• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利希滕斯坦术与经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗单侧非复发性腹股沟疝:一项关于临床结局的多中心短期随机对照研究

Lichtenstein versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair for unilateral non recurrent hernia: A multicenter short term randomized comparative study of clinical outcomes.

作者信息

Sultan Ahmed Abd El Aal, Abo Elazm Hossam Attia, Omran Hisham

机构信息

General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams University, Egypt.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Mar 18;76:103428. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103428. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103428
PMID:35345792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8957018/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The repair of inguinal hernia is still one of the most prevalent surgical procedures done worldwide. Among all repair techniques, open Lichtenstein repair is the most globally conducted. In the past few decades, laparoscopic technique for inguinal hernia repair has increased technical demand. -abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) technique is the main approach, which is featured by less postoperative pain and early recovery.

OBJECTIVE

The current work is a short-term study to make a comparison between open Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia as well as laparoscopic -abdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia (TAPP) for unilateral non recurrent hernia regarding intraoperative, postoperative complications and hospital stay.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present prospective randomized study recruited 100 male subjects from General Surgery Department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals and Ain Shams university hospitals suffering from oblique inguinal hernia (unilateral non recurrent hernia) with an age above 18 years and good overall health, who were randomized into two groups: Group A: 49 cases were subjected to laparoscopic -abdominal pre-peritoneal repair (TAPP). Group B: 51 cases were subjected to open Lichtenstein repair.

RESULTS

This study detected less post-operative pain day 0, day 1, day 7 and 1 month postoperatively. There was no significant difference at 6 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Finally, we concluded that TAPP repair for inguinal hernia (unilateral non recurrent hernia) safer with less early post-operative pain. Also, it has fewer complications, with a significantly longer operative time.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术仍是全球最常见的外科手术之一。在所有修补技术中,开放式李金斯坦修补术是全球开展最多的。在过去几十年中,腹股沟疝修补的腹腔镜技术对技术要求有所提高。腹腔腹膜前修补术(TAPP)是主要方法,其特点是术后疼痛较轻且恢复较早。

目的

本研究是一项短期研究,旨在比较开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜腹股沟疝腹腔腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗单侧非复发性疝的术中、术后并发症及住院时间。

患者与方法

本前瞻性随机研究从爱资哈尔大学医院和艾因夏姆斯大学医院普通外科招募了100名年龄在18岁以上、总体健康状况良好的男性斜疝(单侧非复发性疝)患者,随机分为两组:A组:49例接受腹腔镜腹腔腹膜前修补术(TAPP)。B组:51例接受开放式李金斯坦修补术。

结果

本研究发现术后第0天、第1天、第7天和1个月时术后疼痛较轻。术后6个月时无显著差异。

结论

最后,我们得出结论,腹股沟疝(单侧非复发性疝)的TAPP修补术更安全,术后早期疼痛更少。此外,其并发症更少,但手术时间明显更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/082d0bd58c8e/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/adf91e46f1d6/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/3c8c3f71d4d3/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/1b5c361a97a1/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/082d0bd58c8e/fx4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/adf91e46f1d6/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/3c8c3f71d4d3/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/1b5c361a97a1/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90dd/8957018/082d0bd58c8e/fx4.jpg

相似文献

1
Lichtenstein versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair for unilateral non recurrent hernia: A multicenter short term randomized comparative study of clinical outcomes.利希滕斯坦术与经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗单侧非复发性腹股沟疝:一项关于临床结局的多中心短期随机对照研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Mar 18;76:103428. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103428. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Comparison of Common Postoperative Complications Between Lichtenstein Open Repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) Repair for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia.单侧腹股沟疝Lichtenstein开放式修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)术后常见并发症的比较
Cureus. 2021 Sep 10;13(9):e17863. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17863. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein无张力腹股沟疝修补术后短期并发症的比较:一项随机试验研究
Minerva Chir. 2015 Apr;70(2):83-9. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
4
A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较
Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1774-1780.
5
Comparison between TAPP & Lichtenstein techniques for inguinal hernia repair: A retrospective cohort study.腹股沟疝修补术的TAPP与Lichtenstein技术比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 11;72:103054. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103054. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
[Operative strategy and short-term efficacy of recurrent groin hernia].[复发性腹股沟疝的手术策略及短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):761-765.
7
A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias.一项比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
Return to Work in Patients With Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approach and Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Repair.单侧腹股沟疝手术患者的重返工作情况:腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与李金斯坦无张力疝修补术的比较研究
Cureus. 2023 May 18;15(5):e39202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39202. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.原发性腹股沟疝:开放、腹腔镜经腹腹膜前、完全腹膜外和机器人腹膜前修补术的系统评价和贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析比较。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Early Outcomes of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修补术的早期疗效
Cureus. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):e35567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35567. eCollection 2023 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of modified tumescent and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective clinical study.改良肿胀技术与传统腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231220789. doi: 10.1177/03000605231220789.
2
[Inguinal hernia operations-Always outpatient?].腹股沟疝手术——总是门诊手术吗?
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;94(3):230-236. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01818-9. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between TAPP & Lichtenstein techniques for inguinal hernia repair: A retrospective cohort study.腹股沟疝修补术的TAPP与Lichtenstein技术比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 11;72:103054. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103054. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Quality of life after open versus laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for unilateral inguinal hernias.
开放式与腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术治疗单侧腹股沟疝术后生活质量比较。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Oct;44(10):1266-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Quality-of-life scores in laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的生活质量评分
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3467-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4631-x. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
5
Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.单孔与传统腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1356-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4378-4. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
6
Prospective, randomized and controlled study of mesh displacement after laparoscopic inguinal repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后补片移位的前瞻性、随机对照研究:补片固定与不固定的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1134-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4314-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
7
Transabdominal preperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized studies.经腹腹膜前修补术与完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较:随机研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2013 Aug;206(2):245-252.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.041. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
8
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safer than open repair: analysis of the NSQIP data.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术比开放修补术更安全:美国国立外科手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据分析
J Surg Res. 2009 Oct;156(2):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.061. Epub 2009 May 3.
9
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.欧洲疝学会关于成人腹股沟疝治疗的指南。
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
10
Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study.腹腔镜与开放切口疝修补术:一项开放性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):555-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9229-5. Epub 2007 Feb 16.