Suppr超能文献

护士工作场所横向暴力的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevalence of lateral violence in nurse workplace: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

School of Nursing, Soochow University Medical College, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e054014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of inter-nurse lateral violence (LV) reported in current studies is inconsistent, ranging from 7% to 83%. The purpose of this study is to quantify the prevalence of LV in nurses' workplaces.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies (up to 27 January 2021). We included cross-sectional, case-control or cohort studies in which both abusers and victims were nurses. Studies that did not provide specific data on abusers were excluded. Stata V.16.0 was used for statistical analysis. Fixed-effect or random-effect model was adopted according to heterogeneity, which was evaluated by Cochran's Q and values. The main indicator was LV prevalence. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to investigate the sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 6124 nurses were included. Further, 13 articles with 5745 nurses were included in the meta-analysis, and the pooled prevalence of LV among nurses was 33.08% (95% CI: 23.41% to 42.75%, p<0.05; =99.0%). The remaining one study containing 370 samples reported that the prevalence of inter-nurse LV was 7.92%. Subgroup analysis showed that region, sample size, sampling, study's quality, response rate and publication time might not be the sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression indicated that sample size had the main influence on model heterogeneity. Egger's test showed the existence of publication bias (p=0.03).

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of inter-nurse LV is high in nurse workplace. It is suggested that scholars pay more attention to the cultural differences of inter-nurse LV between regions in the future. This study has the following limitations: there is a lack of studies on LV prevalence in many countries; lack of standard assessment tools; no grey literature was searched.

摘要

背景

目前研究报道的护士间横向暴力(LV)发生率不一致,范围为 7%至 83%。本研究旨在量化护士工作场所中 LV 的发生率。

方法

系统综述和荟萃分析。检索 Cochrane、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、CNKI 和万方数据库中截至 2021 年 1 月 27 日的相关研究。纳入同时报告施虐者和受害者为护士的横断面、病例对照或队列研究。排除未提供施虐者具体数据的研究。采用 Stata V.16.0 进行统计分析。根据异质性采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行评估,采用 Cochran's Q 和 I ² 值评估异质性。主要指标为 LV 发生率。进行敏感性分析、亚组分析和荟萃回归分析,以探讨异质性的来源。

结果

共纳入 14 项研究,共纳入 6124 名护士。进一步对其中 13 项包含 5745 名护士的研究进行荟萃分析,护士中 LV 的总发生率为 33.08%(95%CI:23.41%至 42.75%,p<0.05;I ² =99.0%)。剩下的一项包含 370 个样本的研究报告护士间 LV 的发生率为 7.92%。亚组分析显示,地区、样本量、抽样方法、研究质量、应答率和发表时间可能不是异质性的来源。荟萃回归表明,样本量是造成模型异质性的主要因素。Egger 检验显示存在发表偏倚(p=0.03)。

讨论

护士工作场所中 LV 的发生率较高。建议未来学者更加关注地区间护士间 LV 的文化差异。本研究存在以下局限性:许多国家缺乏 LV 发生率的研究;缺乏标准的评估工具;未检索灰色文献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3f/8966576/d5cd48ba10a6/bmjopen-2021-054014f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验