Hemminger Karoline, König Hannes, Månsson Johan, Bellingrath-Kimura Sonoko-Dorothea, Nilsson Lovisa
Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany.
Humboldt-Universität Berlin Berlin Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 24;12(3):e8719. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8719. eCollection 2022 Mar.
While agricultural intensification and expansion are major factors driving loss and degradation of natural habitat and species decline, some wildlife species also benefit from agriculturally managed habitats. This may lead to high population densities with impacts on both human livelihoods and wildlife conservation. Cranes are a group of 15 species worldwide, affected both negatively and positively by agricultural practices. While eleven species face critical population declines, numbers of common cranes () and sandhill cranes () have increased drastically in the last 40 years. Their increase is associated with higher incidences of crane foraging on agricultural crops, causing financial losses to farmers. Our aim was to synthesize scientific knowledge on the bilateral effects of land use change and crane populations. We conducted a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed publications on agriculture-crane interactions ( = 135) and on the importance of agricultural crops in the diet of cranes ( = 81). Agricultural crops constitute a considerable part of the diet of all crane species (average of 37%, most frequently maize ( L.) and wheat ( L.)). Crop damage was identified in only 10% of all agriculture-crane interactions, although one-third of interactions included cranes foraging on cropland. Using a conceptual framework analysis, we identified two major pathways in agriculture-crane interactions: (1) habitat loss with negative effects on crane species dependent on specific habitats, and (2) expanding agricultural habitats with superabundant food availability beneficial for opportunistic crane species. The degree to which crane species can adapt to agricultural land use changes may be an important factor explaining their population response. We conclude that multi-objective management needs to combine land sparing and land sharing strategies at landscape scale. To support viable crane populations while guaranteeing sustainable agricultural production, it is necessary to include the perspectives of diverse stakeholders and streamline conservation initiatives and agricultural policy accordingly.
虽然农业集约化和扩张是导致自然栖息地丧失和退化以及物种减少的主要因素,但一些野生动物物种也受益于农业管理的栖息地。这可能导致种群密度过高,对人类生计和野生动物保护都产生影响。鹤是全球15种鸟类的统称,农业活动对它们有正负两方面的影响。虽然11种鹤面临着种群数量的急剧下降,但在过去40年里,普通鹤()和沙丘鹤()的数量却大幅增加。它们数量的增加与鹤在农作物上觅食的频率增加有关,给农民造成了经济损失。我们的目的是综合关于土地利用变化和鹤种群的双边影响的科学知识。我们对同行评审的关于农业与鹤相互作用的出版物( = 135)以及关于农作物在鹤的饮食中的重要性的出版物( = 81)进行了系统的文献综述。农作物构成了所有鹤类饮食的相当一部分(平均为37%,最常见的是玉米(L.)和小麦(L.))。在所有农业与鹤的相互作用中,只有10%被确定存在作物损害,尽管三分之一的相互作用包括鹤在农田觅食。通过概念框架分析,我们确定了农业与鹤相互作用的两条主要途径:(1)栖息地丧失,对依赖特定栖息地的鹤类物种产生负面影响;(2)农业栖息地的扩张,食物供应过剩,有利于机会主义鹤类物种。鹤类物种适应农业土地利用变化的程度可能是解释其种群反应的一个重要因素。我们得出结论,多目标管理需要在景观尺度上结合土地节约和土地共享策略。为了在保证可持续农业生产的同时支持鹤类种群的生存,有必要纳入不同利益相关者的观点,并相应地简化保护举措和农业政策。