Smith Jenna, Filmalter Celia, Masenge Andries, Heyns Tanya
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;12(2):112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
: Triage is applied in emergency centres (ECs) to assign degrees of urgency to illnesses or injuries to decide in which order to treat patients, especially when there are many patients or casualties, facilitating the allocation of scarce medical resources. A triage nurse determines triage priority by assessing patients using an established triage tool with specific criteria. The South African Triage Scale is widely used in South African ECs. Although the South African Triage Scale has been adopted and implemented in both private and public healthcare ECs in South Africa, few studies have assessed the accuracy of nurse-led triage in private ECs.
: To determine the accuracy of nurse-led triage in ECs in urban, private hospitals.
: A quantitative, descriptive, retrospective study was done. Three private hospitals with similar average patient volumes were purposively selected. We sampled the nursing notes as follows: 1) we stratified nursing notes by nurse qualification and then 2) for each category of nurse we stratified nursing notes according to triage priority level and 3) then systematically randomly selected the recommended number of notes from each triage priority level for each nurse category. We retrospectively audited 389 EC nursing notes to determine the accuracy of nurse-led triage. For each note, we independently applied the South African Triage Scale, and then determined agreement between our score and the score determined by the triage nurse.
: We recorded 342 triage errors, consisting of triage early warning scores (TEWS) errors ( = 168), discriminator errors ( = 97) and additional investigation errors ( = 77). Overall agreement between the triage nurses and our scores was 71.7% ( = 279). Triage errors ( = 110) consisted of 3.9% ( = 15) over-triage errors and 24.4% ( = 95) under-triage errors. The highest level of agreement was between our scores and the scores of the emergency trained registered nurses (85%) and enrolled nursing assistants (78%).
In South African ECs, the South African Triage Scale is not always correctly applied, which can lead to almost a quarter (24.4%) of cases being under-triaged and not receiving timeous care. Our results suggest that emergency trained registered nurses are well equipped to be triage nurses, and that this skill should be developed in South African nursing curricula.
分诊应用于急救中心,为疾病或损伤确定紧急程度,以决定治疗患者的先后顺序,特别是在患者或伤亡人员众多时,有助于稀缺医疗资源的分配。分诊护士通过使用具有特定标准的既定分诊工具评估患者来确定分诊优先级。南非分诊量表在南非急救中心广泛使用。尽管南非分诊量表已在南非的私立和公立医疗保健急救中心采用和实施,但很少有研究评估私立急救中心护士主导分诊的准确性。
确定城市私立医院急救中心护士主导分诊的准确性。
进行了一项定量、描述性回顾性研究。有目的地选择了三家平均患者数量相似的私立医院。我们对护理记录进行如下抽样:1)我们按护士资质对护理记录进行分层,然后2)对于每类护士,我们根据分诊优先级对护理记录进行分层,3)然后系统地从每个分诊优先级为每个护士类别随机选择推荐数量的记录。我们回顾性审核了389份急救中心护理记录,以确定护士主导分诊的准确性。对于每份记录,我们独立应用南非分诊量表,然后确定我们的评分与分诊护士确定的评分之间的一致性。
我们记录了342例分诊错误,包括分诊早期预警评分(TEWS)错误(=168)、鉴别器错误(=97)和额外调查错误(=77)。分诊护士与我们的评分之间的总体一致性为71.7%(=279)。分诊错误(=110)包括3.9%(=15)的过度分诊错误和24.4%(=95)的分诊不足错误。我们的评分与急救培训注册护士(85%)和注册护理助理(78%)的评分之间的一致性最高。
在南非急救中心,南非分诊量表并非总是得到正确应用,这可能导致近四分之一(24.4%)的病例分诊不足,无法及时获得护理。我们的结果表明,接受过急救培训的注册护士具备担任分诊护士的良好条件,这种技能应在南非护理课程中得到培养。