开放获取费用：神经病学实习生学术活动的障碍。
Open Access Fees: A Barrier to Scholarly Activity Among Neurology Trainees.
作者信息
Lam Keng, Langer-Gould Annette
机构信息
Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Neurology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA.
出版信息
Perm J. 2021 Nov 29;25:21.041. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.041.
Abstract
The open access publishing model provides readers of all backgrounds access to articles free of charge. To cover the costs of open access, however, many journals now charge substantial article processing fees. This has inadvertently created yet another barrier for trainees to engage in scholarly activity. Herein, we describe the issue, review the literature, and provide suggestions for addressing this barrier with the focus on the neurology specialty.
摘要
开放获取出版模式使各种背景的读者都能免费阅读文章。然而，为了支付开放获取的成本，现在许多期刊都收取高额的文章处理费。这无意中又给实习生参与学术活动造成了另一障碍。在此，我们描述这一问题，回顾相关文献，并针对这一障碍提出解决建议，重点关注神经病学专业。
相似文献
1
Open Access Fees: A Barrier to Scholarly Activity Among Neurology Trainees.开放获取费用：神经病学实习生学术活动的障碍。
Perm J. 2021 Nov 29;25:21.041. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.041.
2
The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology.神经科学和神经病学领域掠夺性开放获取现象的激增。
Neuroscience. 2017 Jun 14;353:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取：文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
4
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.潜在的掠夺性和正规生物医学期刊：你能区分出来吗？一项横断面比较。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
5
A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.学术开放获取期刊的创新特征研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 16;13(4):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1802.
6
Reasons to temper enthusiasm about open access nursing journals.对开放获取护理期刊的热情需降温的原因。
Contemp Nurse. 2017 Apr;53(2):262-266. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1257922. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
Open access of publications by veterinary faculty in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大兽医学院教员出版物的开放获取情况。
J Vet Med Educ. 2011 Spring;38(1):33-41. doi: 10.3138/jvme.38.1.33.
8
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
9
A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany.德国机构在开放获取出版费用方面的支出研究。
PeerJ. 2016 Aug 9;4:e2323. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2323. eCollection 2016.
10
The Post-Embargo Open Access Citation Advantage: It Exists (Probably), Its Modest (Usually), and the Rich Get Richer (of Course).禁运期后的开放获取引文优势：它存在（可能），程度有限（通常），而富者更富（当然）。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 22;11(8):e0159614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159614. eCollection 2016.
引用本文的文献
1
Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023.作者面临的开放获取出版障碍：2004年至2023年的范围界定文献综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 20;12(8):250257. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250257. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Paying to publish: A cross-sectional analysis of article processing charges and journal characteristics among 87 pathology journals.付费出版：87种病理学杂志的文章处理费及期刊特征横断面分析
Acad Pathol. 2024 Nov 20;11(4):100153. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2024.100153. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
本文引用的文献
1
Understanding of medical students about predatory journals: A comparative study from KSA and New Zealand.沙特阿拉伯和新西兰医学生对掠夺性期刊的认知：一项比较研究
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Aug 21;15(5):339-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.07.010. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Open access publishers: The new players.开放获取出版商：新的参与者。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0233432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233432. eCollection 2020.
3
Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows.临床和研究研究员的开放获取出版和公开获取的出版习惯和看法。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):47-58. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.751. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
4
Opinion and Special Articles: Mentoring in neurology: Where are the clinician-scientists? Is residency to blame?观点与专题文章：神经学领域的指导：临床科学家都在哪里？住院医师培训该为此负责吗？
Neurology. 2019 Jun 11;92(24):1159-1162. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007657.
5
Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing.重新审视“掠夺性开放获取出版”这一术语。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 8;34(13):e99. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e99.
6
Open Access Publishing and Subsequent Citations Among Articles in Major Cardiovascular Journals.主要心血管期刊文章中的开放获取出版与后续引文。
Am J Med. 2019 Sep;132(9):1103-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
7
Problems and challenges of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊的问题与挑战。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15039. Epub 2018 May 29.
8
The hidden agenda of predatory journals: A warning call for junior researchers and student authors.掠夺性期刊的隐藏议程：给初级研究人员和学生作者的警钟。
Med Teach. 2018 Dec;40(12):1306-1307. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1414942. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact.肿瘤学期刊文章的开放获取：现状与引用影响。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2612-2617. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx398.
10
Opinion and Special Articles: Creation of a diversity and inclusion certificate program for neurology residents.
Neurology. 2017 Sep 19;89(12):e146-e148. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004387.
Zotero 插件