (up to 18 years old, or up to 22 years old for individuals with developmental needs); and was published in English, Spanish, and Chinese.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of the 15 included studies using the Guide to Community Preventive Services tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Descriptive summary of study characteristics and summarized methodological quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were person-based interventions involving the evaluation of health outcome changes in cohorts, and the remaining studies were park-based, focused on changing the park environment and observing changes in youth participation in parks. All identified interventions were positively associated with individual-level and park-level outcomes ranging from body weight, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity, park utilization, and health behavior knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrated that parks as sites of interventions can provide an environment that promotes health and wellbeing for youth. Nevertheless, the number of relevant studies were limited, thus it is important to leverage and expand on existing knowledge of the utility of parks as sites of intervention to address health concerns at this critical juncture of the life course.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在全面系统地综述基于公园的干预措施对儿童和青少年这一定义下的青年健康结果的影响。

资料来源

通过 2020 年 11 月在 Web of Science、MEDLINE 和 Scopus 数据库中搜索。

研究纳入和排除标准

在公共可进入的公园中进行的、评估健康结果(即身体、心理和情感)的干预措施;关注儿童和青少年(最多 18 岁,或有发育需求的个体最多 22 岁);并以英语、西班牙语和中文发表。

资料提取

两名独立审查员使用社区预防服务指南工具提取数据并评估了 15 项纳入研究的质量。

资料综合

研究特征的描述性总结和研究方法质量的总结。

结果

12 项研究为基于个人的干预措施,涉及评估队列中健康结果的变化,其余研究为基于公园的研究,侧重于改变公园环境并观察青年参与公园的变化。所有确定的干预措施都与个体和公园层面的结果呈正相关,范围从体重、中等到剧烈强度的身体活动、公园利用率和健康行为知识。

结论

本系统综述表明,作为干预场所的公园可以为青年提供促进健康和福祉的环境。然而,相关研究的数量有限,因此,重要的是利用和扩展现有关于公园作为干预场所的效用的知识,以解决生命历程这一关键时刻的健康问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79d/9198398/2ebfd044a9ad/10.1177_08901171221077812-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79d/9198398/2ebfd044a9ad/10.1177_08901171221077812-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79d/9198398/2ebfd044a9ad/10.1177_08901171221077812-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effects of Park-Based Interventions on Health-Related Outcomes Among Youth: A Systematic Review.基于公园的干预措施对青少年健康相关结果的影响:系统评价。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jul;36(6):1029-1044. doi: 10.1177/08901171221077812. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
2
The effects of park-based interventions on health: a systematic review protocol.基于公园的干预措施对健康的影响:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 8;9(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01396-5.
3
Effects of park-based interventions on health-related outcomes: A systematic review.基于公园的干预措施对健康相关结果的影响:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106528. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106528. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Park-based physical activity interventions for persons with disabilities: A mixed-methods systematic review.基于公园的身体活动干预措施对残疾人士的影响:一项混合方法系统评价。
Disabil Health J. 2019 Jan;12(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis.城市绿地干预的环境、健康、福利、社会和公平影响:元叙述证据综合。
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104923. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Park environment and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in parks among adolescents in a high-density city: the moderating role of neighbourhood income.高密度城市中公园环境与青少年在公园中的中高强度身体活动:邻里收入的调节作用。
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Aug 16;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00289-7.
8
The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review.基于网络的项目对学龄儿童肥胖症减轻的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.
9
"We actually care and we want to make the parks better": A qualitative study of youth experiences and perceptions after conducting park audits.“我们真的很在意,并且希望让公园变得更好”:一项关于开展公园审计后青少年体验与认知的定性研究
Prev Med. 2017 Feb;95 Suppl:S109-S114. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.043. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
10
Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls.青春期女孩的公园活动与体育锻炼
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1381-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1226.

引用本文的文献

1
Modifying urban planning to promote child health: A scoping review of reviews.修改城市规划以促进儿童健康:综述的范围研究
Health Promot Perspect. 2024 Dec 30;14(4):319-335. doi: 10.34172/hpp.42995. eCollection 2024.
2
Greenspaces and Health: Scoping Review of studies in Europe.绿地与健康:欧洲研究的范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2024 May 20;45:1606863. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606863. eCollection 2024.
3
Association Between Park Use and Moderate-to-Vigorous Activity During COVID-19 Years among a Cohort of Low-Income Youth.

本文引用的文献

1
2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: summary of the evidence.2020 年世卫组织关于 5-17 岁儿童和青少年身体活动与久坐行为的指南:证据总结。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z.
2
Physical inactivity, non-participation in sports and socioeconomic status: a large population-based study among Norwegian adolescents.体力活动不足、不参与体育运动与社会经济地位:一项针对挪威青少年的大型基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):1010. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09141-2.
3
Association of a Park-Based Violence Prevention and Mental Health Promotion After-School Program With Youth Arrest Rates.
新冠疫情期间,与低收入青少年队列中适度至剧烈活动相关的公园使用情况。
J Urban Health. 2024 Apr;101(2):300-307. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00856-w. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
基于公园的暴力预防和精神健康促进课后项目与青少年逮捕率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919996. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19996.
4
France's 2018 Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth: Results and International Comparisons.法国 2018 年儿童和青少年体力活动报告卡:结果与国际比较。
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Mar 1;17(3):270-277. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0241.
5
Built environment and physical activity among adolescents: the moderating effects of neighborhood safety and social support.青少年的建筑环境与身体活动:邻里安全和社会支持的调节作用。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Dec 18;16(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0898-y.
6
Neighborhood characteristics associated with park use and park-based physical activity among children in low-income diverse neighborhoods in New York City.与纽约市低收入多元化社区儿童使用公园和基于公园的身体活动相关的邻里特征。
Prev Med. 2020 Feb;131:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105948. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
7
Trends in physical fitness among Canadian children and youth.加拿大儿童和青少年体质趋势。
Health Rep. 2019 Oct 16;30(10):3-13. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x201901000001-eng.
8
How Does Park Use and Physical Activity Differ between Childhood and Adolescence? A Focus on Gender and Race-Ethnicity.儿童期和青春期的朴槿惠使用和身体活动有何不同?关注性别和种族-民族差异。
J Urban Health. 2019 Oct;96(5):692-702. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00388-8.
9
Efficacy of a compulsory homework programme for increasing physical activity and improving nutrition in children: a cluster randomised controlled trial.强制性家庭作业方案对增加儿童身体活动和改善营养的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Sep 5;16(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0840-3.
10
Transforming City Streets To Promote Physical Activity And Health Equity.将城市街道改造成促进身体活动和健康公平的空间。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1475-1483. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00454.