• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急情况下为住院患者提供缺席投票和在 COVID-19 期间投票:一项 50 个州的研究。

Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.

机构信息

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;22(4):1000-1009. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884
PMID:35354012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8328173/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Voters facing illness or disability are disproportionately under-represented in terms of voter turnout. Earlier research has indicated that enfranchisement of these populations may reinforce the implementation of policies improving health outcomes and equity. Due to the confluence of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the 2020 election, we aimed to assess emergency absentee voting processes, which allow voters hospitalized after regular absentee deadlines to still obtain an absentee ballot, and election changes due to COVID-19 in all 50 states.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study collecting 34 variables pertaining to emergency voting processes and COVID-19-related election changes, including deadlines, methods of submission for applications and ballots, and specialized services for patients. Data were obtained from, in order of priority, state boards of elections websites, poll worker manuals, application forms, and state legislation. We verified all data through direct correspondence with state boards of elections.

RESULTS

Emergency absentee voting processes are in place in 39 states, with the remaining states having universal vote-by-mail (n = 5) or extended regular absentee voting deadlines (n = 6). The emergency absentee period most commonly began within 24 hours following the normal absentee application deadline, which was often seven days before an election (n = 11). Unique aspects of emergency voting processes included patients designating an "authorized agent" to deliver their applications and ballots (n = 38), electronic ballot delivery (n = 5), and in-person teams that deliver ballots directly to patients (n = 18). Documented barriers in these processes nationwide include unavailable online information (n = 11), restrictions mandating agents to be family members (n = 7), physician affidavits or signatures (n = 9), and notary or witness signature requirements (n = 15). For the November 2020 presidential election, 12 states expanded absentee eligibility to allow COVID-19 as a reason to request an absentee ballot, and 18 states mailed absentee ballot applications or absentee ballots to all registered voters.

CONCLUSION

While 39 states operate emergency absentee voting processes for hospitalized voters, there are considerable areas for improvement and heterogeneity in guidelines for these protocols. For future election cycles, information on emergency voting and broader election reforms due to COVID-19 may be useful for emergency providers and patients alike to improve the democratic participation of voters experiencing illness.

摘要

引言

在选民投票率方面,面临疾病或残疾的选民比例不成比例地偏低。早期的研究表明,赋予这些人群选举权可能会加强实施改善健康结果和公平性的政策。由于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行和 2020 年选举的同时发生,我们旨在评估紧急缺席投票程序,该程序允许在常规缺席截止日期后住院的选民仍能获得缺席选票,并评估由于 COVID-19 而在所有 50 个州进行的选举变更。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面研究,收集了 34 个与紧急投票程序和 COVID-19 相关选举变更相关的变量,包括截止日期、申请和选票提交的方法以及患者的专门服务。数据按优先顺序从州选举委员会网站、投票工作人员手册、申请表和州立法中获取。我们通过与州选举委员会的直接通信来验证所有数据。

结果

在 39 个州实施了紧急缺席投票程序,其余的州则实行普遍的邮寄选票(n = 5)或延长常规缺席投票截止日期(n = 6)。紧急缺席投票期通常在正常缺席申请截止日期后的 24 小时内开始,该截止日期通常是选举前七天(n = 11)。紧急投票程序的独特方面包括患者指定“授权代理人”来提交他们的申请和选票(n = 38)、电子选票交付(n = 5)以及直接向患者投递选票的现场团队(n = 18)。全国范围内这些程序存在的记录障碍包括无法在线获取信息(n = 11)、限制授权代理人必须是家庭成员的规定(n = 7)、医生宣誓书或签名(n = 9)以及需要公证人或证人签名的要求(n = 15)。在 2020 年 11 月总统选举中,有 12 个州扩大了缺席投票资格,允许将 COVID-19 作为申请缺席选票的理由,有 18 个州向所有登记选民邮寄缺席选票申请或缺席选票。

结论

虽然 39 个州为住院选民实施了紧急缺席投票程序,但在这些协议的指导方针方面仍有相当大的改进和异质性的空间。对于未来的选举周期,有关紧急投票和由于 COVID-19 而进行的更广泛选举改革的信息可能对急诊提供者和患者都有用,以提高患病选民的民主参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c28/8328173/8f79b7f48ecb/wjem-22-1000-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c28/8328173/552f1a13a410/wjem-22-1000-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c28/8328173/fcb884835cf1/wjem-22-1000-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c28/8328173/8f79b7f48ecb/wjem-22-1000-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c28/8328173/552f1a13a410/wjem-22-1000-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c28/8328173/fcb884835cf1/wjem-22-1000-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c28/8328173/8f79b7f48ecb/wjem-22-1000-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.紧急情况下为住院患者提供缺席投票和在 COVID-19 期间投票:一项 50 个州的研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;22(4):1000-1009. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884.
2
Emergency Patient Voting Initiative in a Community Hospital During a Global Pandemic:: Lessons and a Call-to-Action for Expanded Voter Access.全球大流行期间社区医院的急诊患者投票倡议:扩大选民投票机会的经验教训与行动呼吁
Dela J Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;7(1):76-77. doi: 10.32481/djph.2021.01.015. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Emergency Mail-in Voting in Rhode Island: Protecting Civic Participation During COVID-19 and Beyond.罗德岛州的紧急邮寄投票:在新冠疫情期间及之后保护公民参与度
R I Med J (2013). 2020 Oct 1;103(8):14-17.
4
The Impact of State Voting Processes in the 2020 Election: Estimating the Effects on Voter Turnout, Voting Method, and the Spread of COVID-19.2020年选举中各州投票程序的影响:评估对选民投票率、投票方式及新冠病毒传播的影响
Rand Health Q. 2023 Dec 20;11(1):7. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election?缺席投票如何影响2020年美国大选?
Sci Adv. 2021 Dec 24;7(52):eabk1755. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk1755. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
6
Adoption of Strategies to Mitigate Transmission of COVID-19 During a Statewide Primary Election - Delaware, September 2020.在全州初选期间采用策略来减轻 COVID-19 传播 - 特拉华州,2020 年 9 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1571-1575. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943e2.
7
America's electorate is increasingly polarized along partisan lines about voting by mail during the COVID-19 crisis.在美国 COVID-19 危机期间,通过邮件投票的问题上,美国选民越来越两极分化,党派立场鲜明。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 6;117(40):24640-24642. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008023117. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Political Priorities, Voting, and Political Action Committee Engagement of Emergency Medicine Trainees: A National Survey.急诊医学住院医师的政治优先事项、投票和政治行动委员会参与情况:一项全国性调查。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 May 5;24(3):469-478. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59351.
9
Examining Pediatric Residency Voting Practices.考察儿科住院医师投票实践。
South Med J. 2021 Jan;114(1):13-16. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001191.
10
Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail.2020 年鼓励邮寄投票的实地试验结果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021022118.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between in-person voting and COVID-19: Evidence from the Wisconsin primary.亲自投票与新冠病毒病之间的关系:来自威斯康星州初选的证据。
Contemp Econ Policy. 2021 Oct;39(4):760-777. doi: 10.1111/coep.12519. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
COVID and the US election: will the rise of mail-in voting affect the result?新冠疫情与美国大选:邮寄投票的增加会影响选举结果吗?
Nature. 2020 Oct 23. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02979-x.
3
Emergency Mail-in Voting in Rhode Island: Protecting Civic Participation During COVID-19 and Beyond.罗德岛州的紧急邮寄投票:在新冠疫情期间及之后保护公民参与度
R I Med J (2013). 2020 Oct 1;103(8):14-17.
4
Voting, health and interventions in healthcare settings: a scoping review.投票、健康与医疗环境中的干预措施:一项范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2020 Jul 1;41:16. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00133-6. eCollection 2020.
5
No Detectable Surge in SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Attributable to the April 7, 2020 Wisconsin Election.未检测到可归因于2020年4月7日威斯康星州选举的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)传播激增情况。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1169-1170. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305770. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
The Moral Determinants of Health.健康的道德决定因素。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):225-226. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11129.
7
Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share.普遍的邮寄选票对党派投票率或选票份额没有影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14052-14056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007249117. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
High COVID-19 Attack Rate Among Attendees at Events at a Church - Arkansas, March 2020.2020 年 3 月,阿肯色州一教堂活动参与者的 COVID-19 感染率较高。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 22;69(20):632-635. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6920e2.
9
Disparities in the Population at Risk of Severe Illness From COVID-19 by Race/Ethnicity and Income.按种族/族裔和收入划分的新冠重症风险人群差异
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):137-139. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
High SARS-CoV-2 Attack Rate Following Exposure at a Choir Practice - Skagit County, Washington, March 2020.2020 年 3 月,在美国华盛顿州斯卡吉特县,合唱团排练后出现高 SARS-CoV-2 感染率。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 15;69(19):606-610. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919e6.