Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Sports Traumatology, BG Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Feb;143(2):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04403-7. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
Arthroscopic reconstruction techniques of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee have been developed in recent years. Reconstruction techniques for higher-grade PLC injuries have not yet been validated in clinical studies. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of two different techniques and to present results of the first prospective randomized clinical trial of patients to undergo these novel procedures.
19 patients with Fanelli Type B posterolateral corner injuries and additional posterior cruciate ligament ruptures were included in this prospective study. They were randomly assigned to one of two novel arthroscopic reconstruction techniques, based on open surgeries developed by Arciero (group A) and LaPrade (group B). Follow-up was conducted at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and included clinical examinations for lateral, rotational and posterior stability, range of motion and subjective clinical outcome scores (IKDC Subjective Score, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale and Numeric Rating Scale for pain).
At 6 and 12 months postoperative, all patients in both groups presented stable to varus, external rotational and posterior forces, there were no significant differences between the two groups. At 12-month follow-up, group A patients showed significantly higher maximum flexion angles (134.17° ± 3.76° vs. 126.60° ± 4.22°; p = 0.021) compared to patients of group B. Duration of surgery was significantly longer in Group B patients than in group A (121.88 ± 11.63 vs. 165.00 ± 35.65 min; p = 0.003). Posterior drawer (side-to-side difference) remained more reduced in group A (2.50 ± 0.69 mm vs. 3.27 ± 0.92 mm; p = 0.184). Subjective patient outcome scores showed no significant differences between groups (Lysholm Score 83.33 ± 7.79 vs. 86.40 ± 9.21; p = 0.621).
This study indicates sufficient restoration of posterolateral rotational instability, varus instability and posterior drawer after arthroscopic posterolateral corner reconstruction without neurovascular complications. Increased postoperative range of motion and a shorter and less invasive surgical procedure could favor the arthroscopic reconstruction technique according to Arciero over LaPrade's technique in future treatment considerations.
近年来,膝关节后外侧角(PLC)的关节镜重建技术已经得到了发展。对于更高等级的 PLC 损伤的重建技术尚未在临床研究中得到验证。本研究旨在比较两种不同技术的临床结果,并介绍首例接受这些新型手术的患者的前瞻性随机临床试验结果。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 19 例 Fanelli 型 B 型后外侧角损伤合并后交叉韧带断裂的患者。根据 Arciero(A 组)和 LaPrade(B 组)开发的开放手术,他们被随机分配到两种新的关节镜重建技术之一。术后 6 个月和 12 个月进行随访,包括对侧、旋转和后向稳定性、活动范围和主观临床结果评分(IKDC 主观评分、Lysholm 评分、Tegner 活动量表和疼痛数字评分量表)进行临床检查。
术后 6 个月和 12 个月,两组患者在所有情况下均表现出对向、外旋和后向力的稳定,两组间无显著差异。在 12 个月的随访中,A 组患者的最大屈曲角度显著高于 B 组(134.17°±3.76° vs. 126.60°±4.22°;p=0.021)。B 组患者的手术时间明显长于 A 组(121.88±11.63 vs. 165.00±35.65 分钟;p=0.003)。A 组患者的后抽屉试验(侧-侧差值)仍明显较小(2.50±0.69 毫米 vs. 3.27±0.92 毫米;p=0.184)。两组患者的主观临床结果评分无显著差异(Lysholm 评分 83.33±7.79 与 86.40±9.21;p=0.621)。
本研究表明,关节镜后外侧角重建后,可充分恢复后外侧旋转不稳定、内翻不稳定和后抽屉试验,且无神经血管并发症。增加术后活动范围和更短、侵袭性更小的手术过程可能有利于未来治疗考虑中,根据 Arciero 的技术而非 LaPrade 的技术进行关节镜重建。