Chen Long, Gao Huixin, Wang Zhongpeng, Gu Bin, Zhou Wanqi, Pang Meijun, Zhang Kuo, Liu Xiuyun, Ming Dong
Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Haihe Laboratory of Brain-computer Interaction and Human-machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Oct;18(5):3107-3124. doi: 10.1007/s11571-024-10143-8. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
Ischemic stroke (IS) is characterized by high mortality, disability rates, and a high risk of recurrence. Motor dysfunction, such as limb hemiparesis, dysphagia, auditory disorders, and speech disorders, usually persists after stroke, which imposes a heavy burden on society and the health care system. Traditional rehabilitation therapies may be ineffective in promoting functional recovery after stroke, and alternative strategies are urgently needed. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved invasive vagus nerve stimulation (iVNS) for the improvement of refractory epilepsy, treatment-resistant depression, obesity, and moderate to severe upper limb motor impairment following chronic ischemic stroke. Additionally, the FDA has approved transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) for the improvement of cluster headaches and acute migraines. Recent studies have demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has neuroprotective effects in both transient and permanent cerebral ischemia animal models, significantly improving upper limb motor impairments, auditory deficits, and swallowing difficulties. Firstly, this article reviews two potential neuronal death pathways following IS, including autophagy and inflammatory responses. Then delves into the current status of preclinical and clinical research on the functional recovery following IS with VNS, as well as the potential mechanisms mediating its neuroprotective effects. Finally, the optimal parameters and timing of VNS application are summarized, and the future challenges and directions of VNS in the treatment of IS are discussed. The application of VNS in stroke rehabilitation research has reached a critical stage, and determining how to safely and effectively translate this technology into clinical practice is of utmost importance. Further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to elucidate the therapeutic mechanisms of VNS.
缺血性中风(IS)的特点是死亡率高、致残率高且复发风险高。运动功能障碍,如肢体偏瘫、吞咽困难、听觉障碍和言语障碍,通常在中风后持续存在,给社会和医疗保健系统带来沉重负担。传统的康复治疗在促进中风后的功能恢复方面可能无效,因此迫切需要替代策略。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)已批准侵入性迷走神经刺激(iVNS)用于改善难治性癫痫、难治性抑郁症、肥胖症以及慢性缺血性中风后的中重度上肢运动障碍。此外,FDA已批准经皮迷走神经刺激(tVNS)用于改善丛集性头痛和急性偏头痛。最近的研究表明,迷走神经刺激(VNS)在短暂性和永久性脑缺血动物模型中均具有神经保护作用,可显著改善上肢运动障碍、听觉缺陷和吞咽困难。首先,本文综述了IS后的两条潜在神经元死亡途径,包括自噬和炎症反应。然后深入探讨了VNS治疗IS后功能恢复的临床前和临床研究现状,以及介导其神经保护作用的潜在机制。最后,总结了VNS应用的最佳参数和时机,并讨论了VNS在治疗IS方面未来面临的挑战和方向。VNS在中风康复研究中的应用已进入关键阶段,确定如何安全有效地将该技术转化为临床实践至关重要。需要进一步的临床前和临床研究来阐明VNS的治疗机制。