Department of Health Behavior, 41474UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
166700RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jul;36(6):1029-1044. doi: 10.1177/08901171221077812. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
The purpose of the study is to present a comprehensive systematic review of the effects of park-based interventions on health outcomes among youth, defined as children and adolescents.
Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases searched through November 2020.
Interventions conducted in publicly accessible parks that evaluated health outcomes (i.e., physical, mental, and emotional); focused on children and adolescents (up to 18 years old, or up to 22 years old for individuals with developmental needs); and was published in English, Spanish, and Chinese.
Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of the 15 included studies using the Guide to Community Preventive Services tool.
Descriptive summary of study characteristics and summarized methodological quality of the studies.
Twelve studies were person-based interventions involving the evaluation of health outcome changes in cohorts, and the remaining studies were park-based, focused on changing the park environment and observing changes in youth participation in parks. All identified interventions were positively associated with individual-level and park-level outcomes ranging from body weight, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity, park utilization, and health behavior knowledge.
This systematic review demonstrated that parks as sites of interventions can provide an environment that promotes health and wellbeing for youth. Nevertheless, the number of relevant studies were limited, thus it is important to leverage and expand on existing knowledge of the utility of parks as sites of intervention to address health concerns at this critical juncture of the life course.
本研究旨在全面系统地综述基于公园的干预措施对儿童和青少年这一定义下的青年健康结果的影响。
通过 2020 年 11 月在 Web of Science、MEDLINE 和 Scopus 数据库中搜索。
在公共可进入的公园中进行的、评估健康结果(即身体、心理和情感)的干预措施;关注儿童和青少年(最多 18 岁,或有发育需求的个体最多 22 岁);并以英语、西班牙语和中文发表。
两名独立审查员使用社区预防服务指南工具提取数据并评估了 15 项纳入研究的质量。
研究特征的描述性总结和研究方法质量的总结。
12 项研究为基于个人的干预措施,涉及评估队列中健康结果的变化,其余研究为基于公园的研究,侧重于改变公园环境并观察青年参与公园的变化。所有确定的干预措施都与个体和公园层面的结果呈正相关,范围从体重、中等到剧烈强度的身体活动、公园利用率和健康行为知识。
本系统综述表明,作为干预场所的公园可以为青年提供促进健康和福祉的环境。然而,相关研究的数量有限,因此,重要的是利用和扩展现有关于公园作为干预场所的效用的知识,以解决生命历程这一关键时刻的健康问题。